Data quality of the German Screening Colonoscopy Registry

Andreas Adler, David Lieberman, Alireza Aminalai, Jens Aschenbeck, Rolf Drossel, Michael Mayr, Michael Mroß, Mathias Scheel, Andreas Schröder, Christoph Keining, Gabriela Stange, Bertram Wiedenmann, Ulrich Gauger, Lutz Altenhofen, Thomas Rösch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and study aims: The German screening colonoscopy program is accompanied by a central registry that records the main outcome quality indicators, namely colonoscopy completion rate, adenoma detection rate (ADR), and complication rate. The aim of the present study was to assess the quality of these registry data by comparing them with data from a prospective quality assurance study based on a self-reporting audit and patient feedback of screening colonoscopy. Patients and methods: The completeness of registry information was analyzed by comparing it with prospective data gathered by audit and patient feedback in a previous quality assurance study (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00860665) between October 2006 and March 2008. The main outcome parameters were colonoscopy completion rate, ADR, and complication rate. Complications were recorded in three steps in the audit study using case report forms (immediate and subsequent documentation by physicians [CRF-1 and CRF-2], and patient follow-up [CRF-3]), but were documented in the registry without differentiation. Results: A total of 12 134 individuals (mean age 64.5 years; 47 % men) who underwent screening colonoscopy at 19 private practices in Berlin over the 18-month period were included in the audit study. Patient feedback was obtained for 90.1 %. A total of 12 150 cases had been recorded in the registry by the same private practices during the same period. Colonoscopy completion rate and ADR data were comparable in the audit study and registry (completion rate 98.2 % vs. 97.7 %; ADR 21.0 % vs. 20.5 %). However, compared with the registry data, the complication rate was 3.1-fold higher in the audit (0.46 % vs. 0.15 %; P <0.001), and double (0.33 % vs. 0.15 %; P <0.05) when patient feedback was not included. Conclusions: Of the screening colonoscopy quality parameters, colonoscopy completion rate and ADR, but not complication rates, were reliably documented in the German national screening colonoscopy registry. Data on complications need to be appropriately standardized and audited in order to be used for credentialing and benchmarking purposes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)813-818
Number of pages6
JournalEndoscopy
Volume45
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Colonoscopy
Registries
Adenoma
Private Practice
Credentialing
Data Accuracy
Benchmarking
Berlin
Documentation
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Adler, A., Lieberman, D., Aminalai, A., Aschenbeck, J., Drossel, R., Mayr, M., ... Rösch, T. (2013). Data quality of the German Screening Colonoscopy Registry. Endoscopy, 45(10), 813-818. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1344583

Data quality of the German Screening Colonoscopy Registry. / Adler, Andreas; Lieberman, David; Aminalai, Alireza; Aschenbeck, Jens; Drossel, Rolf; Mayr, Michael; Mroß, Michael; Scheel, Mathias; Schröder, Andreas; Keining, Christoph; Stange, Gabriela; Wiedenmann, Bertram; Gauger, Ulrich; Altenhofen, Lutz; Rösch, Thomas.

In: Endoscopy, Vol. 45, No. 10, 2013, p. 813-818.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Adler, A, Lieberman, D, Aminalai, A, Aschenbeck, J, Drossel, R, Mayr, M, Mroß, M, Scheel, M, Schröder, A, Keining, C, Stange, G, Wiedenmann, B, Gauger, U, Altenhofen, L & Rösch, T 2013, 'Data quality of the German Screening Colonoscopy Registry', Endoscopy, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 813-818. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1344583
Adler A, Lieberman D, Aminalai A, Aschenbeck J, Drossel R, Mayr M et al. Data quality of the German Screening Colonoscopy Registry. Endoscopy. 2013;45(10):813-818. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1344583
Adler, Andreas ; Lieberman, David ; Aminalai, Alireza ; Aschenbeck, Jens ; Drossel, Rolf ; Mayr, Michael ; Mroß, Michael ; Scheel, Mathias ; Schröder, Andreas ; Keining, Christoph ; Stange, Gabriela ; Wiedenmann, Bertram ; Gauger, Ulrich ; Altenhofen, Lutz ; Rösch, Thomas. / Data quality of the German Screening Colonoscopy Registry. In: Endoscopy. 2013 ; Vol. 45, No. 10. pp. 813-818.
@article{6a73472c373c48e4b74d3d9e107ed7b8,
title = "Data quality of the German Screening Colonoscopy Registry",
abstract = "Background and study aims: The German screening colonoscopy program is accompanied by a central registry that records the main outcome quality indicators, namely colonoscopy completion rate, adenoma detection rate (ADR), and complication rate. The aim of the present study was to assess the quality of these registry data by comparing them with data from a prospective quality assurance study based on a self-reporting audit and patient feedback of screening colonoscopy. Patients and methods: The completeness of registry information was analyzed by comparing it with prospective data gathered by audit and patient feedback in a previous quality assurance study (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00860665) between October 2006 and March 2008. The main outcome parameters were colonoscopy completion rate, ADR, and complication rate. Complications were recorded in three steps in the audit study using case report forms (immediate and subsequent documentation by physicians [CRF-1 and CRF-2], and patient follow-up [CRF-3]), but were documented in the registry without differentiation. Results: A total of 12 134 individuals (mean age 64.5 years; 47 {\%} men) who underwent screening colonoscopy at 19 private practices in Berlin over the 18-month period were included in the audit study. Patient feedback was obtained for 90.1 {\%}. A total of 12 150 cases had been recorded in the registry by the same private practices during the same period. Colonoscopy completion rate and ADR data were comparable in the audit study and registry (completion rate 98.2 {\%} vs. 97.7 {\%}; ADR 21.0 {\%} vs. 20.5 {\%}). However, compared with the registry data, the complication rate was 3.1-fold higher in the audit (0.46 {\%} vs. 0.15 {\%}; P <0.001), and double (0.33 {\%} vs. 0.15 {\%}; P <0.05) when patient feedback was not included. Conclusions: Of the screening colonoscopy quality parameters, colonoscopy completion rate and ADR, but not complication rates, were reliably documented in the German national screening colonoscopy registry. Data on complications need to be appropriately standardized and audited in order to be used for credentialing and benchmarking purposes.",
author = "Andreas Adler and David Lieberman and Alireza Aminalai and Jens Aschenbeck and Rolf Drossel and Michael Mayr and Michael Mro{\ss} and Mathias Scheel and Andreas Schr{\"o}der and Christoph Keining and Gabriela Stange and Bertram Wiedenmann and Ulrich Gauger and Lutz Altenhofen and Thomas R{\"o}sch",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1055/s-0033-1344583",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "813--818",
journal = "Endoscopy",
issn = "0013-726X",
publisher = "Georg Thieme Verlag",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Data quality of the German Screening Colonoscopy Registry

AU - Adler, Andreas

AU - Lieberman, David

AU - Aminalai, Alireza

AU - Aschenbeck, Jens

AU - Drossel, Rolf

AU - Mayr, Michael

AU - Mroß, Michael

AU - Scheel, Mathias

AU - Schröder, Andreas

AU - Keining, Christoph

AU - Stange, Gabriela

AU - Wiedenmann, Bertram

AU - Gauger, Ulrich

AU - Altenhofen, Lutz

AU - Rösch, Thomas

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Background and study aims: The German screening colonoscopy program is accompanied by a central registry that records the main outcome quality indicators, namely colonoscopy completion rate, adenoma detection rate (ADR), and complication rate. The aim of the present study was to assess the quality of these registry data by comparing them with data from a prospective quality assurance study based on a self-reporting audit and patient feedback of screening colonoscopy. Patients and methods: The completeness of registry information was analyzed by comparing it with prospective data gathered by audit and patient feedback in a previous quality assurance study (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00860665) between October 2006 and March 2008. The main outcome parameters were colonoscopy completion rate, ADR, and complication rate. Complications were recorded in three steps in the audit study using case report forms (immediate and subsequent documentation by physicians [CRF-1 and CRF-2], and patient follow-up [CRF-3]), but were documented in the registry without differentiation. Results: A total of 12 134 individuals (mean age 64.5 years; 47 % men) who underwent screening colonoscopy at 19 private practices in Berlin over the 18-month period were included in the audit study. Patient feedback was obtained for 90.1 %. A total of 12 150 cases had been recorded in the registry by the same private practices during the same period. Colonoscopy completion rate and ADR data were comparable in the audit study and registry (completion rate 98.2 % vs. 97.7 %; ADR 21.0 % vs. 20.5 %). However, compared with the registry data, the complication rate was 3.1-fold higher in the audit (0.46 % vs. 0.15 %; P <0.001), and double (0.33 % vs. 0.15 %; P <0.05) when patient feedback was not included. Conclusions: Of the screening colonoscopy quality parameters, colonoscopy completion rate and ADR, but not complication rates, were reliably documented in the German national screening colonoscopy registry. Data on complications need to be appropriately standardized and audited in order to be used for credentialing and benchmarking purposes.

AB - Background and study aims: The German screening colonoscopy program is accompanied by a central registry that records the main outcome quality indicators, namely colonoscopy completion rate, adenoma detection rate (ADR), and complication rate. The aim of the present study was to assess the quality of these registry data by comparing them with data from a prospective quality assurance study based on a self-reporting audit and patient feedback of screening colonoscopy. Patients and methods: The completeness of registry information was analyzed by comparing it with prospective data gathered by audit and patient feedback in a previous quality assurance study (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00860665) between October 2006 and March 2008. The main outcome parameters were colonoscopy completion rate, ADR, and complication rate. Complications were recorded in three steps in the audit study using case report forms (immediate and subsequent documentation by physicians [CRF-1 and CRF-2], and patient follow-up [CRF-3]), but were documented in the registry without differentiation. Results: A total of 12 134 individuals (mean age 64.5 years; 47 % men) who underwent screening colonoscopy at 19 private practices in Berlin over the 18-month period were included in the audit study. Patient feedback was obtained for 90.1 %. A total of 12 150 cases had been recorded in the registry by the same private practices during the same period. Colonoscopy completion rate and ADR data were comparable in the audit study and registry (completion rate 98.2 % vs. 97.7 %; ADR 21.0 % vs. 20.5 %). However, compared with the registry data, the complication rate was 3.1-fold higher in the audit (0.46 % vs. 0.15 %; P <0.001), and double (0.33 % vs. 0.15 %; P <0.05) when patient feedback was not included. Conclusions: Of the screening colonoscopy quality parameters, colonoscopy completion rate and ADR, but not complication rates, were reliably documented in the German national screening colonoscopy registry. Data on complications need to be appropriately standardized and audited in order to be used for credentialing and benchmarking purposes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884902052&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884902052&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-0033-1344583

DO - 10.1055/s-0033-1344583

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 813

EP - 818

JO - Endoscopy

JF - Endoscopy

SN - 0013-726X

IS - 10

ER -