Criteria Currently Used to Evaluate Dispatch Triage Systems: Where Do They Leave Us?

Terri Schmidt, David C. Cone, N. Clay Mann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Some emergency medical services (EMS) systems are interested in considering the possibility of triaging some patients who call an emergency dispatch center to alternatives to the traditional emergency response, but concerns exist about the safety of that triage. In January 2003, the Neely Conference was held in association with the National Association of EMS Physicians annual meeting in Panama City, Florida. The Neely Conference began the process of developing criteria to be used in research studies evaluating dispatch and field triage systems. Various outcome measures have been used, including expert opinion, patient interviews, specific patient complaints, field findings and interventions, and emergency department or hospital outcomes. This commentary reviews the methods used in the current literature to evaluate dispatch triage systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)126-129
Number of pages4
JournalPrehospital Emergency Care
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2004

Fingerprint

Triage
Emergencies
Panama
Expert Testimony
Emergency Medical Services
Hospital Emergency Service
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Interviews
Safety
Research

Keywords

  • Dispatch
  • Emergency medical services
  • Triage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Criteria Currently Used to Evaluate Dispatch Triage Systems : Where Do They Leave Us? / Schmidt, Terri; Cone, David C.; Mann, N. Clay.

In: Prehospital Emergency Care, Vol. 8, No. 2, 04.2004, p. 126-129.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schmidt, Terri ; Cone, David C. ; Mann, N. Clay. / Criteria Currently Used to Evaluate Dispatch Triage Systems : Where Do They Leave Us?. In: Prehospital Emergency Care. 2004 ; Vol. 8, No. 2. pp. 126-129.
@article{1a06b1a7d43046b6890fc47fdde06dd4,
title = "Criteria Currently Used to Evaluate Dispatch Triage Systems: Where Do They Leave Us?",
abstract = "Some emergency medical services (EMS) systems are interested in considering the possibility of triaging some patients who call an emergency dispatch center to alternatives to the traditional emergency response, but concerns exist about the safety of that triage. In January 2003, the Neely Conference was held in association with the National Association of EMS Physicians annual meeting in Panama City, Florida. The Neely Conference began the process of developing criteria to be used in research studies evaluating dispatch and field triage systems. Various outcome measures have been used, including expert opinion, patient interviews, specific patient complaints, field findings and interventions, and emergency department or hospital outcomes. This commentary reviews the methods used in the current literature to evaluate dispatch triage systems.",
keywords = "Dispatch, Emergency medical services, Triage",
author = "Terri Schmidt and Cone, {David C.} and Mann, {N. Clay}",
year = "2004",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.prehos.2003.12.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "126--129",
journal = "Prehospital Emergency Care",
issn = "1090-3127",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Criteria Currently Used to Evaluate Dispatch Triage Systems

T2 - Where Do They Leave Us?

AU - Schmidt, Terri

AU - Cone, David C.

AU - Mann, N. Clay

PY - 2004/4

Y1 - 2004/4

N2 - Some emergency medical services (EMS) systems are interested in considering the possibility of triaging some patients who call an emergency dispatch center to alternatives to the traditional emergency response, but concerns exist about the safety of that triage. In January 2003, the Neely Conference was held in association with the National Association of EMS Physicians annual meeting in Panama City, Florida. The Neely Conference began the process of developing criteria to be used in research studies evaluating dispatch and field triage systems. Various outcome measures have been used, including expert opinion, patient interviews, specific patient complaints, field findings and interventions, and emergency department or hospital outcomes. This commentary reviews the methods used in the current literature to evaluate dispatch triage systems.

AB - Some emergency medical services (EMS) systems are interested in considering the possibility of triaging some patients who call an emergency dispatch center to alternatives to the traditional emergency response, but concerns exist about the safety of that triage. In January 2003, the Neely Conference was held in association with the National Association of EMS Physicians annual meeting in Panama City, Florida. The Neely Conference began the process of developing criteria to be used in research studies evaluating dispatch and field triage systems. Various outcome measures have been used, including expert opinion, patient interviews, specific patient complaints, field findings and interventions, and emergency department or hospital outcomes. This commentary reviews the methods used in the current literature to evaluate dispatch triage systems.

KW - Dispatch

KW - Emergency medical services

KW - Triage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=16544361936&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=16544361936&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.prehos.2003.12.003

DO - 10.1016/j.prehos.2003.12.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 15060845

AN - SCOPUS:16544361936

VL - 8

SP - 126

EP - 129

JO - Prehospital Emergency Care

JF - Prehospital Emergency Care

SN - 1090-3127

IS - 2

ER -