Deceased Organ Donor Management: Does Hospital Volume Matter?

Madhukar S. Patel, Jahan Mohebali, Mitchell Sally, Tahnee Groat, Parsia A. Vagefi, David C. Chang, Darren Malinoski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Identification of strategies to improve organ donor use remains imperative. Despite the association between hospital volume and outcomes for many common disease processes, there have been no studies that assess the impact of organ donor hospital volume on organ yield. Study Design A prospective observational study of all deceased organ donors managed by 10 organ procurement organizations across United Network for Organ Sharing regions 4, 5, and 6 was conducted from February 2012 to June 2015. To study the impact of hospital volume on organ yield, each donor was placed into a hospital-volume quartile based on the number of donors managed by their hospital. Stepwise logistic regression was used to identify the independent effect of hospital volume on the primary outcomes measure of having ≥4 organs transplanted per donor. Results Data from 4,427 donors across 384 hospitals were collected and hospitals were assigned quartiles based on their volume of deceased donors. Hospitals managed a mean ± SD of 3.3 ± 5.2 donors per hospital per year. After adjusting for age, ethnicity, donor type, blood type, BMI, creatinine, and organ procurement organization/donor service area, being managed in hospitals within the highest volume quartile remained a positive independent predictor of ≥4 organs transplanted per donor (odds ratio = 1.52; 95% CI 1.29 to 1.79; p < 0.001). Conclusions Deceased organ donor hospital volume impacts organ yield, with the highest-volume centers being 52% more likely to achieve ≥4 organs transplanted per donor. Efforts should be made to share practices from these higher-volume centers and consideration should be given to centralization of donor care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)294-300
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume224
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017

Fingerprint

Tissue Donors
Organ Size
Tissue and Organ Procurement
High-Volume Hospitals
Blood Donors
Observational Studies
Creatinine
Logistic Models
Odds Ratio
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Prospective Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Deceased Organ Donor Management : Does Hospital Volume Matter? / Patel, Madhukar S.; Mohebali, Jahan; Sally, Mitchell; Groat, Tahnee; Vagefi, Parsia A.; Chang, David C.; Malinoski, Darren.

In: Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Vol. 224, No. 3, 01.03.2017, p. 294-300.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Patel, Madhukar S. ; Mohebali, Jahan ; Sally, Mitchell ; Groat, Tahnee ; Vagefi, Parsia A. ; Chang, David C. ; Malinoski, Darren. / Deceased Organ Donor Management : Does Hospital Volume Matter?. In: Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2017 ; Vol. 224, No. 3. pp. 294-300.
@article{ad1124a9b85b48a1a5f10a4e8544b6ed,
title = "Deceased Organ Donor Management: Does Hospital Volume Matter?",
abstract = "Background Identification of strategies to improve organ donor use remains imperative. Despite the association between hospital volume and outcomes for many common disease processes, there have been no studies that assess the impact of organ donor hospital volume on organ yield. Study Design A prospective observational study of all deceased organ donors managed by 10 organ procurement organizations across United Network for Organ Sharing regions 4, 5, and 6 was conducted from February 2012 to June 2015. To study the impact of hospital volume on organ yield, each donor was placed into a hospital-volume quartile based on the number of donors managed by their hospital. Stepwise logistic regression was used to identify the independent effect of hospital volume on the primary outcomes measure of having ≥4 organs transplanted per donor. Results Data from 4,427 donors across 384 hospitals were collected and hospitals were assigned quartiles based on their volume of deceased donors. Hospitals managed a mean ± SD of 3.3 ± 5.2 donors per hospital per year. After adjusting for age, ethnicity, donor type, blood type, BMI, creatinine, and organ procurement organization/donor service area, being managed in hospitals within the highest volume quartile remained a positive independent predictor of ≥4 organs transplanted per donor (odds ratio = 1.52; 95{\%} CI 1.29 to 1.79; p < 0.001). Conclusions Deceased organ donor hospital volume impacts organ yield, with the highest-volume centers being 52{\%} more likely to achieve ≥4 organs transplanted per donor. Efforts should be made to share practices from these higher-volume centers and consideration should be given to centralization of donor care.",
author = "Patel, {Madhukar S.} and Jahan Mohebali and Mitchell Sally and Tahnee Groat and Vagefi, {Parsia A.} and Chang, {David C.} and Darren Malinoski",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "224",
pages = "294--300",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Surgeons",
issn = "1072-7515",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deceased Organ Donor Management

T2 - Does Hospital Volume Matter?

AU - Patel, Madhukar S.

AU - Mohebali, Jahan

AU - Sally, Mitchell

AU - Groat, Tahnee

AU - Vagefi, Parsia A.

AU - Chang, David C.

AU - Malinoski, Darren

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Background Identification of strategies to improve organ donor use remains imperative. Despite the association between hospital volume and outcomes for many common disease processes, there have been no studies that assess the impact of organ donor hospital volume on organ yield. Study Design A prospective observational study of all deceased organ donors managed by 10 organ procurement organizations across United Network for Organ Sharing regions 4, 5, and 6 was conducted from February 2012 to June 2015. To study the impact of hospital volume on organ yield, each donor was placed into a hospital-volume quartile based on the number of donors managed by their hospital. Stepwise logistic regression was used to identify the independent effect of hospital volume on the primary outcomes measure of having ≥4 organs transplanted per donor. Results Data from 4,427 donors across 384 hospitals were collected and hospitals were assigned quartiles based on their volume of deceased donors. Hospitals managed a mean ± SD of 3.3 ± 5.2 donors per hospital per year. After adjusting for age, ethnicity, donor type, blood type, BMI, creatinine, and organ procurement organization/donor service area, being managed in hospitals within the highest volume quartile remained a positive independent predictor of ≥4 organs transplanted per donor (odds ratio = 1.52; 95% CI 1.29 to 1.79; p < 0.001). Conclusions Deceased organ donor hospital volume impacts organ yield, with the highest-volume centers being 52% more likely to achieve ≥4 organs transplanted per donor. Efforts should be made to share practices from these higher-volume centers and consideration should be given to centralization of donor care.

AB - Background Identification of strategies to improve organ donor use remains imperative. Despite the association between hospital volume and outcomes for many common disease processes, there have been no studies that assess the impact of organ donor hospital volume on organ yield. Study Design A prospective observational study of all deceased organ donors managed by 10 organ procurement organizations across United Network for Organ Sharing regions 4, 5, and 6 was conducted from February 2012 to June 2015. To study the impact of hospital volume on organ yield, each donor was placed into a hospital-volume quartile based on the number of donors managed by their hospital. Stepwise logistic regression was used to identify the independent effect of hospital volume on the primary outcomes measure of having ≥4 organs transplanted per donor. Results Data from 4,427 donors across 384 hospitals were collected and hospitals were assigned quartiles based on their volume of deceased donors. Hospitals managed a mean ± SD of 3.3 ± 5.2 donors per hospital per year. After adjusting for age, ethnicity, donor type, blood type, BMI, creatinine, and organ procurement organization/donor service area, being managed in hospitals within the highest volume quartile remained a positive independent predictor of ≥4 organs transplanted per donor (odds ratio = 1.52; 95% CI 1.29 to 1.79; p < 0.001). Conclusions Deceased organ donor hospital volume impacts organ yield, with the highest-volume centers being 52% more likely to achieve ≥4 organs transplanted per donor. Efforts should be made to share practices from these higher-volume centers and consideration should be given to centralization of donor care.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010977240&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85010977240&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 28108262

AN - SCOPUS:85010977240

VL - 224

SP - 294

EP - 300

JO - Journal of the American College of Surgeons

JF - Journal of the American College of Surgeons

SN - 1072-7515

IS - 3

ER -