Decreasing incidence of upper age restriction enrollment criteria among cancer clinical trials

Ethan B. Ludmir, Ishwaria M. Subbiah, Walker Mainwaring, Austin B. Miller, Timothy A. Lin, Amit Jethanandani, Andres F. Espinoza, Jacob J. Mandel, Penny Fang, Benjamin D. Smith, Grace L. Smith, Chelsea C. Pinnix, Mina S. Sedrak, Gretchen G. Kimmick, Thomas E. Stinchcombe, Reshma Jagsi, Charles R. Thomas, C. David Fuller, Noam A. VanderWalde

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Age disparities among cancer clinical trial participants are pervasive and worsening over time. Identification of factors associated with age disparities is critical to improve enrollment of older patients on trials. The incidence and impact of trial eligibility criteria that exclude patients on the basis of age remains opaque. Methods: ClinicalTrials.gov was queried for completed oncologic randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Phase 3 RCTs assessing a therapeutic intervention among adult cancer patients were included. Trial eligibility criteria were assessed using the ClinicalTrials.gov website as well as trial publications and protocol documentation. Results: Seven hundred and forty-two trials met inclusion criteria, with a total combined enrollment of 449,720 patients. Upper age restriction enrollment criteria were identified for 10.1% of RCTs; the median age cutoff for restricted trials was 72 years (interquartile range 70–80 years). Linear regression modeling revealed decreasing incidence of age restriction criteria over time, at a rate of −1.1% annually (p = .03); trials initiating enrollment in 2002–2005, for example, had a 16.1% rate of age-restrictive eligibility criteria, compared with 7.6% for trials initiating enrollment in 2010–2014. Conclusion: Use of eligibility criteria that explicitly exclude patients on the basis of age appears to be decreasing with time. Future efforts should aim to better characterize the relationship between eligibility criteria (such as those that exclude patients on the basis of specific organ function) and their association with age disparities among enrolled patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)451-454
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Geriatric Oncology
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2020

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • Clinical trials
  • Eligibility
  • Exclusion
  • Geriatric oncology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Decreasing incidence of upper age restriction enrollment criteria among cancer clinical trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this