Cost-effectiveness analyses and their role in improving healthcare strategies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this era of healthcare reform, attention is focused on increasing the quality of care and access to services, while simultaneously reducing the cost. Economic evaluations can play an important role in translating research to evidence-based practice and policy. RECENT FINDINGS: Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and its utility for clinical and policy decision making among U.S. obstetricians and gynecologists is reviewed. Three case examples demonstrating the value of this methodology in decision making are considered. A discussion of the methodologic principles of CEA, the advantages, and the limitations of the methodology are presented. SUMMARY: CEA can play an important role in evidence-based decision making, with value for clinicians and policy makers alike. These studies are of particular interest in the field of obstetrics and gynecology, in which uncertainty from epidemiologic or clinical trials exists, or multiple perspectives need to be considered (maternal, neonatal, and societal). As with all research, it is essential that economic evaluations are conducted according to established methodologic standards. Interpretation and application of results should occur with a clear understanding of both the value and the limitations of economic evaluations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)487-493
Number of pages7
JournalCurrent Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume25
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2013

Fingerprint

Cost-Benefit Analysis
Delivery of Health Care
Decision Making
Health Care Reform
Quality of Health Care
Policy Making
Evidence-Based Practice
Administrative Personnel
Gynecology
Research
Obstetrics
Uncertainty
Mothers
Clinical Trials
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • cost-effectiveness analysis
  • costbenefit analysis
  • decision analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

@article{9124b4d5e8df48428a576ee79b9fa7c1,
title = "Cost-effectiveness analyses and their role in improving healthcare strategies",
abstract = "PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this era of healthcare reform, attention is focused on increasing the quality of care and access to services, while simultaneously reducing the cost. Economic evaluations can play an important role in translating research to evidence-based practice and policy. RECENT FINDINGS: Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and its utility for clinical and policy decision making among U.S. obstetricians and gynecologists is reviewed. Three case examples demonstrating the value of this methodology in decision making are considered. A discussion of the methodologic principles of CEA, the advantages, and the limitations of the methodology are presented. SUMMARY: CEA can play an important role in evidence-based decision making, with value for clinicians and policy makers alike. These studies are of particular interest in the field of obstetrics and gynecology, in which uncertainty from epidemiologic or clinical trials exists, or multiple perspectives need to be considered (maternal, neonatal, and societal). As with all research, it is essential that economic evaluations are conducted according to established methodologic standards. Interpretation and application of results should occur with a clear understanding of both the value and the limitations of economic evaluations.",
keywords = "cost-effectiveness analysis, costbenefit analysis, decision analysis",
author = "Maria Rodriguez and Aaron Caughey",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1097/GCO.0000000000000020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "487--493",
journal = "Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "1040-872X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cost-effectiveness analyses and their role in improving healthcare strategies

AU - Rodriguez, Maria

AU - Caughey, Aaron

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this era of healthcare reform, attention is focused on increasing the quality of care and access to services, while simultaneously reducing the cost. Economic evaluations can play an important role in translating research to evidence-based practice and policy. RECENT FINDINGS: Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and its utility for clinical and policy decision making among U.S. obstetricians and gynecologists is reviewed. Three case examples demonstrating the value of this methodology in decision making are considered. A discussion of the methodologic principles of CEA, the advantages, and the limitations of the methodology are presented. SUMMARY: CEA can play an important role in evidence-based decision making, with value for clinicians and policy makers alike. These studies are of particular interest in the field of obstetrics and gynecology, in which uncertainty from epidemiologic or clinical trials exists, or multiple perspectives need to be considered (maternal, neonatal, and societal). As with all research, it is essential that economic evaluations are conducted according to established methodologic standards. Interpretation and application of results should occur with a clear understanding of both the value and the limitations of economic evaluations.

AB - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this era of healthcare reform, attention is focused on increasing the quality of care and access to services, while simultaneously reducing the cost. Economic evaluations can play an important role in translating research to evidence-based practice and policy. RECENT FINDINGS: Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and its utility for clinical and policy decision making among U.S. obstetricians and gynecologists is reviewed. Three case examples demonstrating the value of this methodology in decision making are considered. A discussion of the methodologic principles of CEA, the advantages, and the limitations of the methodology are presented. SUMMARY: CEA can play an important role in evidence-based decision making, with value for clinicians and policy makers alike. These studies are of particular interest in the field of obstetrics and gynecology, in which uncertainty from epidemiologic or clinical trials exists, or multiple perspectives need to be considered (maternal, neonatal, and societal). As with all research, it is essential that economic evaluations are conducted according to established methodologic standards. Interpretation and application of results should occur with a clear understanding of both the value and the limitations of economic evaluations.

KW - cost-effectiveness analysis

KW - costbenefit analysis

KW - decision analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888135049&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84888135049&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000020

DO - 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000020

M3 - Article

C2 - 24126787

AN - SCOPUS:84888135049

VL - 25

SP - 487

EP - 493

JO - Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 1040-872X

IS - 6

ER -