Cost-effectiveness of elective induction of labor at 41 weeks in nulliparous women

Anjali J. Kaimal, Sarah E. Little, Anthony O. Odibo, David M. Stamilio, William A. Grobman, Elisa F. Long, Douglas K. Owens, Aaron Caughey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To investigate the cost-effectiveness of elective induction of labor at 41 weeks in nulliparous women. Study Design A decision analytic model comparing induction of labor at 41 weeks vs expectant management with antenatal testing until 42 weeks in nulliparas was designed. Baseline assumptions were derived from the literature as well as from analysis of the National Birth Cohort dataset and included an intrauterine fetal demise rate of 0.12% in the 41st week and a cesarean rate of 27% in women induced at 41 weeks. One-way and multiway sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine the robustness of the findings. Results Compared with expectant management, induction of labor is cost-effective with an incremental cost of $10,945 per quality-adjusted life year gained. Induction of labor at 41 weeks also resulted in a lower rate of adverse obstetric outcomes, including neonatal demise, shoulder dystocia, meconium aspiration syndrome, and severe perineal lacerations. Conclusion Elective induction of labor at 41 weeks is cost-effective and improves outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume204
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2011

Fingerprint

Induced Labor
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Costs and Cost Analysis
Meconium Aspiration Syndrome
Dystocia
Fetal Death
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Lacerations
Obstetrics
Parturition

Keywords

  • elective induction
  • induction of labor
  • postterm pregnancy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Cost-effectiveness of elective induction of labor at 41 weeks in nulliparous women. / Kaimal, Anjali J.; Little, Sarah E.; Odibo, Anthony O.; Stamilio, David M.; Grobman, William A.; Long, Elisa F.; Owens, Douglas K.; Caughey, Aaron.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 204, No. 2, 02.2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kaimal, Anjali J. ; Little, Sarah E. ; Odibo, Anthony O. ; Stamilio, David M. ; Grobman, William A. ; Long, Elisa F. ; Owens, Douglas K. ; Caughey, Aaron. / Cost-effectiveness of elective induction of labor at 41 weeks in nulliparous women. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2011 ; Vol. 204, No. 2.
@article{d84607e6e1fe4790bd7b5e0deea0f7e3,
title = "Cost-effectiveness of elective induction of labor at 41 weeks in nulliparous women",
abstract = "Objective To investigate the cost-effectiveness of elective induction of labor at 41 weeks in nulliparous women. Study Design A decision analytic model comparing induction of labor at 41 weeks vs expectant management with antenatal testing until 42 weeks in nulliparas was designed. Baseline assumptions were derived from the literature as well as from analysis of the National Birth Cohort dataset and included an intrauterine fetal demise rate of 0.12{\%} in the 41st week and a cesarean rate of 27{\%} in women induced at 41 weeks. One-way and multiway sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine the robustness of the findings. Results Compared with expectant management, induction of labor is cost-effective with an incremental cost of $10,945 per quality-adjusted life year gained. Induction of labor at 41 weeks also resulted in a lower rate of adverse obstetric outcomes, including neonatal demise, shoulder dystocia, meconium aspiration syndrome, and severe perineal lacerations. Conclusion Elective induction of labor at 41 weeks is cost-effective and improves outcomes.",
keywords = "elective induction, induction of labor, postterm pregnancy",
author = "Kaimal, {Anjali J.} and Little, {Sarah E.} and Odibo, {Anthony O.} and Stamilio, {David M.} and Grobman, {William A.} and Long, {Elisa F.} and Owens, {Douglas K.} and Aaron Caughey",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "204",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cost-effectiveness of elective induction of labor at 41 weeks in nulliparous women

AU - Kaimal, Anjali J.

AU - Little, Sarah E.

AU - Odibo, Anthony O.

AU - Stamilio, David M.

AU - Grobman, William A.

AU - Long, Elisa F.

AU - Owens, Douglas K.

AU - Caughey, Aaron

PY - 2011/2

Y1 - 2011/2

N2 - Objective To investigate the cost-effectiveness of elective induction of labor at 41 weeks in nulliparous women. Study Design A decision analytic model comparing induction of labor at 41 weeks vs expectant management with antenatal testing until 42 weeks in nulliparas was designed. Baseline assumptions were derived from the literature as well as from analysis of the National Birth Cohort dataset and included an intrauterine fetal demise rate of 0.12% in the 41st week and a cesarean rate of 27% in women induced at 41 weeks. One-way and multiway sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine the robustness of the findings. Results Compared with expectant management, induction of labor is cost-effective with an incremental cost of $10,945 per quality-adjusted life year gained. Induction of labor at 41 weeks also resulted in a lower rate of adverse obstetric outcomes, including neonatal demise, shoulder dystocia, meconium aspiration syndrome, and severe perineal lacerations. Conclusion Elective induction of labor at 41 weeks is cost-effective and improves outcomes.

AB - Objective To investigate the cost-effectiveness of elective induction of labor at 41 weeks in nulliparous women. Study Design A decision analytic model comparing induction of labor at 41 weeks vs expectant management with antenatal testing until 42 weeks in nulliparas was designed. Baseline assumptions were derived from the literature as well as from analysis of the National Birth Cohort dataset and included an intrauterine fetal demise rate of 0.12% in the 41st week and a cesarean rate of 27% in women induced at 41 weeks. One-way and multiway sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine the robustness of the findings. Results Compared with expectant management, induction of labor is cost-effective with an incremental cost of $10,945 per quality-adjusted life year gained. Induction of labor at 41 weeks also resulted in a lower rate of adverse obstetric outcomes, including neonatal demise, shoulder dystocia, meconium aspiration syndrome, and severe perineal lacerations. Conclusion Elective induction of labor at 41 weeks is cost-effective and improves outcomes.

KW - elective induction

KW - induction of labor

KW - postterm pregnancy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79551471969&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79551471969&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.012

DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.012

M3 - Article

C2 - 20965482

AN - SCOPUS:79551471969

VL - 204

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 2

ER -