Decreased splatter in dermabrasion.

A. J. Cox, Ted Cook, Tom Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare a new dermabrasion instrument equipped with a metal shield and hydration-suction apparatus with the standard instrument, with specific attention to the exposure of operating room personnel to potentially hazardous particles. DESIGN: A surgical trial with each of the instruments was performed with a skin model. The splatter caused by the 2 instruments was evaluated and compared statistically and graphically. SUBJECTS: Female hairless guinea pigs (450 g) were used as a skin model. INTERVENTIONS: Ten guinea pigs were treated with the standard dermabrading instrument, and 10 were treated with a shielded suction-irrigating dermabrader. The splatter was analyzed by counting the number of particles landing on strategically placed glass slides. Evaluations of histologic cross-sections of the dermabraded skin were compared in a blinded fashion. RESULTS: Statistical and graphic analysis showed the number of potentially hazardous particles generated by the suction dermabrader to be significantly less than that generated by the standard dermabrader. Histologic sections showed no difference between the 2 subsets. CONCLUSION: The new shielded suction-irrigating dermabrader provides comparable surgical results while significantly decreasing exposure to potentially hazardous splatter particles. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2000;2:23-26

Fingerprint

Dermabrasion
Suction
Skin
Guinea Pigs
Operating Rooms
Glass
Metals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

@article{645b26241c4045c9970d8beee63abd2c,
title = "Decreased splatter in dermabrasion.",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To compare a new dermabrasion instrument equipped with a metal shield and hydration-suction apparatus with the standard instrument, with specific attention to the exposure of operating room personnel to potentially hazardous particles. DESIGN: A surgical trial with each of the instruments was performed with a skin model. The splatter caused by the 2 instruments was evaluated and compared statistically and graphically. SUBJECTS: Female hairless guinea pigs (450 g) were used as a skin model. INTERVENTIONS: Ten guinea pigs were treated with the standard dermabrading instrument, and 10 were treated with a shielded suction-irrigating dermabrader. The splatter was analyzed by counting the number of particles landing on strategically placed glass slides. Evaluations of histologic cross-sections of the dermabraded skin were compared in a blinded fashion. RESULTS: Statistical and graphic analysis showed the number of potentially hazardous particles generated by the suction dermabrader to be significantly less than that generated by the standard dermabrader. Histologic sections showed no difference between the 2 subsets. CONCLUSION: The new shielded suction-irrigating dermabrader provides comparable surgical results while significantly decreasing exposure to potentially hazardous splatter particles. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2000;2:23-26",
author = "Cox, {A. J.} and Ted Cook and Tom Wang",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "23--26",
journal = "JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery",
issn = "2168-6076",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Decreased splatter in dermabrasion.

AU - Cox, A. J.

AU - Cook, Ted

AU - Wang, Tom

PY - 2000/1

Y1 - 2000/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To compare a new dermabrasion instrument equipped with a metal shield and hydration-suction apparatus with the standard instrument, with specific attention to the exposure of operating room personnel to potentially hazardous particles. DESIGN: A surgical trial with each of the instruments was performed with a skin model. The splatter caused by the 2 instruments was evaluated and compared statistically and graphically. SUBJECTS: Female hairless guinea pigs (450 g) were used as a skin model. INTERVENTIONS: Ten guinea pigs were treated with the standard dermabrading instrument, and 10 were treated with a shielded suction-irrigating dermabrader. The splatter was analyzed by counting the number of particles landing on strategically placed glass slides. Evaluations of histologic cross-sections of the dermabraded skin were compared in a blinded fashion. RESULTS: Statistical and graphic analysis showed the number of potentially hazardous particles generated by the suction dermabrader to be significantly less than that generated by the standard dermabrader. Histologic sections showed no difference between the 2 subsets. CONCLUSION: The new shielded suction-irrigating dermabrader provides comparable surgical results while significantly decreasing exposure to potentially hazardous splatter particles. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2000;2:23-26

AB - OBJECTIVE: To compare a new dermabrasion instrument equipped with a metal shield and hydration-suction apparatus with the standard instrument, with specific attention to the exposure of operating room personnel to potentially hazardous particles. DESIGN: A surgical trial with each of the instruments was performed with a skin model. The splatter caused by the 2 instruments was evaluated and compared statistically and graphically. SUBJECTS: Female hairless guinea pigs (450 g) were used as a skin model. INTERVENTIONS: Ten guinea pigs were treated with the standard dermabrading instrument, and 10 were treated with a shielded suction-irrigating dermabrader. The splatter was analyzed by counting the number of particles landing on strategically placed glass slides. Evaluations of histologic cross-sections of the dermabraded skin were compared in a blinded fashion. RESULTS: Statistical and graphic analysis showed the number of potentially hazardous particles generated by the suction dermabrader to be significantly less than that generated by the standard dermabrader. Histologic sections showed no difference between the 2 subsets. CONCLUSION: The new shielded suction-irrigating dermabrader provides comparable surgical results while significantly decreasing exposure to potentially hazardous splatter particles. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2000;2:23-26

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033655701&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033655701&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10925420

AN - SCOPUS:0033655701

VL - 2

SP - 23

EP - 26

JO - JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery

JF - JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery

SN - 2168-6076

IS - 1

ER -