Cost-benefit of reflectance confocal microscopy in the diagnostic performance of melanoma

G. Pellacani, A. Witkowski, A. M. Cesinaro, A. Losi, G. L. Colombo, A. Campagna, C. Longo, S. Piana, N. De Carvalho, F. Giusti, F. Farnetani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

41 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background The sub-optimal diagnostic accuracy for melanoma leads to excise a high number of benign lesions, with consequent costs. Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) improves diagnostic specificity, thus possibly inducing a reduction in unnecessary excisions and related costs. Objective To estimate the influence of RCM on number of benign lesions needed to excise (NNE) a melanoma, in term of clinical outcomes and costs per patient. Patients and Methods Skin neoplasms excised by the dermatology public service in the Province of Modena were retrieved form centralized pathology database. Differences in NNE between the territorial service (using dermoscopy only) and the University Hospital (adding also RCM to the patients' workflow) were calculated and cost analysis was performed through a micro-costing approach. Results A large reduction in benign lesions excised at University Hospital was evident, leading to NNE of 6.25 for University Hospital, compared to 19.41 for Territorial Dermatology. Since 4320 unnecessary excisions can be saved every million inhabitants, an overall yearly saving of over 280,000 Eur can be expected from the use of RCM. Conclusions The systematic use of RCM was dramatically affecting the number of benign lesions excised, and this can be translated in a significant cost-benefit advantage.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)413-419
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Volume30
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology
  • Infectious Diseases

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cost-benefit of reflectance confocal microscopy in the diagnostic performance of melanoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this