Criminality among individuals arraigned for drinking and driving in Massachusetts

M. Argeriou, Dennis McCarty, E. Blacker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Criminal record searches of 1406 randomly selected driving under the influence of liquor (DUIL) offenders in Massachusetts revealed a history of prior court arraignments in 76.5% of the cases. Half (51.2%) had been arraigned for criminal offenses other than or in addition to traffic and DUIL, and one-fourth (27.7%) had been previously arraigned for DUIL. Among those with prior DUIL arrests, 68% also had criminal arrests. A 3-year follow-up indicated that 63% of those rearrested for DUIL had prior criminal arrests. Eight subgroups of offenders were created by categorizing the sample according to the presence or absence of criminal, traffic and prior DUIL offenses. Rates of recidivism differed among the subgroups and illustrated the utility of using criminal history data to differentiate DUIL offenders. The need to develop alternative court management-rehabilitation strategies responsive to subgroup differences is discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)525-530
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Studies on Alcohol
Volume46
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1985
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Criminality
Patient rehabilitation
offender
offense
traffic
Driving Under the Influence
rehabilitation
Rehabilitation
history
management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Criminality among individuals arraigned for drinking and driving in Massachusetts. / Argeriou, M.; McCarty, Dennis; Blacker, E.

In: Journal of Studies on Alcohol, Vol. 46, No. 6, 1985, p. 525-530.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d1a8a3ee0ab34068b42c178dcad720eb,
title = "Criminality among individuals arraigned for drinking and driving in Massachusetts",
abstract = "Criminal record searches of 1406 randomly selected driving under the influence of liquor (DUIL) offenders in Massachusetts revealed a history of prior court arraignments in 76.5{\%} of the cases. Half (51.2{\%}) had been arraigned for criminal offenses other than or in addition to traffic and DUIL, and one-fourth (27.7{\%}) had been previously arraigned for DUIL. Among those with prior DUIL arrests, 68{\%} also had criminal arrests. A 3-year follow-up indicated that 63{\%} of those rearrested for DUIL had prior criminal arrests. Eight subgroups of offenders were created by categorizing the sample according to the presence or absence of criminal, traffic and prior DUIL offenses. Rates of recidivism differed among the subgroups and illustrated the utility of using criminal history data to differentiate DUIL offenders. The need to develop alternative court management-rehabilitation strategies responsive to subgroup differences is discussed.",
author = "M. Argeriou and Dennis McCarty and E. Blacker",
year = "1985",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "525--530",
journal = "Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs",
issn = "1937-1888",
publisher = "Alcohol Research Documentation, Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Criminality among individuals arraigned for drinking and driving in Massachusetts

AU - Argeriou, M.

AU - McCarty, Dennis

AU - Blacker, E.

PY - 1985

Y1 - 1985

N2 - Criminal record searches of 1406 randomly selected driving under the influence of liquor (DUIL) offenders in Massachusetts revealed a history of prior court arraignments in 76.5% of the cases. Half (51.2%) had been arraigned for criminal offenses other than or in addition to traffic and DUIL, and one-fourth (27.7%) had been previously arraigned for DUIL. Among those with prior DUIL arrests, 68% also had criminal arrests. A 3-year follow-up indicated that 63% of those rearrested for DUIL had prior criminal arrests. Eight subgroups of offenders were created by categorizing the sample according to the presence or absence of criminal, traffic and prior DUIL offenses. Rates of recidivism differed among the subgroups and illustrated the utility of using criminal history data to differentiate DUIL offenders. The need to develop alternative court management-rehabilitation strategies responsive to subgroup differences is discussed.

AB - Criminal record searches of 1406 randomly selected driving under the influence of liquor (DUIL) offenders in Massachusetts revealed a history of prior court arraignments in 76.5% of the cases. Half (51.2%) had been arraigned for criminal offenses other than or in addition to traffic and DUIL, and one-fourth (27.7%) had been previously arraigned for DUIL. Among those with prior DUIL arrests, 68% also had criminal arrests. A 3-year follow-up indicated that 63% of those rearrested for DUIL had prior criminal arrests. Eight subgroups of offenders were created by categorizing the sample according to the presence or absence of criminal, traffic and prior DUIL offenses. Rates of recidivism differed among the subgroups and illustrated the utility of using criminal history data to differentiate DUIL offenders. The need to develop alternative court management-rehabilitation strategies responsive to subgroup differences is discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022378010&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022378010&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 4087915

AN - SCOPUS:0022378010

VL - 46

SP - 525

EP - 530

JO - Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs

JF - Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs

SN - 1937-1888

IS - 6

ER -