Cytokines and mechanisms of lymphocyte activation

V. Paetkau, Gordon Mills

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Specific upstream segments of several cytokine genes are required for induction in T lymphocytes and work only in T lymphocytes. Control is exerted at the transcriptional level, but the relative instability of certain cytokine mRNAs (a property imparted by specific AU-rich segments in their 3' untranslated regions) also makes them susceptible to regulation at the post-transcriptional level. One consequence is that upon removal of the inductive signal, the level of mRNA falls rapidly and synthesis of the protein stops. CS is therefore able to exert an immunosuppressive effect by blocking the transcription of several cytokines. Although an enormous amount of detailed molecular and cellular information regarding cytokine biology has accumulated in the past decade, there is clearly much more to be learned. Even the types of answers required are in some cases not yet understood. For example, there is a paradox of timing in the cytokine response events compared with the overall cellular response. The changes in effector levels (Ca2+, PIs, cAMP, c-oncogenes) are transient, rising and falling in minutes. However, the cellular responses continue for many hours or days. IL-2 mRNA synthesis rapidly comes to a halt when the inducing ligand is removed from the exterior of the T cell, indicating that a signal for transcription was being continuously delivered. We presently have no candidate for this role, since the levels of known membrane-related signaling molecules rise only transiently at the time the inducing ligand is added. Another important conceptual development, one which will undoubtedly have profound importance for any pharmacologic applications of cytokines, is the question of parallel versus serial signaling when cytokines synergize with each other or with other stimulatory molecules such as antigen. If two cytokines induce the same proximal molecular response, one will usually suffice, given at a high enough level, to drive the response of the cell. But if the signals imparted are different, it is possible to drive the effect synergistically with lower concentrations of each cytokine, thereby reducing side effects. This kind of approach may be necessary in second generation applications to cancer immunotherapy with IL-2, for example, which have been plagued by toxic side-effects at the high doses required. Synergy may also need to be considered in understanding the basis of inflammatory responses driven by cytokines. As described here, the effects of IL-2 plus and IL-4 in the same reactive cellular complex can have a profound effect on the magnitude of response.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21-43
Number of pages23
JournalImmunology and Allergy Clinics of North America
Volume9
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Lymphocyte Activation
Cytokines
Interleukin-2
T-Lymphocytes
Messenger RNA
Ligands
Poisons
3' Untranslated Regions
Immunosuppressive Agents
Oncogenes
Interleukin-4
Immunotherapy
Antigens
Membranes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy

Cite this

Cytokines and mechanisms of lymphocyte activation. / Paetkau, V.; Mills, Gordon.

In: Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America, Vol. 9, No. 1, 01.01.1989, p. 21-43.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{661ae94503fd41b7a9c70f15db6e4976,
title = "Cytokines and mechanisms of lymphocyte activation",
abstract = "Specific upstream segments of several cytokine genes are required for induction in T lymphocytes and work only in T lymphocytes. Control is exerted at the transcriptional level, but the relative instability of certain cytokine mRNAs (a property imparted by specific AU-rich segments in their 3' untranslated regions) also makes them susceptible to regulation at the post-transcriptional level. One consequence is that upon removal of the inductive signal, the level of mRNA falls rapidly and synthesis of the protein stops. CS is therefore able to exert an immunosuppressive effect by blocking the transcription of several cytokines. Although an enormous amount of detailed molecular and cellular information regarding cytokine biology has accumulated in the past decade, there is clearly much more to be learned. Even the types of answers required are in some cases not yet understood. For example, there is a paradox of timing in the cytokine response events compared with the overall cellular response. The changes in effector levels (Ca2+, PIs, cAMP, c-oncogenes) are transient, rising and falling in minutes. However, the cellular responses continue for many hours or days. IL-2 mRNA synthesis rapidly comes to a halt when the inducing ligand is removed from the exterior of the T cell, indicating that a signal for transcription was being continuously delivered. We presently have no candidate for this role, since the levels of known membrane-related signaling molecules rise only transiently at the time the inducing ligand is added. Another important conceptual development, one which will undoubtedly have profound importance for any pharmacologic applications of cytokines, is the question of parallel versus serial signaling when cytokines synergize with each other or with other stimulatory molecules such as antigen. If two cytokines induce the same proximal molecular response, one will usually suffice, given at a high enough level, to drive the response of the cell. But if the signals imparted are different, it is possible to drive the effect synergistically with lower concentrations of each cytokine, thereby reducing side effects. This kind of approach may be necessary in second generation applications to cancer immunotherapy with IL-2, for example, which have been plagued by toxic side-effects at the high doses required. Synergy may also need to be considered in understanding the basis of inflammatory responses driven by cytokines. As described here, the effects of IL-2 plus and IL-4 in the same reactive cellular complex can have a profound effect on the magnitude of response.",
author = "V. Paetkau and Gordon Mills",
year = "1989",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "21--43",
journal = "Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America",
issn = "0889-8561",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cytokines and mechanisms of lymphocyte activation

AU - Paetkau, V.

AU - Mills, Gordon

PY - 1989/1/1

Y1 - 1989/1/1

N2 - Specific upstream segments of several cytokine genes are required for induction in T lymphocytes and work only in T lymphocytes. Control is exerted at the transcriptional level, but the relative instability of certain cytokine mRNAs (a property imparted by specific AU-rich segments in their 3' untranslated regions) also makes them susceptible to regulation at the post-transcriptional level. One consequence is that upon removal of the inductive signal, the level of mRNA falls rapidly and synthesis of the protein stops. CS is therefore able to exert an immunosuppressive effect by blocking the transcription of several cytokines. Although an enormous amount of detailed molecular and cellular information regarding cytokine biology has accumulated in the past decade, there is clearly much more to be learned. Even the types of answers required are in some cases not yet understood. For example, there is a paradox of timing in the cytokine response events compared with the overall cellular response. The changes in effector levels (Ca2+, PIs, cAMP, c-oncogenes) are transient, rising and falling in minutes. However, the cellular responses continue for many hours or days. IL-2 mRNA synthesis rapidly comes to a halt when the inducing ligand is removed from the exterior of the T cell, indicating that a signal for transcription was being continuously delivered. We presently have no candidate for this role, since the levels of known membrane-related signaling molecules rise only transiently at the time the inducing ligand is added. Another important conceptual development, one which will undoubtedly have profound importance for any pharmacologic applications of cytokines, is the question of parallel versus serial signaling when cytokines synergize with each other or with other stimulatory molecules such as antigen. If two cytokines induce the same proximal molecular response, one will usually suffice, given at a high enough level, to drive the response of the cell. But if the signals imparted are different, it is possible to drive the effect synergistically with lower concentrations of each cytokine, thereby reducing side effects. This kind of approach may be necessary in second generation applications to cancer immunotherapy with IL-2, for example, which have been plagued by toxic side-effects at the high doses required. Synergy may also need to be considered in understanding the basis of inflammatory responses driven by cytokines. As described here, the effects of IL-2 plus and IL-4 in the same reactive cellular complex can have a profound effect on the magnitude of response.

AB - Specific upstream segments of several cytokine genes are required for induction in T lymphocytes and work only in T lymphocytes. Control is exerted at the transcriptional level, but the relative instability of certain cytokine mRNAs (a property imparted by specific AU-rich segments in their 3' untranslated regions) also makes them susceptible to regulation at the post-transcriptional level. One consequence is that upon removal of the inductive signal, the level of mRNA falls rapidly and synthesis of the protein stops. CS is therefore able to exert an immunosuppressive effect by blocking the transcription of several cytokines. Although an enormous amount of detailed molecular and cellular information regarding cytokine biology has accumulated in the past decade, there is clearly much more to be learned. Even the types of answers required are in some cases not yet understood. For example, there is a paradox of timing in the cytokine response events compared with the overall cellular response. The changes in effector levels (Ca2+, PIs, cAMP, c-oncogenes) are transient, rising and falling in minutes. However, the cellular responses continue for many hours or days. IL-2 mRNA synthesis rapidly comes to a halt when the inducing ligand is removed from the exterior of the T cell, indicating that a signal for transcription was being continuously delivered. We presently have no candidate for this role, since the levels of known membrane-related signaling molecules rise only transiently at the time the inducing ligand is added. Another important conceptual development, one which will undoubtedly have profound importance for any pharmacologic applications of cytokines, is the question of parallel versus serial signaling when cytokines synergize with each other or with other stimulatory molecules such as antigen. If two cytokines induce the same proximal molecular response, one will usually suffice, given at a high enough level, to drive the response of the cell. But if the signals imparted are different, it is possible to drive the effect synergistically with lower concentrations of each cytokine, thereby reducing side effects. This kind of approach may be necessary in second generation applications to cancer immunotherapy with IL-2, for example, which have been plagued by toxic side-effects at the high doses required. Synergy may also need to be considered in understanding the basis of inflammatory responses driven by cytokines. As described here, the effects of IL-2 plus and IL-4 in the same reactive cellular complex can have a profound effect on the magnitude of response.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024536753&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024536753&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 21

EP - 43

JO - Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America

JF - Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America

SN - 0889-8561

IS - 1

ER -