Cross-cultural comparisons of the Mini-mental State Examination between Japanese and U.S. cohorts

Hiroko Dodge, Kenichi Meguro, Hiroshi Ishii, Satoshi Yamaguchi, Judith A. Saxton, Mary Ganguli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) is widely used in Japan and the U.S.A. for cognitive screening in the clinical setting and in epidemiological studies. A previous Japanese community study reported distributions of the MMSE total score very similar to that of the U.S.A. Methods: Data were obtained from the Monongahela Valley Independent Elder's Study (MoVIES), a representative sample of community-dwelling elderly people aged 65 and older living near Pittsburgh, U.S.A., and from the Tajiri Project, with similar aims in Tajiri, Japan. We examined item-by-item distributions of the MMSE between two cohorts, comparing (1) percentage of correct answers for each item within each cohort, and (2) relative difficulty of each item measured by Item Characteristic Curve analysis (ICC), which estimates log odds of obtaining a correct answer adjusted for the remaining MMSE items, demographic variables (age, gender, education) and interactions of demographic variables and cohort. Results: Median MMSE scores were very similar between the two samples within the same education groups. However, the relative difficulty of each item differed substantially between the two cohorts. Specifically, recall and auditory comprehension were easier for the Tajiri group, but reading comprehension and sentence construction were easier for the MoVIES group. Conclusions: Our results reaffirm the importance of validation and examination of thresholds in each cohort to be studied when a common instrument is used as a dementia screening tool or for defining cognitive impairment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)113-122
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Psychogeriatrics
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2009

Fingerprint

Cross-Cultural Comparison
Japan
Demography
Independent Living
Education
Dementia
Reading
Epidemiologic Studies

Keywords

  • Community-based study
  • Cross-cultural comparison
  • MMSE

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Gerontology
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Cross-cultural comparisons of the Mini-mental State Examination between Japanese and U.S. cohorts. / Dodge, Hiroko; Meguro, Kenichi; Ishii, Hiroshi; Yamaguchi, Satoshi; Saxton, Judith A.; Ganguli, Mary.

In: International Psychogeriatrics, Vol. 21, No. 1, 02.2009, p. 113-122.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dodge, Hiroko ; Meguro, Kenichi ; Ishii, Hiroshi ; Yamaguchi, Satoshi ; Saxton, Judith A. ; Ganguli, Mary. / Cross-cultural comparisons of the Mini-mental State Examination between Japanese and U.S. cohorts. In: International Psychogeriatrics. 2009 ; Vol. 21, No. 1. pp. 113-122.
@article{76f9001966214073afb5e5bd35ddbbe7,
title = "Cross-cultural comparisons of the Mini-mental State Examination between Japanese and U.S. cohorts",
abstract = "Background: The Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) is widely used in Japan and the U.S.A. for cognitive screening in the clinical setting and in epidemiological studies. A previous Japanese community study reported distributions of the MMSE total score very similar to that of the U.S.A. Methods: Data were obtained from the Monongahela Valley Independent Elder's Study (MoVIES), a representative sample of community-dwelling elderly people aged 65 and older living near Pittsburgh, U.S.A., and from the Tajiri Project, with similar aims in Tajiri, Japan. We examined item-by-item distributions of the MMSE between two cohorts, comparing (1) percentage of correct answers for each item within each cohort, and (2) relative difficulty of each item measured by Item Characteristic Curve analysis (ICC), which estimates log odds of obtaining a correct answer adjusted for the remaining MMSE items, demographic variables (age, gender, education) and interactions of demographic variables and cohort. Results: Median MMSE scores were very similar between the two samples within the same education groups. However, the relative difficulty of each item differed substantially between the two cohorts. Specifically, recall and auditory comprehension were easier for the Tajiri group, but reading comprehension and sentence construction were easier for the MoVIES group. Conclusions: Our results reaffirm the importance of validation and examination of thresholds in each cohort to be studied when a common instrument is used as a dementia screening tool or for defining cognitive impairment.",
keywords = "Community-based study, Cross-cultural comparison, MMSE",
author = "Hiroko Dodge and Kenichi Meguro and Hiroshi Ishii and Satoshi Yamaguchi and Saxton, {Judith A.} and Mary Ganguli",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1017/S1041610208007886",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "113--122",
journal = "International Psychogeriatrics",
issn = "1041-6102",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cross-cultural comparisons of the Mini-mental State Examination between Japanese and U.S. cohorts

AU - Dodge, Hiroko

AU - Meguro, Kenichi

AU - Ishii, Hiroshi

AU - Yamaguchi, Satoshi

AU - Saxton, Judith A.

AU - Ganguli, Mary

PY - 2009/2

Y1 - 2009/2

N2 - Background: The Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) is widely used in Japan and the U.S.A. for cognitive screening in the clinical setting and in epidemiological studies. A previous Japanese community study reported distributions of the MMSE total score very similar to that of the U.S.A. Methods: Data were obtained from the Monongahela Valley Independent Elder's Study (MoVIES), a representative sample of community-dwelling elderly people aged 65 and older living near Pittsburgh, U.S.A., and from the Tajiri Project, with similar aims in Tajiri, Japan. We examined item-by-item distributions of the MMSE between two cohorts, comparing (1) percentage of correct answers for each item within each cohort, and (2) relative difficulty of each item measured by Item Characteristic Curve analysis (ICC), which estimates log odds of obtaining a correct answer adjusted for the remaining MMSE items, demographic variables (age, gender, education) and interactions of demographic variables and cohort. Results: Median MMSE scores were very similar between the two samples within the same education groups. However, the relative difficulty of each item differed substantially between the two cohorts. Specifically, recall and auditory comprehension were easier for the Tajiri group, but reading comprehension and sentence construction were easier for the MoVIES group. Conclusions: Our results reaffirm the importance of validation and examination of thresholds in each cohort to be studied when a common instrument is used as a dementia screening tool or for defining cognitive impairment.

AB - Background: The Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) is widely used in Japan and the U.S.A. for cognitive screening in the clinical setting and in epidemiological studies. A previous Japanese community study reported distributions of the MMSE total score very similar to that of the U.S.A. Methods: Data were obtained from the Monongahela Valley Independent Elder's Study (MoVIES), a representative sample of community-dwelling elderly people aged 65 and older living near Pittsburgh, U.S.A., and from the Tajiri Project, with similar aims in Tajiri, Japan. We examined item-by-item distributions of the MMSE between two cohorts, comparing (1) percentage of correct answers for each item within each cohort, and (2) relative difficulty of each item measured by Item Characteristic Curve analysis (ICC), which estimates log odds of obtaining a correct answer adjusted for the remaining MMSE items, demographic variables (age, gender, education) and interactions of demographic variables and cohort. Results: Median MMSE scores were very similar between the two samples within the same education groups. However, the relative difficulty of each item differed substantially between the two cohorts. Specifically, recall and auditory comprehension were easier for the Tajiri group, but reading comprehension and sentence construction were easier for the MoVIES group. Conclusions: Our results reaffirm the importance of validation and examination of thresholds in each cohort to be studied when a common instrument is used as a dementia screening tool or for defining cognitive impairment.

KW - Community-based study

KW - Cross-cultural comparison

KW - MMSE

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=62649132466&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=62649132466&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1041610208007886

DO - 10.1017/S1041610208007886

M3 - Article

C2 - 18925977

AN - SCOPUS:62649132466

VL - 21

SP - 113

EP - 122

JO - International Psychogeriatrics

JF - International Psychogeriatrics

SN - 1041-6102

IS - 1

ER -