Could We Have Known? A Qualitative Analysis of Data from Women Who Survived an Attempted Homicide by an Intimate Partner

Christina Nicolaidis, Mary Ann Curry, Yvonne Ulrich, Phyllis Sharps, Judith McFarlane, Doris Campbell, Faye Gary, Kathryn Laughon, Nancy Glass, Jacquelyn Campbell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

61 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine in-depth the lives of women whose partners attempted to kill them, and to identify patterns that may aid in the clinician's ability to predict, prevent, or counsel about femicide or attempted femicide. DESIGN: Qualitative analysis of 30 in-depth interviews. SETTING: Six U.S. cities. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty women, aged 17-54 years, who survived an attempted homicide by an intimate partner. RESULTS: All but 2 of the participants had previously experienced physical violence, controlling behavior, or both from the partner who attempted to kill them. The intensity of the violence, control, and threats varied greatly, as did the number of risk factors measured by the Danger Assessment, defining a wide spectrum of prior abuse. Approximately half (14/30) of the participants did not recognize that their lives were in danger. Women often focused more on relationship problems involving money, alcohol, drugs, possessiveness, or infidelity, than on the risk to themselves from the violence. The majority of the attempts (22/30) happened around the time of a relationship change, but the relationship was often ending because of problems other than violence. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should not be falsely reassured by a woman's sense of safety, by the lack of a history of severe violence, or by the presence of few classic risk factors for homicide. Efforts to reduce femicide risk that are targeted only at those women seeking help for violence-related problems may miss potential victims.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)788-794
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume18
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2003

Fingerprint

Homicide
Violence
Alcohols
Interviews
Safety
Pharmaceutical Preparations

Keywords

  • Attempted femicide
  • Intimate partner violence
  • Mortality
  • Qualitative research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Could We Have Known? A Qualitative Analysis of Data from Women Who Survived an Attempted Homicide by an Intimate Partner. / Nicolaidis, Christina; Curry, Mary Ann; Ulrich, Yvonne; Sharps, Phyllis; McFarlane, Judith; Campbell, Doris; Gary, Faye; Laughon, Kathryn; Glass, Nancy; Campbell, Jacquelyn.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 18, No. 10, 01.10.2003, p. 788-794.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nicolaidis, C, Curry, MA, Ulrich, Y, Sharps, P, McFarlane, J, Campbell, D, Gary, F, Laughon, K, Glass, N & Campbell, J 2003, 'Could We Have Known? A Qualitative Analysis of Data from Women Who Survived an Attempted Homicide by an Intimate Partner', Journal of General Internal Medicine, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 788-794. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.21202.x
Nicolaidis, Christina ; Curry, Mary Ann ; Ulrich, Yvonne ; Sharps, Phyllis ; McFarlane, Judith ; Campbell, Doris ; Gary, Faye ; Laughon, Kathryn ; Glass, Nancy ; Campbell, Jacquelyn. / Could We Have Known? A Qualitative Analysis of Data from Women Who Survived an Attempted Homicide by an Intimate Partner. In: Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2003 ; Vol. 18, No. 10. pp. 788-794.
@article{33c5ea2eb5f9491b9024acd18c29ecd8,
title = "Could We Have Known? A Qualitative Analysis of Data from Women Who Survived an Attempted Homicide by an Intimate Partner",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To examine in-depth the lives of women whose partners attempted to kill them, and to identify patterns that may aid in the clinician's ability to predict, prevent, or counsel about femicide or attempted femicide. DESIGN: Qualitative analysis of 30 in-depth interviews. SETTING: Six U.S. cities. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty women, aged 17-54 years, who survived an attempted homicide by an intimate partner. RESULTS: All but 2 of the participants had previously experienced physical violence, controlling behavior, or both from the partner who attempted to kill them. The intensity of the violence, control, and threats varied greatly, as did the number of risk factors measured by the Danger Assessment, defining a wide spectrum of prior abuse. Approximately half (14/30) of the participants did not recognize that their lives were in danger. Women often focused more on relationship problems involving money, alcohol, drugs, possessiveness, or infidelity, than on the risk to themselves from the violence. The majority of the attempts (22/30) happened around the time of a relationship change, but the relationship was often ending because of problems other than violence. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should not be falsely reassured by a woman's sense of safety, by the lack of a history of severe violence, or by the presence of few classic risk factors for homicide. Efforts to reduce femicide risk that are targeted only at those women seeking help for violence-related problems may miss potential victims.",
keywords = "Attempted femicide, Intimate partner violence, Mortality, Qualitative research",
author = "Christina Nicolaidis and Curry, {Mary Ann} and Yvonne Ulrich and Phyllis Sharps and Judith McFarlane and Doris Campbell and Faye Gary and Kathryn Laughon and Nancy Glass and Jacquelyn Campbell",
year = "2003",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.21202.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "788--794",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Could We Have Known? A Qualitative Analysis of Data from Women Who Survived an Attempted Homicide by an Intimate Partner

AU - Nicolaidis, Christina

AU - Curry, Mary Ann

AU - Ulrich, Yvonne

AU - Sharps, Phyllis

AU - McFarlane, Judith

AU - Campbell, Doris

AU - Gary, Faye

AU - Laughon, Kathryn

AU - Glass, Nancy

AU - Campbell, Jacquelyn

PY - 2003/10/1

Y1 - 2003/10/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To examine in-depth the lives of women whose partners attempted to kill them, and to identify patterns that may aid in the clinician's ability to predict, prevent, or counsel about femicide or attempted femicide. DESIGN: Qualitative analysis of 30 in-depth interviews. SETTING: Six U.S. cities. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty women, aged 17-54 years, who survived an attempted homicide by an intimate partner. RESULTS: All but 2 of the participants had previously experienced physical violence, controlling behavior, or both from the partner who attempted to kill them. The intensity of the violence, control, and threats varied greatly, as did the number of risk factors measured by the Danger Assessment, defining a wide spectrum of prior abuse. Approximately half (14/30) of the participants did not recognize that their lives were in danger. Women often focused more on relationship problems involving money, alcohol, drugs, possessiveness, or infidelity, than on the risk to themselves from the violence. The majority of the attempts (22/30) happened around the time of a relationship change, but the relationship was often ending because of problems other than violence. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should not be falsely reassured by a woman's sense of safety, by the lack of a history of severe violence, or by the presence of few classic risk factors for homicide. Efforts to reduce femicide risk that are targeted only at those women seeking help for violence-related problems may miss potential victims.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To examine in-depth the lives of women whose partners attempted to kill them, and to identify patterns that may aid in the clinician's ability to predict, prevent, or counsel about femicide or attempted femicide. DESIGN: Qualitative analysis of 30 in-depth interviews. SETTING: Six U.S. cities. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty women, aged 17-54 years, who survived an attempted homicide by an intimate partner. RESULTS: All but 2 of the participants had previously experienced physical violence, controlling behavior, or both from the partner who attempted to kill them. The intensity of the violence, control, and threats varied greatly, as did the number of risk factors measured by the Danger Assessment, defining a wide spectrum of prior abuse. Approximately half (14/30) of the participants did not recognize that their lives were in danger. Women often focused more on relationship problems involving money, alcohol, drugs, possessiveness, or infidelity, than on the risk to themselves from the violence. The majority of the attempts (22/30) happened around the time of a relationship change, but the relationship was often ending because of problems other than violence. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should not be falsely reassured by a woman's sense of safety, by the lack of a history of severe violence, or by the presence of few classic risk factors for homicide. Efforts to reduce femicide risk that are targeted only at those women seeking help for violence-related problems may miss potential victims.

KW - Attempted femicide

KW - Intimate partner violence

KW - Mortality

KW - Qualitative research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=10744233744&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=10744233744&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.21202.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.21202.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 14521640

AN - SCOPUS:10744233744

VL - 18

SP - 788

EP - 794

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 10

ER -