Coronal computed tomography analysis of frontal cells

Tanya K. Meyer, Mehmet Kocak, Michelle M. Smith, Timothy Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Described by Schaefer in 1916, frontal cells have been implicated as a cause of frontal recess obstruction. In this cross-sectional study, we determine the prevalence of frontal cells and other anatomic variants and examine their relationships. Methods: Coronal computed tomography scans of the sinuses performed from January 2000 to June 2001 were evaluated for frontal cells, other anatomic variants, and sinus disease. Of 1009 scans evaluated, 768 scans were included for data collection. Frontal cells were classified. Results: In this population, 20.4% of individuals had frontal cells (14.9% had type I, 3.1% had type II, 1.7% had type III, and 2.1% had type IV). The presence of frontal cells was positively associated with hyperpneumatization of the frontal sinus (p = 0.01) and negatively associated with hypopneumatization of the frontal sinus (p <0.01). Individuals with frontal cells had an increased prevalence of concha bullosa compared with individuals without frontal cells (41.4% versus 24.1%, p <0.01). The prevalence of frontal mucosal thickening was increased in individuals with type III and type IV cells compared with individuals without frontal cells (38.5 and 69.0% versus 17.1%, p = 0.04 and p <0.01). Conclusion: The prevalence of frontal cells among a population undergoing sinus computed tomography is 20.4%. Frontal cells are associated with other variants of sinonasal pneumatization and should be suspected when these variants are noted. The presence of frontal cells does not invariably lead to frontal sinusitis but may contribute to the mechanical obstruction of the frontal recess and should be appropriately addressed during the surgical management of frontal sinusitis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)163-168
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Rhinology
Volume17
Issue number3
StatePublished - May 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tomography
Frontal Sinusitis
Frontal Sinus
Population
Cross-Sectional Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Meyer, T. K., Kocak, M., Smith, M. M., & Smith, T. (2003). Coronal computed tomography analysis of frontal cells. American Journal of Rhinology, 17(3), 163-168.

Coronal computed tomography analysis of frontal cells. / Meyer, Tanya K.; Kocak, Mehmet; Smith, Michelle M.; Smith, Timothy.

In: American Journal of Rhinology, Vol. 17, No. 3, 05.2003, p. 163-168.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Meyer, TK, Kocak, M, Smith, MM & Smith, T 2003, 'Coronal computed tomography analysis of frontal cells', American Journal of Rhinology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 163-168.
Meyer, Tanya K. ; Kocak, Mehmet ; Smith, Michelle M. ; Smith, Timothy. / Coronal computed tomography analysis of frontal cells. In: American Journal of Rhinology. 2003 ; Vol. 17, No. 3. pp. 163-168.
@article{d1fe91627ec64e39abd6dca92e949c6c,
title = "Coronal computed tomography analysis of frontal cells",
abstract = "Background: Described by Schaefer in 1916, frontal cells have been implicated as a cause of frontal recess obstruction. In this cross-sectional study, we determine the prevalence of frontal cells and other anatomic variants and examine their relationships. Methods: Coronal computed tomography scans of the sinuses performed from January 2000 to June 2001 were evaluated for frontal cells, other anatomic variants, and sinus disease. Of 1009 scans evaluated, 768 scans were included for data collection. Frontal cells were classified. Results: In this population, 20.4{\%} of individuals had frontal cells (14.9{\%} had type I, 3.1{\%} had type II, 1.7{\%} had type III, and 2.1{\%} had type IV). The presence of frontal cells was positively associated with hyperpneumatization of the frontal sinus (p = 0.01) and negatively associated with hypopneumatization of the frontal sinus (p <0.01). Individuals with frontal cells had an increased prevalence of concha bullosa compared with individuals without frontal cells (41.4{\%} versus 24.1{\%}, p <0.01). The prevalence of frontal mucosal thickening was increased in individuals with type III and type IV cells compared with individuals without frontal cells (38.5 and 69.0{\%} versus 17.1{\%}, p = 0.04 and p <0.01). Conclusion: The prevalence of frontal cells among a population undergoing sinus computed tomography is 20.4{\%}. Frontal cells are associated with other variants of sinonasal pneumatization and should be suspected when these variants are noted. The presence of frontal cells does not invariably lead to frontal sinusitis but may contribute to the mechanical obstruction of the frontal recess and should be appropriately addressed during the surgical management of frontal sinusitis.",
author = "Meyer, {Tanya K.} and Mehmet Kocak and Smith, {Michelle M.} and Timothy Smith",
year = "2003",
month = "5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "163--168",
journal = "American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy",
issn = "1945-8924",
publisher = "OceanSide Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Coronal computed tomography analysis of frontal cells

AU - Meyer, Tanya K.

AU - Kocak, Mehmet

AU - Smith, Michelle M.

AU - Smith, Timothy

PY - 2003/5

Y1 - 2003/5

N2 - Background: Described by Schaefer in 1916, frontal cells have been implicated as a cause of frontal recess obstruction. In this cross-sectional study, we determine the prevalence of frontal cells and other anatomic variants and examine their relationships. Methods: Coronal computed tomography scans of the sinuses performed from January 2000 to June 2001 were evaluated for frontal cells, other anatomic variants, and sinus disease. Of 1009 scans evaluated, 768 scans were included for data collection. Frontal cells were classified. Results: In this population, 20.4% of individuals had frontal cells (14.9% had type I, 3.1% had type II, 1.7% had type III, and 2.1% had type IV). The presence of frontal cells was positively associated with hyperpneumatization of the frontal sinus (p = 0.01) and negatively associated with hypopneumatization of the frontal sinus (p <0.01). Individuals with frontal cells had an increased prevalence of concha bullosa compared with individuals without frontal cells (41.4% versus 24.1%, p <0.01). The prevalence of frontal mucosal thickening was increased in individuals with type III and type IV cells compared with individuals without frontal cells (38.5 and 69.0% versus 17.1%, p = 0.04 and p <0.01). Conclusion: The prevalence of frontal cells among a population undergoing sinus computed tomography is 20.4%. Frontal cells are associated with other variants of sinonasal pneumatization and should be suspected when these variants are noted. The presence of frontal cells does not invariably lead to frontal sinusitis but may contribute to the mechanical obstruction of the frontal recess and should be appropriately addressed during the surgical management of frontal sinusitis.

AB - Background: Described by Schaefer in 1916, frontal cells have been implicated as a cause of frontal recess obstruction. In this cross-sectional study, we determine the prevalence of frontal cells and other anatomic variants and examine their relationships. Methods: Coronal computed tomography scans of the sinuses performed from January 2000 to June 2001 were evaluated for frontal cells, other anatomic variants, and sinus disease. Of 1009 scans evaluated, 768 scans were included for data collection. Frontal cells were classified. Results: In this population, 20.4% of individuals had frontal cells (14.9% had type I, 3.1% had type II, 1.7% had type III, and 2.1% had type IV). The presence of frontal cells was positively associated with hyperpneumatization of the frontal sinus (p = 0.01) and negatively associated with hypopneumatization of the frontal sinus (p <0.01). Individuals with frontal cells had an increased prevalence of concha bullosa compared with individuals without frontal cells (41.4% versus 24.1%, p <0.01). The prevalence of frontal mucosal thickening was increased in individuals with type III and type IV cells compared with individuals without frontal cells (38.5 and 69.0% versus 17.1%, p = 0.04 and p <0.01). Conclusion: The prevalence of frontal cells among a population undergoing sinus computed tomography is 20.4%. Frontal cells are associated with other variants of sinonasal pneumatization and should be suspected when these variants are noted. The presence of frontal cells does not invariably lead to frontal sinusitis but may contribute to the mechanical obstruction of the frontal recess and should be appropriately addressed during the surgical management of frontal sinusitis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038454500&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038454500&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 163

EP - 168

JO - American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy

JF - American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy

SN - 1945-8924

IS - 3

ER -