Cost-effectiveness of lumbar discectomy for the treatment of herniated intervertebral disc

A. D. Malter, E. B. Larson, N. Urban, Richard (Rick) Deyo, R. E. Clark

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

107 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design. A cost-effectiveness analysis of lumbar discectomy based on existing efficacy data and newly gathered cost data. Objectives. For patients with herniated lumbar discs unresponsive to conservative management, surgery relieves pain more rapidly but at higher costs than continued medical therapy. We evaluated the coat-effectiveness of lumbar discectomy for these patients. Summary of Background Data. Effectiveness estimates were based on the results of a published trial of 126 herniated disc patients randomized to surgical or nonsurgical treatment. Quality of life values were based on a study of 83 subjects with low back pain. Treatment costs for herniated discs were estimated from insurance data for 372 patients treated surgically and 1803 treated medically. Methods. Efficacy results were weighted by quality of life values to estimate the quality-adjusted benefit of surgery. Cost- effectiveness was calculated in dollars per quality-adjusted year of life gained. Supplemental data sources for cost and effectiveness provided ranges for sensitivity analyses. Results. Surgery increased average quality-adjusted life expectancy by 0.43 years during the decade following treatment, a benefit similar to extending a healthy life by 5 months. Reimbursements for surgical patients were $12,550 more than for medical patients. Nondiscounted and 5% discounted cost-effectiveness were $29,200 and $33,900 per quality- adjusted year of life gained. Supplemental analyses confirmed the base-case effectiveness estimates but suggested that the cost of discectomy was overestimated. Replacing the main cost estimate with one based on HMO patients lowered discectomy's cost to $12,000 per quality-adjusted lifeyear gained. Conclusion. For carefully selected patients with herniated discs, surgical discectomy is a cost-effective treatment. Discectomy's favorable cost-effectiveness results from its substantial effect on quality of life and moderate costs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1048-1055
Number of pages8
JournalSpine
Volume21
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Diskectomy
Intervertebral Disc Displacement
Intervertebral Disc
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Costs and Cost Analysis
Quality of Life
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Therapeutics
Health Care Costs
Health Maintenance Organizations
Information Storage and Retrieval
Low Back Pain
Life Expectancy
Insurance
Pain

Keywords

  • cost benefit analysis
  • cost of illness
  • decision support techniques
  • intervertebral disc displacement
  • low back
  • lumbar vertebrae
  • pain
  • quality of life

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Cost-effectiveness of lumbar discectomy for the treatment of herniated intervertebral disc. / Malter, A. D.; Larson, E. B.; Urban, N.; Deyo, Richard (Rick); Clark, R. E.

In: Spine, Vol. 21, No. 9, 1996, p. 1048-1055.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Malter, A. D. ; Larson, E. B. ; Urban, N. ; Deyo, Richard (Rick) ; Clark, R. E. / Cost-effectiveness of lumbar discectomy for the treatment of herniated intervertebral disc. In: Spine. 1996 ; Vol. 21, No. 9. pp. 1048-1055.
@article{376035c9b0e2436c84f557f5fadd18f8,
title = "Cost-effectiveness of lumbar discectomy for the treatment of herniated intervertebral disc",
abstract = "Study Design. A cost-effectiveness analysis of lumbar discectomy based on existing efficacy data and newly gathered cost data. Objectives. For patients with herniated lumbar discs unresponsive to conservative management, surgery relieves pain more rapidly but at higher costs than continued medical therapy. We evaluated the coat-effectiveness of lumbar discectomy for these patients. Summary of Background Data. Effectiveness estimates were based on the results of a published trial of 126 herniated disc patients randomized to surgical or nonsurgical treatment. Quality of life values were based on a study of 83 subjects with low back pain. Treatment costs for herniated discs were estimated from insurance data for 372 patients treated surgically and 1803 treated medically. Methods. Efficacy results were weighted by quality of life values to estimate the quality-adjusted benefit of surgery. Cost- effectiveness was calculated in dollars per quality-adjusted year of life gained. Supplemental data sources for cost and effectiveness provided ranges for sensitivity analyses. Results. Surgery increased average quality-adjusted life expectancy by 0.43 years during the decade following treatment, a benefit similar to extending a healthy life by 5 months. Reimbursements for surgical patients were $12,550 more than for medical patients. Nondiscounted and 5{\%} discounted cost-effectiveness were $29,200 and $33,900 per quality- adjusted year of life gained. Supplemental analyses confirmed the base-case effectiveness estimates but suggested that the cost of discectomy was overestimated. Replacing the main cost estimate with one based on HMO patients lowered discectomy's cost to $12,000 per quality-adjusted lifeyear gained. Conclusion. For carefully selected patients with herniated discs, surgical discectomy is a cost-effective treatment. Discectomy's favorable cost-effectiveness results from its substantial effect on quality of life and moderate costs.",
keywords = "cost benefit analysis, cost of illness, decision support techniques, intervertebral disc displacement, low back, lumbar vertebrae, pain, quality of life",
author = "Malter, {A. D.} and Larson, {E. B.} and N. Urban and Deyo, {Richard (Rick)} and Clark, {R. E.}",
year = "1996",
doi = "10.1097/00007632-199605010-00011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "1048--1055",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cost-effectiveness of lumbar discectomy for the treatment of herniated intervertebral disc

AU - Malter, A. D.

AU - Larson, E. B.

AU - Urban, N.

AU - Deyo, Richard (Rick)

AU - Clark, R. E.

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - Study Design. A cost-effectiveness analysis of lumbar discectomy based on existing efficacy data and newly gathered cost data. Objectives. For patients with herniated lumbar discs unresponsive to conservative management, surgery relieves pain more rapidly but at higher costs than continued medical therapy. We evaluated the coat-effectiveness of lumbar discectomy for these patients. Summary of Background Data. Effectiveness estimates were based on the results of a published trial of 126 herniated disc patients randomized to surgical or nonsurgical treatment. Quality of life values were based on a study of 83 subjects with low back pain. Treatment costs for herniated discs were estimated from insurance data for 372 patients treated surgically and 1803 treated medically. Methods. Efficacy results were weighted by quality of life values to estimate the quality-adjusted benefit of surgery. Cost- effectiveness was calculated in dollars per quality-adjusted year of life gained. Supplemental data sources for cost and effectiveness provided ranges for sensitivity analyses. Results. Surgery increased average quality-adjusted life expectancy by 0.43 years during the decade following treatment, a benefit similar to extending a healthy life by 5 months. Reimbursements for surgical patients were $12,550 more than for medical patients. Nondiscounted and 5% discounted cost-effectiveness were $29,200 and $33,900 per quality- adjusted year of life gained. Supplemental analyses confirmed the base-case effectiveness estimates but suggested that the cost of discectomy was overestimated. Replacing the main cost estimate with one based on HMO patients lowered discectomy's cost to $12,000 per quality-adjusted lifeyear gained. Conclusion. For carefully selected patients with herniated discs, surgical discectomy is a cost-effective treatment. Discectomy's favorable cost-effectiveness results from its substantial effect on quality of life and moderate costs.

AB - Study Design. A cost-effectiveness analysis of lumbar discectomy based on existing efficacy data and newly gathered cost data. Objectives. For patients with herniated lumbar discs unresponsive to conservative management, surgery relieves pain more rapidly but at higher costs than continued medical therapy. We evaluated the coat-effectiveness of lumbar discectomy for these patients. Summary of Background Data. Effectiveness estimates were based on the results of a published trial of 126 herniated disc patients randomized to surgical or nonsurgical treatment. Quality of life values were based on a study of 83 subjects with low back pain. Treatment costs for herniated discs were estimated from insurance data for 372 patients treated surgically and 1803 treated medically. Methods. Efficacy results were weighted by quality of life values to estimate the quality-adjusted benefit of surgery. Cost- effectiveness was calculated in dollars per quality-adjusted year of life gained. Supplemental data sources for cost and effectiveness provided ranges for sensitivity analyses. Results. Surgery increased average quality-adjusted life expectancy by 0.43 years during the decade following treatment, a benefit similar to extending a healthy life by 5 months. Reimbursements for surgical patients were $12,550 more than for medical patients. Nondiscounted and 5% discounted cost-effectiveness were $29,200 and $33,900 per quality- adjusted year of life gained. Supplemental analyses confirmed the base-case effectiveness estimates but suggested that the cost of discectomy was overestimated. Replacing the main cost estimate with one based on HMO patients lowered discectomy's cost to $12,000 per quality-adjusted lifeyear gained. Conclusion. For carefully selected patients with herniated discs, surgical discectomy is a cost-effective treatment. Discectomy's favorable cost-effectiveness results from its substantial effect on quality of life and moderate costs.

KW - cost benefit analysis

KW - cost of illness

KW - decision support techniques

KW - intervertebral disc displacement

KW - low back

KW - lumbar vertebrae

KW - pain

KW - quality of life

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029919304&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029919304&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00007632-199605010-00011

DO - 10.1097/00007632-199605010-00011

M3 - Article

C2 - 8724089

AN - SCOPUS:0029919304

VL - 21

SP - 1048

EP - 1055

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 9

ER -