Coronary calcium quantification using various calibration phantoms and scoring thresholds

Maros Ferencik, Ashley Ferullo, Stephan Achenbach, Suhny Abbara, Raymond C. Chan, Sarah L. Booth, Thomas J. Brady, Udo Hoffmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rationale and Objectives: To compare scoring threshold and calibration method-dependent accuracy and variability of coronary calcium measurements by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). Methods: Ninety-five subjects were scanned with MDCT. We calculated Agatston score and volume score. Mineral mass (MM) was calculated using patient-based and scanner-based calibration methods. Accuracy of calibration was validated using artificial calcium cylinders. Results: Patient-based and scanner-based calibration permitted accurate quantification of artificial calcium cylinders (bias: 0 mg and -2 mg). In the subjects, the mean relative difference of MM measurements performed at 90 and 130 Hounsfield units threshold (59%) was lower than for Agatston score (94%) and volume score (109%; P <0.05). Patient-based and scanner-based calibration yielded systematically different MM measurements (bias: 22%). Conclusions: MM lowers threshold-dependent variability of coronary calcium measurements. Patient-based and scanner-based calibration allows accurate calcium quantification ex vivo but reveal systematic differences in subjects. Patient-based calibration may better account for subject size and composition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)559-566
Number of pages8
JournalInvestigative Radiology
Volume38
Issue number9
StatePublished - Sep 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Calibration
Calcium
Minerals
Multidetector Computed Tomography

Keywords

  • Calibration phantoms
  • Coronary calcium
  • Multidetector computed tomography
  • Quantification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Ferencik, M., Ferullo, A., Achenbach, S., Abbara, S., Chan, R. C., Booth, S. L., ... Hoffmann, U. (2003). Coronary calcium quantification using various calibration phantoms and scoring thresholds. Investigative Radiology, 38(9), 559-566.

Coronary calcium quantification using various calibration phantoms and scoring thresholds. / Ferencik, Maros; Ferullo, Ashley; Achenbach, Stephan; Abbara, Suhny; Chan, Raymond C.; Booth, Sarah L.; Brady, Thomas J.; Hoffmann, Udo.

In: Investigative Radiology, Vol. 38, No. 9, 01.09.2003, p. 559-566.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ferencik, M, Ferullo, A, Achenbach, S, Abbara, S, Chan, RC, Booth, SL, Brady, TJ & Hoffmann, U 2003, 'Coronary calcium quantification using various calibration phantoms and scoring thresholds', Investigative Radiology, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 559-566.
Ferencik M, Ferullo A, Achenbach S, Abbara S, Chan RC, Booth SL et al. Coronary calcium quantification using various calibration phantoms and scoring thresholds. Investigative Radiology. 2003 Sep 1;38(9):559-566.
Ferencik, Maros ; Ferullo, Ashley ; Achenbach, Stephan ; Abbara, Suhny ; Chan, Raymond C. ; Booth, Sarah L. ; Brady, Thomas J. ; Hoffmann, Udo. / Coronary calcium quantification using various calibration phantoms and scoring thresholds. In: Investigative Radiology. 2003 ; Vol. 38, No. 9. pp. 559-566.
@article{e5c4f1c6c0dc4490a350d0a6290466a4,
title = "Coronary calcium quantification using various calibration phantoms and scoring thresholds",
abstract = "Rationale and Objectives: To compare scoring threshold and calibration method-dependent accuracy and variability of coronary calcium measurements by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). Methods: Ninety-five subjects were scanned with MDCT. We calculated Agatston score and volume score. Mineral mass (MM) was calculated using patient-based and scanner-based calibration methods. Accuracy of calibration was validated using artificial calcium cylinders. Results: Patient-based and scanner-based calibration permitted accurate quantification of artificial calcium cylinders (bias: 0 mg and -2 mg). In the subjects, the mean relative difference of MM measurements performed at 90 and 130 Hounsfield units threshold (59{\%}) was lower than for Agatston score (94{\%}) and volume score (109{\%}; P <0.05). Patient-based and scanner-based calibration yielded systematically different MM measurements (bias: 22{\%}). Conclusions: MM lowers threshold-dependent variability of coronary calcium measurements. Patient-based and scanner-based calibration allows accurate calcium quantification ex vivo but reveal systematic differences in subjects. Patient-based calibration may better account for subject size and composition.",
keywords = "Calibration phantoms, Coronary calcium, Multidetector computed tomography, Quantification",
author = "Maros Ferencik and Ashley Ferullo and Stephan Achenbach and Suhny Abbara and Chan, {Raymond C.} and Booth, {Sarah L.} and Brady, {Thomas J.} and Udo Hoffmann",
year = "2003",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "559--566",
journal = "Investigative Radiology",
issn = "0020-9996",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Coronary calcium quantification using various calibration phantoms and scoring thresholds

AU - Ferencik, Maros

AU - Ferullo, Ashley

AU - Achenbach, Stephan

AU - Abbara, Suhny

AU - Chan, Raymond C.

AU - Booth, Sarah L.

AU - Brady, Thomas J.

AU - Hoffmann, Udo

PY - 2003/9/1

Y1 - 2003/9/1

N2 - Rationale and Objectives: To compare scoring threshold and calibration method-dependent accuracy and variability of coronary calcium measurements by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). Methods: Ninety-five subjects were scanned with MDCT. We calculated Agatston score and volume score. Mineral mass (MM) was calculated using patient-based and scanner-based calibration methods. Accuracy of calibration was validated using artificial calcium cylinders. Results: Patient-based and scanner-based calibration permitted accurate quantification of artificial calcium cylinders (bias: 0 mg and -2 mg). In the subjects, the mean relative difference of MM measurements performed at 90 and 130 Hounsfield units threshold (59%) was lower than for Agatston score (94%) and volume score (109%; P <0.05). Patient-based and scanner-based calibration yielded systematically different MM measurements (bias: 22%). Conclusions: MM lowers threshold-dependent variability of coronary calcium measurements. Patient-based and scanner-based calibration allows accurate calcium quantification ex vivo but reveal systematic differences in subjects. Patient-based calibration may better account for subject size and composition.

AB - Rationale and Objectives: To compare scoring threshold and calibration method-dependent accuracy and variability of coronary calcium measurements by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). Methods: Ninety-five subjects were scanned with MDCT. We calculated Agatston score and volume score. Mineral mass (MM) was calculated using patient-based and scanner-based calibration methods. Accuracy of calibration was validated using artificial calcium cylinders. Results: Patient-based and scanner-based calibration permitted accurate quantification of artificial calcium cylinders (bias: 0 mg and -2 mg). In the subjects, the mean relative difference of MM measurements performed at 90 and 130 Hounsfield units threshold (59%) was lower than for Agatston score (94%) and volume score (109%; P <0.05). Patient-based and scanner-based calibration yielded systematically different MM measurements (bias: 22%). Conclusions: MM lowers threshold-dependent variability of coronary calcium measurements. Patient-based and scanner-based calibration allows accurate calcium quantification ex vivo but reveal systematic differences in subjects. Patient-based calibration may better account for subject size and composition.

KW - Calibration phantoms

KW - Coronary calcium

KW - Multidetector computed tomography

KW - Quantification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0042829386&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0042829386&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 559

EP - 566

JO - Investigative Radiology

JF - Investigative Radiology

SN - 0020-9996

IS - 9

ER -