Critical Care Nutrition Support Best Practices: Key Differences between Canadian and American Guidelines

Jayshil J. Patel, Margot Lemieux, Stephen A. McClave, Robert Martindale, Ryan T. Hurt, Daren K. Heyland

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since 2015, Society of Critical Care Medicine/American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition and Canadian critical care nutrition support guidelines have both been updated. Despite a similar evidentiary basis, there remain key differences between guideline recommendations. These differences in recommendations may pose confusion for the clinician and may encumber widespread applicability. The aim of this review was to enhance practitioner confidence in applying critical care nutrition support guidelines to patient care in their settings by outlining the similarities and differences between the American and Canadian methods for guideline development and describing the key differences and reasons behind the differences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)633-644
Number of pages12
JournalNutrition in Clinical Practice
Volume32
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2017

Fingerprint

Nutrition Policy
Critical Care
Practice Guidelines
Guidelines
Patient Care

Keywords

  • critical care
  • critical care outcomes
  • enteral nutrition
  • guidelines
  • nutritional support
  • outcomes
  • parenteral nutrition
  • practice guideline

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Cite this

Critical Care Nutrition Support Best Practices : Key Differences between Canadian and American Guidelines. / Patel, Jayshil J.; Lemieux, Margot; McClave, Stephen A.; Martindale, Robert; Hurt, Ryan T.; Heyland, Daren K.

In: Nutrition in Clinical Practice, Vol. 32, No. 5, 01.10.2017, p. 633-644.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Patel, Jayshil J. ; Lemieux, Margot ; McClave, Stephen A. ; Martindale, Robert ; Hurt, Ryan T. ; Heyland, Daren K. / Critical Care Nutrition Support Best Practices : Key Differences between Canadian and American Guidelines. In: Nutrition in Clinical Practice. 2017 ; Vol. 32, No. 5. pp. 633-644.
@article{fc3e85091d974ad4ae21eabe663fce9e,
title = "Critical Care Nutrition Support Best Practices: Key Differences between Canadian and American Guidelines",
abstract = "Since 2015, Society of Critical Care Medicine/American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition and Canadian critical care nutrition support guidelines have both been updated. Despite a similar evidentiary basis, there remain key differences between guideline recommendations. These differences in recommendations may pose confusion for the clinician and may encumber widespread applicability. The aim of this review was to enhance practitioner confidence in applying critical care nutrition support guidelines to patient care in their settings by outlining the similarities and differences between the American and Canadian methods for guideline development and describing the key differences and reasons behind the differences.",
keywords = "critical care, critical care outcomes, enteral nutrition, guidelines, nutritional support, outcomes, parenteral nutrition, practice guideline",
author = "Patel, {Jayshil J.} and Margot Lemieux and McClave, {Stephen A.} and Robert Martindale and Hurt, {Ryan T.} and Heyland, {Daren K.}",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0884533617722165",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "633--644",
journal = "Nutrition in Clinical Practice",
issn = "0884-5336",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Critical Care Nutrition Support Best Practices

T2 - Key Differences between Canadian and American Guidelines

AU - Patel, Jayshil J.

AU - Lemieux, Margot

AU - McClave, Stephen A.

AU - Martindale, Robert

AU - Hurt, Ryan T.

AU - Heyland, Daren K.

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - Since 2015, Society of Critical Care Medicine/American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition and Canadian critical care nutrition support guidelines have both been updated. Despite a similar evidentiary basis, there remain key differences between guideline recommendations. These differences in recommendations may pose confusion for the clinician and may encumber widespread applicability. The aim of this review was to enhance practitioner confidence in applying critical care nutrition support guidelines to patient care in their settings by outlining the similarities and differences between the American and Canadian methods for guideline development and describing the key differences and reasons behind the differences.

AB - Since 2015, Society of Critical Care Medicine/American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition and Canadian critical care nutrition support guidelines have both been updated. Despite a similar evidentiary basis, there remain key differences between guideline recommendations. These differences in recommendations may pose confusion for the clinician and may encumber widespread applicability. The aim of this review was to enhance practitioner confidence in applying critical care nutrition support guidelines to patient care in their settings by outlining the similarities and differences between the American and Canadian methods for guideline development and describing the key differences and reasons behind the differences.

KW - critical care

KW - critical care outcomes

KW - enteral nutrition

KW - guidelines

KW - nutritional support

KW - outcomes

KW - parenteral nutrition

KW - practice guideline

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029743332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029743332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0884533617722165

DO - 10.1177/0884533617722165

M3 - Review article

C2 - 28820650

AN - SCOPUS:85029743332

VL - 32

SP - 633

EP - 644

JO - Nutrition in Clinical Practice

JF - Nutrition in Clinical Practice

SN - 0884-5336

IS - 5

ER -