Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research

Elena M. Andresen

doi:10.1053/apmr.2000.20619

Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research

Elena M. Andresen

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

595 Scopus citations

Abstract

To recommend instrument assessment criteria, deriving from psychometric textbooks and articles and disability and research experts, for reviewing and assessing surveys and questionnaires for disability outcomes research. Traditional criteria are recommended, including psychometric properties of validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change, as are newer statistical methods for assessing scaling properties, such as Rasch analysis. Special consideration is needed for generic instruments that may be poorly scaled for disability research. Pragmatic aspects of data collection, including acceptability and disability accommodation, also are recommended. (C) 2000 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	S15-S20
Journal	Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume	81
Issue number	12 SUPPL. 2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2000.20619
State	Published - 2000
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Disabled persons
Outcome assessment (health care)
Rehabilitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation

Access to Document

10.1053/apmr.2000.20619

Cite this

@article{a8c8765269fb4a32b8362413f63a80c4,

title = "Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research",

abstract = "To recommend instrument assessment criteria, deriving from psychometric textbooks and articles and disability and research experts, for reviewing and assessing surveys and questionnaires for disability outcomes research. Traditional criteria are recommended, including psychometric properties of validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change, as are newer statistical methods for assessing scaling properties, such as Rasch analysis. Special consideration is needed for generic instruments that may be poorly scaled for disability research. Pragmatic aspects of data collection, including acceptability and disability accommodation, also are recommended. (C) 2000 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine.",

keywords = "Disabled persons, Outcome assessment (health care), Rehabilitation",

author = "Andresen, {Elena M.}",

note = "Funding Information: Funded, in part, by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention through the Saint Louis University Prevention Research Center (grants no. U48/CCU710806, R13/CCR717040-01), and by the American Association of Spinal Cord Injury Psychologists and Social Workers. ",

year = "2000",

doi = "10.1053/apmr.2000.20619",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "81",

pages = "S15--S20",

journal = "Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",

issn = "0003-9993",

publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",

number = "12 SUPPL. 2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research

AU - Andresen, Elena M.

N1 - Funding Information: Funded, in part, by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention through the Saint Louis University Prevention Research Center (grants no. U48/CCU710806, R13/CCR717040-01), and by the American Association of Spinal Cord Injury Psychologists and Social Workers.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - To recommend instrument assessment criteria, deriving from psychometric textbooks and articles and disability and research experts, for reviewing and assessing surveys and questionnaires for disability outcomes research. Traditional criteria are recommended, including psychometric properties of validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change, as are newer statistical methods for assessing scaling properties, such as Rasch analysis. Special consideration is needed for generic instruments that may be poorly scaled for disability research. Pragmatic aspects of data collection, including acceptability and disability accommodation, also are recommended. (C) 2000 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine.

AB - To recommend instrument assessment criteria, deriving from psychometric textbooks and articles and disability and research experts, for reviewing and assessing surveys and questionnaires for disability outcomes research. Traditional criteria are recommended, including psychometric properties of validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change, as are newer statistical methods for assessing scaling properties, such as Rasch analysis. Special consideration is needed for generic instruments that may be poorly scaled for disability research. Pragmatic aspects of data collection, including acceptability and disability accommodation, also are recommended. (C) 2000 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine.

KW - Disabled persons

KW - Outcome assessment (health care)

KW - Rehabilitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033637308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033637308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/apmr.2000.20619

DO - 10.1053/apmr.2000.20619

M3 - Article

C2 - 11128900

AN - SCOPUS:0033637308

VL - 81

SP - S15-S20

JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0003-9993

IS - 12 SUPPL. 2

ER -

Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this