Cosmetic treatment, autonomy, and risks

"if you don't do it, I'll go to a dentist who will".

G. T. Chiodo, Susan Tolle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Patient requests and treatment goals may exceed the limits of professional practice and may have an adverse effect on health. When doctors encounter these types of requests, they first must decide whether the patient has the capacity to consent to such care. In the case of child patients, no such capacity exists and surrogate consent to care must be, in the opinion of the doctor, in the child's best interests. Parents who request potentially harmful procedures for a child with no hope for any health care benefit should be refused politely. Adult patients who request harmful elective procedures for themselves also should be educated and helped to fully understand why the request represents substandard treatment. The long-term consequences of these requests must be detailed clearly for these patients. Elective cosmetic treatment that will lead to long-term adverse effects on function and health raises serious ethical concerns in which the principle of nonmaleficence likely will trump the patient's autonomy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)16-18, 20, 22 passim
JournalGeneral Dentistry
Volume49
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2001

Fingerprint

Dentists
Cosmetics
Hope
Therapeutics
Beneficence
Professional Practice
Health
Insurance Benefits
Parents
Delivery of Health Care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Cosmetic treatment, autonomy, and risks : "if you don't do it, I'll go to a dentist who will". / Chiodo, G. T.; Tolle, Susan.

In: General Dentistry, Vol. 49, No. 1, 01.2001, p. 16-18, 20, 22 passim.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0a113cf578f84926823609a9221f0736,
title = "Cosmetic treatment, autonomy, and risks: {"}if you don't do it, I'll go to a dentist who will{"}.",
abstract = "Patient requests and treatment goals may exceed the limits of professional practice and may have an adverse effect on health. When doctors encounter these types of requests, they first must decide whether the patient has the capacity to consent to such care. In the case of child patients, no such capacity exists and surrogate consent to care must be, in the opinion of the doctor, in the child's best interests. Parents who request potentially harmful procedures for a child with no hope for any health care benefit should be refused politely. Adult patients who request harmful elective procedures for themselves also should be educated and helped to fully understand why the request represents substandard treatment. The long-term consequences of these requests must be detailed clearly for these patients. Elective cosmetic treatment that will lead to long-term adverse effects on function and health raises serious ethical concerns in which the principle of nonmaleficence likely will trump the patient's autonomy.",
author = "Chiodo, {G. T.} and Susan Tolle",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "16--18, 20, 22 passim",
journal = "General Dentistry",
issn = "0363-6771",
publisher = "Academy of General Dentistry",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cosmetic treatment, autonomy, and risks

T2 - "if you don't do it, I'll go to a dentist who will".

AU - Chiodo, G. T.

AU - Tolle, Susan

PY - 2001/1

Y1 - 2001/1

N2 - Patient requests and treatment goals may exceed the limits of professional practice and may have an adverse effect on health. When doctors encounter these types of requests, they first must decide whether the patient has the capacity to consent to such care. In the case of child patients, no such capacity exists and surrogate consent to care must be, in the opinion of the doctor, in the child's best interests. Parents who request potentially harmful procedures for a child with no hope for any health care benefit should be refused politely. Adult patients who request harmful elective procedures for themselves also should be educated and helped to fully understand why the request represents substandard treatment. The long-term consequences of these requests must be detailed clearly for these patients. Elective cosmetic treatment that will lead to long-term adverse effects on function and health raises serious ethical concerns in which the principle of nonmaleficence likely will trump the patient's autonomy.

AB - Patient requests and treatment goals may exceed the limits of professional practice and may have an adverse effect on health. When doctors encounter these types of requests, they first must decide whether the patient has the capacity to consent to such care. In the case of child patients, no such capacity exists and surrogate consent to care must be, in the opinion of the doctor, in the child's best interests. Parents who request potentially harmful procedures for a child with no hope for any health care benefit should be refused politely. Adult patients who request harmful elective procedures for themselves also should be educated and helped to fully understand why the request represents substandard treatment. The long-term consequences of these requests must be detailed clearly for these patients. Elective cosmetic treatment that will lead to long-term adverse effects on function and health raises serious ethical concerns in which the principle of nonmaleficence likely will trump the patient's autonomy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17544401886&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=17544401886&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 16-18, 20, 22 passim

JO - General Dentistry

JF - General Dentistry

SN - 0363-6771

IS - 1

ER -