Core outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials in nonspecific low back pain

Alessandro Chiarotto, Maarten Boers, Richard (Rick) Deyo, Rachelle Buchbinder, Terry P. Corbin, Leonardo O.P. Costa, Nadine E. Foster, Margreth Grotle, Bart W. Koes, Francisco M. Kovacs, C. W. Christine Lin, Chris G. Maher, Adam M. Pearson, Wilco C. Peul, Mark L. Schoene, Dennis C. Turk, Maurits W. Van Tulder, Caroline B. Terwee, Raymond W. Ostelo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To standardize outcome reporting in clinical trials of patients with nonspecific low back pain, an international multidisciplinary pane recommended physical functioning, pain intensity, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as core outcome domains. Given the lack of a consensus on measurement instruments for these 3 domains in patients with low back pain, this study aimed to generate such consensus. The measurement properties of 17 patient-reported outcome measures for physical functioning, 3 for pain intensity, and 5 for HRQoL were appraised in 3 systematic reviews following the COSMIN methodology. Researchers, clinicians, and patients (n 5 207) were invited in a 2-round Delphi survey to generate consensus ($67% agreement among participants) on which instruments to endorse. Response rates were 44% and 41%, respectively. In round 1, consensus was achieved on the Oswestry Disability Index version 2.1a for physical functioning (78% agreement) and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain intensity (75% agreement). No consensus was achieved on any HRQoL instrument, although the Short Form 12 (SF12) approached the consensus threshold (64% agreement). In round 2, a consensus was reached on an NRS version with a 1-week recall period (96% agreement) Various participants requested 1 free-to-use instrument per domain. Considering all issues together, recommendations on core instruments were formulated: Oswestry Disability Index version 2.1a or 24-item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for physica functioning, NRS for pain intensity, and SF12 or 10-item PROMIS Global Health form for HRQoL. Further studies need to fill the evidence gaps on the measurement properties of these and other instruments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)481-495
Number of pages15
JournalPain
Volume159
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018

Fingerprint

Low Back Pain
Consensus
Clinical Trials
Quality of Life
Pain
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Clinical trials
  • Core outcome set
  • Low back pain
  • Outcome measurement instruments
  • Recommendations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Chiarotto, A., Boers, M., Deyo, R. R., Buchbinder, R., Corbin, T. P., Costa, L. O. P., ... Ostelo, R. W. (2018). Core outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials in nonspecific low back pain. Pain, 159(3), 481-495. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001117

Core outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials in nonspecific low back pain. / Chiarotto, Alessandro; Boers, Maarten; Deyo, Richard (Rick); Buchbinder, Rachelle; Corbin, Terry P.; Costa, Leonardo O.P.; Foster, Nadine E.; Grotle, Margreth; Koes, Bart W.; Kovacs, Francisco M.; Christine Lin, C. W.; Maher, Chris G.; Pearson, Adam M.; Peul, Wilco C.; Schoene, Mark L.; Turk, Dennis C.; Van Tulder, Maurits W.; Terwee, Caroline B.; Ostelo, Raymond W.

In: Pain, Vol. 159, No. 3, 01.03.2018, p. 481-495.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chiarotto, A, Boers, M, Deyo, RR, Buchbinder, R, Corbin, TP, Costa, LOP, Foster, NE, Grotle, M, Koes, BW, Kovacs, FM, Christine Lin, CW, Maher, CG, Pearson, AM, Peul, WC, Schoene, ML, Turk, DC, Van Tulder, MW, Terwee, CB & Ostelo, RW 2018, 'Core outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials in nonspecific low back pain', Pain, vol. 159, no. 3, pp. 481-495. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001117
Chiarotto, Alessandro ; Boers, Maarten ; Deyo, Richard (Rick) ; Buchbinder, Rachelle ; Corbin, Terry P. ; Costa, Leonardo O.P. ; Foster, Nadine E. ; Grotle, Margreth ; Koes, Bart W. ; Kovacs, Francisco M. ; Christine Lin, C. W. ; Maher, Chris G. ; Pearson, Adam M. ; Peul, Wilco C. ; Schoene, Mark L. ; Turk, Dennis C. ; Van Tulder, Maurits W. ; Terwee, Caroline B. ; Ostelo, Raymond W. / Core outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials in nonspecific low back pain. In: Pain. 2018 ; Vol. 159, No. 3. pp. 481-495.
@article{39bc36a6fbc74b37aad4bddef7f0262f,
title = "Core outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials in nonspecific low back pain",
abstract = "To standardize outcome reporting in clinical trials of patients with nonspecific low back pain, an international multidisciplinary pane recommended physical functioning, pain intensity, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as core outcome domains. Given the lack of a consensus on measurement instruments for these 3 domains in patients with low back pain, this study aimed to generate such consensus. The measurement properties of 17 patient-reported outcome measures for physical functioning, 3 for pain intensity, and 5 for HRQoL were appraised in 3 systematic reviews following the COSMIN methodology. Researchers, clinicians, and patients (n 5 207) were invited in a 2-round Delphi survey to generate consensus ($67{\%} agreement among participants) on which instruments to endorse. Response rates were 44{\%} and 41{\%}, respectively. In round 1, consensus was achieved on the Oswestry Disability Index version 2.1a for physical functioning (78{\%} agreement) and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain intensity (75{\%} agreement). No consensus was achieved on any HRQoL instrument, although the Short Form 12 (SF12) approached the consensus threshold (64{\%} agreement). In round 2, a consensus was reached on an NRS version with a 1-week recall period (96{\%} agreement) Various participants requested 1 free-to-use instrument per domain. Considering all issues together, recommendations on core instruments were formulated: Oswestry Disability Index version 2.1a or 24-item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for physica functioning, NRS for pain intensity, and SF12 or 10-item PROMIS Global Health form for HRQoL. Further studies need to fill the evidence gaps on the measurement properties of these and other instruments.",
keywords = "Clinical trials, Core outcome set, Low back pain, Outcome measurement instruments, Recommendations",
author = "Alessandro Chiarotto and Maarten Boers and Deyo, {Richard (Rick)} and Rachelle Buchbinder and Corbin, {Terry P.} and Costa, {Leonardo O.P.} and Foster, {Nadine E.} and Margreth Grotle and Koes, {Bart W.} and Kovacs, {Francisco M.} and {Christine Lin}, {C. W.} and Maher, {Chris G.} and Pearson, {Adam M.} and Peul, {Wilco C.} and Schoene, {Mark L.} and Turk, {Dennis C.} and {Van Tulder}, {Maurits W.} and Terwee, {Caroline B.} and Ostelo, {Raymond W.}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001117",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "159",
pages = "481--495",
journal = "Pain",
issn = "0304-3959",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Core outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials in nonspecific low back pain

AU - Chiarotto, Alessandro

AU - Boers, Maarten

AU - Deyo, Richard (Rick)

AU - Buchbinder, Rachelle

AU - Corbin, Terry P.

AU - Costa, Leonardo O.P.

AU - Foster, Nadine E.

AU - Grotle, Margreth

AU - Koes, Bart W.

AU - Kovacs, Francisco M.

AU - Christine Lin, C. W.

AU - Maher, Chris G.

AU - Pearson, Adam M.

AU - Peul, Wilco C.

AU - Schoene, Mark L.

AU - Turk, Dennis C.

AU - Van Tulder, Maurits W.

AU - Terwee, Caroline B.

AU - Ostelo, Raymond W.

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - To standardize outcome reporting in clinical trials of patients with nonspecific low back pain, an international multidisciplinary pane recommended physical functioning, pain intensity, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as core outcome domains. Given the lack of a consensus on measurement instruments for these 3 domains in patients with low back pain, this study aimed to generate such consensus. The measurement properties of 17 patient-reported outcome measures for physical functioning, 3 for pain intensity, and 5 for HRQoL were appraised in 3 systematic reviews following the COSMIN methodology. Researchers, clinicians, and patients (n 5 207) were invited in a 2-round Delphi survey to generate consensus ($67% agreement among participants) on which instruments to endorse. Response rates were 44% and 41%, respectively. In round 1, consensus was achieved on the Oswestry Disability Index version 2.1a for physical functioning (78% agreement) and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain intensity (75% agreement). No consensus was achieved on any HRQoL instrument, although the Short Form 12 (SF12) approached the consensus threshold (64% agreement). In round 2, a consensus was reached on an NRS version with a 1-week recall period (96% agreement) Various participants requested 1 free-to-use instrument per domain. Considering all issues together, recommendations on core instruments were formulated: Oswestry Disability Index version 2.1a or 24-item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for physica functioning, NRS for pain intensity, and SF12 or 10-item PROMIS Global Health form for HRQoL. Further studies need to fill the evidence gaps on the measurement properties of these and other instruments.

AB - To standardize outcome reporting in clinical trials of patients with nonspecific low back pain, an international multidisciplinary pane recommended physical functioning, pain intensity, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as core outcome domains. Given the lack of a consensus on measurement instruments for these 3 domains in patients with low back pain, this study aimed to generate such consensus. The measurement properties of 17 patient-reported outcome measures for physical functioning, 3 for pain intensity, and 5 for HRQoL were appraised in 3 systematic reviews following the COSMIN methodology. Researchers, clinicians, and patients (n 5 207) were invited in a 2-round Delphi survey to generate consensus ($67% agreement among participants) on which instruments to endorse. Response rates were 44% and 41%, respectively. In round 1, consensus was achieved on the Oswestry Disability Index version 2.1a for physical functioning (78% agreement) and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain intensity (75% agreement). No consensus was achieved on any HRQoL instrument, although the Short Form 12 (SF12) approached the consensus threshold (64% agreement). In round 2, a consensus was reached on an NRS version with a 1-week recall period (96% agreement) Various participants requested 1 free-to-use instrument per domain. Considering all issues together, recommendations on core instruments were formulated: Oswestry Disability Index version 2.1a or 24-item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for physica functioning, NRS for pain intensity, and SF12 or 10-item PROMIS Global Health form for HRQoL. Further studies need to fill the evidence gaps on the measurement properties of these and other instruments.

KW - Clinical trials

KW - Core outcome set

KW - Low back pain

KW - Outcome measurement instruments

KW - Recommendations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048403026&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048403026&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001117

DO - 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001117

M3 - Article

VL - 159

SP - 481

EP - 495

JO - Pain

JF - Pain

SN - 0304-3959

IS - 3

ER -