CT differentiation of adenomyomatosis and gallbladder cancer

Brian H. Ching, Benjamin M. Yeh, Antonio C. Westphalen, Bonnie N. Joe, Aliya Qayyum, Fergus Coakley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of CT in differentiating adenomyomatosis from gallbladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We retrospectively identified the cases of 36 patients with pathologically proven adenomyomatosis (n = 22) or gallbladder cancer (n = 14) who had undergone preoperative abdominal CT. Two reviewers independently evaluated the presence and nature of morphologic gallbladder abnormalities, including the presence of intramural diverticula (i.e., small cystic-appearing spaces within the gallbladder wall). The reviewers used a five-point scale (1, definitely absent; 5, definitely present) to rate the overall likelihood of the presence of adenomyomatosis and gallbladder cancer. Ratings were dichotomized such that a diagnosis was considered present at a rating of 4 or 5 and considered absent at lower ratings. RESULTS. Reviewer 1 detected a morphologic gallbladder abnormality in 17 patients and correctly characterized the abnormality in 14 (82%) of the patients (eight with adenomyomatosis and six with gallbladder cancer). Reviewer 2 detected an abnormality in 18 patients and was correct for 13 (72%) of the patients (eight with adenomyomatosis and five with gallbladder cancer). In particular, reviewer 1 detected intramural diverticula in eight patients, and all had the pathologic diagnosis of adenomyomatosis, whereas reviewer 2 detected intramural diverticula in 11 patients, and eight (73%) had the pathologic diagnosis of adenomyomatosis. CONCLUSION. CT is limited in the detection and differentiation of adenomyomatosis and gallbladder cancer, but the diagnosis of adenomyomatosis can be made with reasonable accuracy when thickening of the gallbladder wall is seen to contain small cystic-appearing spaces.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)62-66
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume189
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Gallbladder Neoplasms
Gallbladder
Diverticulum

Keywords

  • Adenomyomatosis
  • CT
  • Gallbladder
  • Gastrointestinal radiology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

CT differentiation of adenomyomatosis and gallbladder cancer. / Ching, Brian H.; Yeh, Benjamin M.; Westphalen, Antonio C.; Joe, Bonnie N.; Qayyum, Aliya; Coakley, Fergus.

In: American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 189, No. 1, 07.2007, p. 62-66.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ching, BH, Yeh, BM, Westphalen, AC, Joe, BN, Qayyum, A & Coakley, F 2007, 'CT differentiation of adenomyomatosis and gallbladder cancer', American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 189, no. 1, pp. 62-66. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.06.0866
Ching, Brian H. ; Yeh, Benjamin M. ; Westphalen, Antonio C. ; Joe, Bonnie N. ; Qayyum, Aliya ; Coakley, Fergus. / CT differentiation of adenomyomatosis and gallbladder cancer. In: American Journal of Roentgenology. 2007 ; Vol. 189, No. 1. pp. 62-66.
@article{44aa68532d3d456b9f761d16594872ea,
title = "CT differentiation of adenomyomatosis and gallbladder cancer",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of CT in differentiating adenomyomatosis from gallbladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We retrospectively identified the cases of 36 patients with pathologically proven adenomyomatosis (n = 22) or gallbladder cancer (n = 14) who had undergone preoperative abdominal CT. Two reviewers independently evaluated the presence and nature of morphologic gallbladder abnormalities, including the presence of intramural diverticula (i.e., small cystic-appearing spaces within the gallbladder wall). The reviewers used a five-point scale (1, definitely absent; 5, definitely present) to rate the overall likelihood of the presence of adenomyomatosis and gallbladder cancer. Ratings were dichotomized such that a diagnosis was considered present at a rating of 4 or 5 and considered absent at lower ratings. RESULTS. Reviewer 1 detected a morphologic gallbladder abnormality in 17 patients and correctly characterized the abnormality in 14 (82{\%}) of the patients (eight with adenomyomatosis and six with gallbladder cancer). Reviewer 2 detected an abnormality in 18 patients and was correct for 13 (72{\%}) of the patients (eight with adenomyomatosis and five with gallbladder cancer). In particular, reviewer 1 detected intramural diverticula in eight patients, and all had the pathologic diagnosis of adenomyomatosis, whereas reviewer 2 detected intramural diverticula in 11 patients, and eight (73{\%}) had the pathologic diagnosis of adenomyomatosis. CONCLUSION. CT is limited in the detection and differentiation of adenomyomatosis and gallbladder cancer, but the diagnosis of adenomyomatosis can be made with reasonable accuracy when thickening of the gallbladder wall is seen to contain small cystic-appearing spaces.",
keywords = "Adenomyomatosis, CT, Gallbladder, Gastrointestinal radiology",
author = "Ching, {Brian H.} and Yeh, {Benjamin M.} and Westphalen, {Antonio C.} and Joe, {Bonnie N.} and Aliya Qayyum and Fergus Coakley",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
doi = "10.2214/AJR.06.0866",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "189",
pages = "62--66",
journal = "AJR. American journal of roentgenology",
issn = "0361-803X",
publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - CT differentiation of adenomyomatosis and gallbladder cancer

AU - Ching, Brian H.

AU - Yeh, Benjamin M.

AU - Westphalen, Antonio C.

AU - Joe, Bonnie N.

AU - Qayyum, Aliya

AU - Coakley, Fergus

PY - 2007/7

Y1 - 2007/7

N2 - OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of CT in differentiating adenomyomatosis from gallbladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We retrospectively identified the cases of 36 patients with pathologically proven adenomyomatosis (n = 22) or gallbladder cancer (n = 14) who had undergone preoperative abdominal CT. Two reviewers independently evaluated the presence and nature of morphologic gallbladder abnormalities, including the presence of intramural diverticula (i.e., small cystic-appearing spaces within the gallbladder wall). The reviewers used a five-point scale (1, definitely absent; 5, definitely present) to rate the overall likelihood of the presence of adenomyomatosis and gallbladder cancer. Ratings were dichotomized such that a diagnosis was considered present at a rating of 4 or 5 and considered absent at lower ratings. RESULTS. Reviewer 1 detected a morphologic gallbladder abnormality in 17 patients and correctly characterized the abnormality in 14 (82%) of the patients (eight with adenomyomatosis and six with gallbladder cancer). Reviewer 2 detected an abnormality in 18 patients and was correct for 13 (72%) of the patients (eight with adenomyomatosis and five with gallbladder cancer). In particular, reviewer 1 detected intramural diverticula in eight patients, and all had the pathologic diagnosis of adenomyomatosis, whereas reviewer 2 detected intramural diverticula in 11 patients, and eight (73%) had the pathologic diagnosis of adenomyomatosis. CONCLUSION. CT is limited in the detection and differentiation of adenomyomatosis and gallbladder cancer, but the diagnosis of adenomyomatosis can be made with reasonable accuracy when thickening of the gallbladder wall is seen to contain small cystic-appearing spaces.

AB - OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of CT in differentiating adenomyomatosis from gallbladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We retrospectively identified the cases of 36 patients with pathologically proven adenomyomatosis (n = 22) or gallbladder cancer (n = 14) who had undergone preoperative abdominal CT. Two reviewers independently evaluated the presence and nature of morphologic gallbladder abnormalities, including the presence of intramural diverticula (i.e., small cystic-appearing spaces within the gallbladder wall). The reviewers used a five-point scale (1, definitely absent; 5, definitely present) to rate the overall likelihood of the presence of adenomyomatosis and gallbladder cancer. Ratings were dichotomized such that a diagnosis was considered present at a rating of 4 or 5 and considered absent at lower ratings. RESULTS. Reviewer 1 detected a morphologic gallbladder abnormality in 17 patients and correctly characterized the abnormality in 14 (82%) of the patients (eight with adenomyomatosis and six with gallbladder cancer). Reviewer 2 detected an abnormality in 18 patients and was correct for 13 (72%) of the patients (eight with adenomyomatosis and five with gallbladder cancer). In particular, reviewer 1 detected intramural diverticula in eight patients, and all had the pathologic diagnosis of adenomyomatosis, whereas reviewer 2 detected intramural diverticula in 11 patients, and eight (73%) had the pathologic diagnosis of adenomyomatosis. CONCLUSION. CT is limited in the detection and differentiation of adenomyomatosis and gallbladder cancer, but the diagnosis of adenomyomatosis can be made with reasonable accuracy when thickening of the gallbladder wall is seen to contain small cystic-appearing spaces.

KW - Adenomyomatosis

KW - CT

KW - Gallbladder

KW - Gastrointestinal radiology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250819918&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250819918&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2214/AJR.06.0866

DO - 10.2214/AJR.06.0866

M3 - Article

VL - 189

SP - 62

EP - 66

JO - AJR. American journal of roentgenology

JF - AJR. American journal of roentgenology

SN - 0361-803X

IS - 1

ER -