TY - JOUR
T1 - Daily and Nondaily Oral Preexposure Prophylaxis in Men and Transgender Women Who Have Sex with Men
T2 - The Human Immunodeficiency Virus Prevention Trials Network 067/ADAPT Study
AU - Grant, Robert M.
AU - Mannheimer, Sharon
AU - Hughes, James P.
AU - Hirsch-Moverman, Yael
AU - Loquere, Avelino
AU - Chitwarakorn, Anupong
AU - Curlin, Marcel E.
AU - Li, Maoji
AU - Amico, K. Rivet
AU - Hendrix, Craig W.
AU - Anderson, Peter L.
AU - Dye, Bonnie J.
AU - Marzinke, Mark A.
AU - Piwowar-Manning, Estelle
AU - McKinstry, Laura
AU - Elharrar, Vanessa
AU - Stirratt, Michael
AU - Rooney, James F.
AU - Eshleman, Susan H.
AU - McNicholl, Janet M.
AU - Van Griensven, Frits
AU - Holtz, Timothy H.
N1 - Funding Information:
Financial support. This work was supported by award numbers UM1 AI068619, UM1 AI068613, and RO1 AI118575 from the NIH (NIAID , National Institute of Mental Health, and National Institute on Drug Abuse). Gilead Sciences donated study medication to the NIH to support this study.
Funding Information:
Potential conflicts of interest. R. M. G. has been a site investigator for clinical trials funded by ViiV/GSK and Gilead Sciences to the Gladstone Institutes and the San Francisco AIDS Foundation. R. A. has received an unrestricted educational grant to the University of Michigan from Gilead Sciences (2015). P. L. A. receives study drug and contract work from Gilead Sciences. C. W. H. conducts research sponsored by ViiV, GSK, and The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and is a consultant at TRI and the University of California, Los Angeles. J. F. R. is employed by Gilead Sciences. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.
Publisher Copyright:
© Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2018.
PY - 2018/5/17
Y1 - 2018/5/17
N2 - Background Nondaily dosing of oral preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) may provide equivalent coverage of sex events compared with daily dosing. Methods At-risk men and transgender women who have sex with men were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 dosing regimens: 1 tablet daily, 1 tablet twice weekly with a postsex dose (time-driven), or 1 tablet before and after sex (event-driven), and were followed for coverage of sex events with pre- and postsex dosing measured by weekly self-report, drug concentrations, and electronic drug monitoring. Results From July 2012 to May 2014, 357 participants were randomized. In Bangkok, the coverage of sex events was 85% for the daily arm compared with 84% for the time-driven arm (P =.79) and 74% for the event-driven arm (P =.02). In Harlem, coverage was 66%, 47% (P =.01), and 52% (P =.01) for these groups. In Bangkok, PrEP medication concentrations in blood were consistent with use of ≥2 tablets per week in >95% of visits when sex was reported in the prior week, while in Harlem, such medication concentrations occurred in 48.5% in the daily arm, 30.9% in the time-driven arm, and 16.7% in the event-driven arm (P <.0001). Creatinine elevations were more common in the daily arm (P =.050), although they were not dose limiting. Conclusions Daily dosing recommendations increased coverage and protective drug concentrations in the Harlem cohort, while daily and nondaily regimens led to comparably favorable outcomes in Bangkok, where participants had higher levels of education and employment. Clinical Trials Registration NCT01327651.
AB - Background Nondaily dosing of oral preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) may provide equivalent coverage of sex events compared with daily dosing. Methods At-risk men and transgender women who have sex with men were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 dosing regimens: 1 tablet daily, 1 tablet twice weekly with a postsex dose (time-driven), or 1 tablet before and after sex (event-driven), and were followed for coverage of sex events with pre- and postsex dosing measured by weekly self-report, drug concentrations, and electronic drug monitoring. Results From July 2012 to May 2014, 357 participants were randomized. In Bangkok, the coverage of sex events was 85% for the daily arm compared with 84% for the time-driven arm (P =.79) and 74% for the event-driven arm (P =.02). In Harlem, coverage was 66%, 47% (P =.01), and 52% (P =.01) for these groups. In Bangkok, PrEP medication concentrations in blood were consistent with use of ≥2 tablets per week in >95% of visits when sex was reported in the prior week, while in Harlem, such medication concentrations occurred in 48.5% in the daily arm, 30.9% in the time-driven arm, and 16.7% in the event-driven arm (P <.0001). Creatinine elevations were more common in the daily arm (P =.050), although they were not dose limiting. Conclusions Daily dosing recommendations increased coverage and protective drug concentrations in the Harlem cohort, while daily and nondaily regimens led to comparably favorable outcomes in Bangkok, where participants had higher levels of education and employment. Clinical Trials Registration NCT01327651.
KW - HIV
KW - men who have sex with men
KW - preexposure prophylaxis
KW - prevention
KW - transgender women
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047549681&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047549681&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/cid/cix1086
DO - 10.1093/cid/cix1086
M3 - Article
C2 - 29420695
AN - SCOPUS:85047549681
SN - 1058-4838
VL - 66
SP - 1712
EP - 1721
JO - Clinical Infectious Diseases
JF - Clinical Infectious Diseases
IS - 11
ER -