Critical Appraisal of Emergency Medicine Educational Research

The Best Publications of 2016

Nicole M. Dubosh, Jaime Jordan, Lalena Yarris, Edward Ullman, Joshua Kornegay, Daniel Runde, Amy Miller Juve, Jonathan Fisher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives were to critically appraise the emergency medicine (EM) medical education literature published in 2016 and review the highest-quality quantitative and qualitative studies. Methods: A search of the English language literature in 2016 querying MEDLINE, Scopus, Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), and PsychInfo identified 510 papers related to medical education in EM. Two reviewers independently screened all of the publications using previously established exclusion criteria. The 25 top-scoring quantitative studies based on methodology and all six qualitative studies were scored by all reviewers using selected scoring criteria that have been adapted from previous installments. The top-scoring articles were highlighted and trends in medical education research were described. Results: Seventy-five manuscripts met inclusion criteria and were scored. Eleven quantitative and one qualitative papers were the highest scoring and are summarized in this article. Conclusion: This annual critical appraisal series highlights the best EM education research articles published in 2016.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)58-73
Number of pages16
JournalAEM Education and Training
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Emergency Medicine
Medical Education
educational research
Publications
medicine
Research
Education
Information Centers
education
Manuscripts
MEDLINE
Biomedical Research
Language
information center
English language
exclusion
inclusion
methodology
trend
resources

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Emergency

Cite this

Critical Appraisal of Emergency Medicine Educational Research : The Best Publications of 2016. / Dubosh, Nicole M.; Jordan, Jaime; Yarris, Lalena; Ullman, Edward; Kornegay, Joshua; Runde, Daniel; Juve, Amy Miller; Fisher, Jonathan.

In: AEM Education and Training, Vol. 3, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 58-73.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dubosh, NM, Jordan, J, Yarris, L, Ullman, E, Kornegay, J, Runde, D, Juve, AM & Fisher, J 2019, 'Critical Appraisal of Emergency Medicine Educational Research: The Best Publications of 2016', AEM Education and Training, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 58-73. https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10203
Dubosh, Nicole M. ; Jordan, Jaime ; Yarris, Lalena ; Ullman, Edward ; Kornegay, Joshua ; Runde, Daniel ; Juve, Amy Miller ; Fisher, Jonathan. / Critical Appraisal of Emergency Medicine Educational Research : The Best Publications of 2016. In: AEM Education and Training. 2019 ; Vol. 3, No. 1. pp. 58-73.
@article{695f3d9b12594a0a9cadc29cd03ef2de,
title = "Critical Appraisal of Emergency Medicine Educational Research: The Best Publications of 2016",
abstract = "Objectives: The objectives were to critically appraise the emergency medicine (EM) medical education literature published in 2016 and review the highest-quality quantitative and qualitative studies. Methods: A search of the English language literature in 2016 querying MEDLINE, Scopus, Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), and PsychInfo identified 510 papers related to medical education in EM. Two reviewers independently screened all of the publications using previously established exclusion criteria. The 25 top-scoring quantitative studies based on methodology and all six qualitative studies were scored by all reviewers using selected scoring criteria that have been adapted from previous installments. The top-scoring articles were highlighted and trends in medical education research were described. Results: Seventy-five manuscripts met inclusion criteria and were scored. Eleven quantitative and one qualitative papers were the highest scoring and are summarized in this article. Conclusion: This annual critical appraisal series highlights the best EM education research articles published in 2016.",
author = "Dubosh, {Nicole M.} and Jaime Jordan and Lalena Yarris and Edward Ullman and Joshua Kornegay and Daniel Runde and Juve, {Amy Miller} and Jonathan Fisher",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/aet2.10203",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "58--73",
journal = "AEM Education and Training",
issn = "2472-5390",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Critical Appraisal of Emergency Medicine Educational Research

T2 - The Best Publications of 2016

AU - Dubosh, Nicole M.

AU - Jordan, Jaime

AU - Yarris, Lalena

AU - Ullman, Edward

AU - Kornegay, Joshua

AU - Runde, Daniel

AU - Juve, Amy Miller

AU - Fisher, Jonathan

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objectives: The objectives were to critically appraise the emergency medicine (EM) medical education literature published in 2016 and review the highest-quality quantitative and qualitative studies. Methods: A search of the English language literature in 2016 querying MEDLINE, Scopus, Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), and PsychInfo identified 510 papers related to medical education in EM. Two reviewers independently screened all of the publications using previously established exclusion criteria. The 25 top-scoring quantitative studies based on methodology and all six qualitative studies were scored by all reviewers using selected scoring criteria that have been adapted from previous installments. The top-scoring articles were highlighted and trends in medical education research were described. Results: Seventy-five manuscripts met inclusion criteria and were scored. Eleven quantitative and one qualitative papers were the highest scoring and are summarized in this article. Conclusion: This annual critical appraisal series highlights the best EM education research articles published in 2016.

AB - Objectives: The objectives were to critically appraise the emergency medicine (EM) medical education literature published in 2016 and review the highest-quality quantitative and qualitative studies. Methods: A search of the English language literature in 2016 querying MEDLINE, Scopus, Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), and PsychInfo identified 510 papers related to medical education in EM. Two reviewers independently screened all of the publications using previously established exclusion criteria. The 25 top-scoring quantitative studies based on methodology and all six qualitative studies were scored by all reviewers using selected scoring criteria that have been adapted from previous installments. The top-scoring articles were highlighted and trends in medical education research were described. Results: Seventy-five manuscripts met inclusion criteria and were scored. Eleven quantitative and one qualitative papers were the highest scoring and are summarized in this article. Conclusion: This annual critical appraisal series highlights the best EM education research articles published in 2016.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062979010&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062979010&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/aet2.10203

DO - 10.1002/aet2.10203

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 58

EP - 73

JO - AEM Education and Training

JF - AEM Education and Training

SN - 2472-5390

IS - 1

ER -