Debate: Is there low hanging fruit in healthcare human factors?

F. Jacob Seagull, Yan Xiao, David Eibling, Paul Gorman

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Does Human Factors and Ergonomics have anything to contribute to patient safety and healthcare practices? Most people would say yes. However, there is great controversy as to the form the contribution can take. Can this contribution be made in the form of standards, recommended practices, and principles of human factors? Or must our contribution consist of the dedication of human factors professionals within the domain of healthcare? Some assert that healthcare is so complex that simple guidelines and best practices will not solve any significant problems; all worthwhile problems require the in-depth, sophisticated techniques performed by human factors professionals. This session will present a debate that examines these issues. The results of the debate may help focus healthcare human factors toward the most productive approaches for influencing healthcare and patient safety.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publication54th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2010, HFES 2010
PublisherHuman Factors and Ergonomics Society Inc.
Pages1905
Number of pages1
ISBN (Print)9781617820885
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Publication series

NameProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Volume3
ISSN (Print)1071-1813

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Debate: Is there low hanging fruit in healthcare human factors?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this