Cost-utility analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis

Elijah Dixon; Dennis L. Fowler; Gabriela Ghitulescu; N. N. Baxter; K. J. Brasel; C. J. Brown; P. Chaudhury; C. S. Cutter; C. M. Divino; L. Dubois; G. W.N. Fitzgerald; H. J.A. Henteleff; A. W. Kirkpatrick; S. Latosinsky; A. R. MacLean; T. M. Mastracci; R. S. McLeod; A. M. Morris; L. A. Neumayer; L. K. Temple; M. E. McKenzie

doi:10.1503/cjs.012012

Cost-utility analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis

Elijah Dixon, Dennis L. Fowler, Gabriela Ghitulescu, N. N. Baxter, K. J. Brasel, C. J. Brown, P. Chaudhury, C. S. Cutter, C. M. Divino, L. Dubois, G. W.N. Fitzgerald, H. J.A. Henteleff, A. W. Kirkpatrick, S. Latosinsky, A. R. MacLean, T. M. Mastracci, R. S. McLeod, A. M. Morris, L. A. Neumayer, L. K. TempleM. E. McKenzie

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

5 Scopus citations

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	204-206
Number of pages	3
Journal	Canadian Journal of Surgery
Volume	55
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.012012
State	Published - Jun 1 2012
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Surgery

Access to Document

10.1503/cjs.012012

Cite this

Dixon, E., Fowler, D. L., Ghitulescu, G., Baxter, N. N., Brasel, K. J., Brown, C. J., Chaudhury, P., Cutter, C. S., Divino, C. M., Dubois, L., Fitzgerald, G. W. N., Henteleff, H. J. A., Kirkpatrick, A. W., Latosinsky, S., MacLean, A. R., Mastracci, T. M., McLeod, R. S., Morris, A. M., Neumayer, L. A., ... McKenzie, M. E. (2012). Cost-utility analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 55(3), 204-206. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.012012

Dixon, E, Fowler, DL, Ghitulescu, G, Baxter, NN, Brasel, KJ, Brown, CJ, Chaudhury, P, Cutter, CS, Divino, CM, Dubois, L, Fitzgerald, GWN, Henteleff, HJA, Kirkpatrick, AW, Latosinsky, S, MacLean, AR, Mastracci, TM, McLeod, RS, Morris, AM, Neumayer, LA, Temple, LK & McKenzie, ME 2012, 'Cost-utility analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis', Canadian Journal of Surgery, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 204-206. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.012012

@article{01fa6ecb10854356a3c0747bd07e0871,

title = "Cost-utility analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis",

author = "Elijah Dixon and Fowler, {Dennis L.} and Gabriela Ghitulescu and Baxter, {N. N.} and Brasel, {K. J.} and Brown, {C. J.} and P. Chaudhury and Cutter, {C. S.} and Divino, {C. M.} and L. Dubois and Fitzgerald, {G. W.N.} and Henteleff, {H. J.A.} and Kirkpatrick, {A. W.} and S. Latosinsky and MacLean, {A. R.} and Mastracci, {T. M.} and McLeod, {R. S.} and Morris, {A. M.} and Neumayer, {L. A.} and Temple, {L. K.} and McKenzie, {M. E.}",

note = "Funding Information: Evidence Based Reviews in Surgery (EBRS) is a program jointly sponsored by the Canadian Association of General Surgeons (CAGS) and the American College of Surgeons (ACS) and is supported by an educational grant from ETHICON and ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, both units of Johnson & Johnson Medical Products, a division of Johnson & Johnson and ETHICON Inc. and ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY Inc., divisions of Johnson & Johnson Inc. The primary objective of EBRS is to help practising surgeons improve their critical appraisal skills. During the academic year, 8 clinical articles are chosen for review and discussion. They are selected for their clinical relevance to general surgeons and because they cover a spectrum of issues important to surgeons, including causation or risk factors for disease, natural history or prognosis of disease, how to quantify disease, diagnostic tests, early diagnosis and the effectiveness of treatment. A methodological article guides the reader in critical appraisal of the clinical article. Methodological and clinical reviews of the article are performed by experts in the relevant areas and posted on the EBRS website, where they are archived indefinitely. In addition, a listserv allows participants to discuss the monthly article. Surgeons who participate in the monthly packages can obtain Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada Maintenance of Certification credits and/or continuing medical education credits for the current article only by reading the monthly articles, participating in the listserv discussion, reading the methodological and clinical reviews and completing the monthly online evaluation and multiple choice questions. ",

year = "2012",

month = jun,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1503/cjs.012012",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "55",

pages = "204--206",

journal = "Canadian Journal of Surgery",

issn = "0008-428X",

publisher = "Canadian Medical Association",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cost-utility analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis

AU - Dixon, Elijah

AU - Fowler, Dennis L.

AU - Ghitulescu, Gabriela

AU - Baxter, N. N.

AU - Brasel, K. J.

AU - Brown, C. J.

AU - Chaudhury, P.

AU - Cutter, C. S.

AU - Divino, C. M.

AU - Dubois, L.

AU - Fitzgerald, G. W.N.

AU - Henteleff, H. J.A.

AU - Kirkpatrick, A. W.

AU - Latosinsky, S.

AU - MacLean, A. R.

AU - Mastracci, T. M.

AU - McLeod, R. S.

AU - Morris, A. M.

AU - Neumayer, L. A.

AU - Temple, L. K.

AU - McKenzie, M. E.

N1 - Funding Information: Evidence Based Reviews in Surgery (EBRS) is a program jointly sponsored by the Canadian Association of General Surgeons (CAGS) and the American College of Surgeons (ACS) and is supported by an educational grant from ETHICON and ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, both units of Johnson & Johnson Medical Products, a division of Johnson & Johnson and ETHICON Inc. and ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY Inc., divisions of Johnson & Johnson Inc. The primary objective of EBRS is to help practising surgeons improve their critical appraisal skills. During the academic year, 8 clinical articles are chosen for review and discussion. They are selected for their clinical relevance to general surgeons and because they cover a spectrum of issues important to surgeons, including causation or risk factors for disease, natural history or prognosis of disease, how to quantify disease, diagnostic tests, early diagnosis and the effectiveness of treatment. A methodological article guides the reader in critical appraisal of the clinical article. Methodological and clinical reviews of the article are performed by experts in the relevant areas and posted on the EBRS website, where they are archived indefinitely. In addition, a listserv allows participants to discuss the monthly article. Surgeons who participate in the monthly packages can obtain Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada Maintenance of Certification credits and/or continuing medical education credits for the current article only by reading the monthly articles, participating in the listserv discussion, reading the methodological and clinical reviews and completing the monthly online evaluation and multiple choice questions.

PY - 2012/6/1

Y1 - 2012/6/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863609774&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863609774&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1503/cjs.012012

DO - 10.1503/cjs.012012

M3 - Article

C2 - 22630063

AN - SCOPUS:84863609774

SN - 0008-428X

VL - 55

SP - 204

EP - 206

JO - Canadian Journal of Surgery

JF - Canadian Journal of Surgery

IS - 3

ER -

Cost-utility analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this