Core Aspects of Satisfaction with Pain Management

Cancer Patients' Perspectives

Susan L. Beck, Gail L. Towsley, Patricia Berry, Karen Lindau, Rosemary B. Field, Shantelle Jensen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context: The coexistence of high levels of satisfaction and high levels of pain has been perplexing. Objectives: The aims of this study were to 1) describe patient expectations related to the experience of cancer-related pain, 2) explore the cognitive processes and meaning that underlie patient judgments about satisfaction and dissatisfaction with pain management, and 3) explore the discrepancies between ratings of high satisfaction with pain management with high pain intensity. Methods: The sample included 33 patients: 18 with advanced cancer and 15 experiencing pain after a surgery for a cancer diagnosis. All patients had experienced "worst pain" of at least moderate intensity and were interviewed using standard pain measures from the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire and open-ended questions about the underlying meaning of their answers. We systematically analyzed the transcribed qualitative data using NVivo software. Results: Fifty-five percent of patients were females and were aged 25-78 years. Most (75%) were satisfied or very satisfied with their overall pain management. Key findings indicate that for some, the worst pain rating was often brief, even momentary. Most patients expected pain relief. Four key themes were important to the quality of pain management: being treated right, having a safety net, being in a partnership with their health care team, and having pain treatment that was efficacious. Key aspects of the patient-provider relationship that mattered were how the nurses and doctors behaved toward them and how quickly they responded to reports of pain. For some, an important factor was whether they had control of the amount of pain they experienced. Conclusion: The findings inform measurement of patient satisfaction with the quality of pain management.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)100-115
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Pain and Symptom Management
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pain Management
Pain
Neoplasms
Patient Care Team
Patient Satisfaction
Software
Nurses
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Safety

Keywords

  • Cancer pain prevention and control
  • neoplasms
  • patient satisfaction evaluation
  • qualitative research
  • quality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Core Aspects of Satisfaction with Pain Management : Cancer Patients' Perspectives. / Beck, Susan L.; Towsley, Gail L.; Berry, Patricia; Lindau, Karen; Field, Rosemary B.; Jensen, Shantelle.

In: Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Vol. 39, No. 1, 01.2010, p. 100-115.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Beck, Susan L. ; Towsley, Gail L. ; Berry, Patricia ; Lindau, Karen ; Field, Rosemary B. ; Jensen, Shantelle. / Core Aspects of Satisfaction with Pain Management : Cancer Patients' Perspectives. In: Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2010 ; Vol. 39, No. 1. pp. 100-115.
@article{c71c982d2d5a43a3ba3ee74de57df940,
title = "Core Aspects of Satisfaction with Pain Management: Cancer Patients' Perspectives",
abstract = "Context: The coexistence of high levels of satisfaction and high levels of pain has been perplexing. Objectives: The aims of this study were to 1) describe patient expectations related to the experience of cancer-related pain, 2) explore the cognitive processes and meaning that underlie patient judgments about satisfaction and dissatisfaction with pain management, and 3) explore the discrepancies between ratings of high satisfaction with pain management with high pain intensity. Methods: The sample included 33 patients: 18 with advanced cancer and 15 experiencing pain after a surgery for a cancer diagnosis. All patients had experienced {"}worst pain{"} of at least moderate intensity and were interviewed using standard pain measures from the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire and open-ended questions about the underlying meaning of their answers. We systematically analyzed the transcribed qualitative data using NVivo software. Results: Fifty-five percent of patients were females and were aged 25-78 years. Most (75{\%}) were satisfied or very satisfied with their overall pain management. Key findings indicate that for some, the worst pain rating was often brief, even momentary. Most patients expected pain relief. Four key themes were important to the quality of pain management: being treated right, having a safety net, being in a partnership with their health care team, and having pain treatment that was efficacious. Key aspects of the patient-provider relationship that mattered were how the nurses and doctors behaved toward them and how quickly they responded to reports of pain. For some, an important factor was whether they had control of the amount of pain they experienced. Conclusion: The findings inform measurement of patient satisfaction with the quality of pain management.",
keywords = "Cancer pain prevention and control, neoplasms, patient satisfaction evaluation, qualitative research, quality",
author = "Beck, {Susan L.} and Towsley, {Gail L.} and Patricia Berry and Karen Lindau and Field, {Rosemary B.} and Shantelle Jensen",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.06.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "100--115",
journal = "Journal of Pain and Symptom Management",
issn = "0885-3924",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Core Aspects of Satisfaction with Pain Management

T2 - Cancer Patients' Perspectives

AU - Beck, Susan L.

AU - Towsley, Gail L.

AU - Berry, Patricia

AU - Lindau, Karen

AU - Field, Rosemary B.

AU - Jensen, Shantelle

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - Context: The coexistence of high levels of satisfaction and high levels of pain has been perplexing. Objectives: The aims of this study were to 1) describe patient expectations related to the experience of cancer-related pain, 2) explore the cognitive processes and meaning that underlie patient judgments about satisfaction and dissatisfaction with pain management, and 3) explore the discrepancies between ratings of high satisfaction with pain management with high pain intensity. Methods: The sample included 33 patients: 18 with advanced cancer and 15 experiencing pain after a surgery for a cancer diagnosis. All patients had experienced "worst pain" of at least moderate intensity and were interviewed using standard pain measures from the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire and open-ended questions about the underlying meaning of their answers. We systematically analyzed the transcribed qualitative data using NVivo software. Results: Fifty-five percent of patients were females and were aged 25-78 years. Most (75%) were satisfied or very satisfied with their overall pain management. Key findings indicate that for some, the worst pain rating was often brief, even momentary. Most patients expected pain relief. Four key themes were important to the quality of pain management: being treated right, having a safety net, being in a partnership with their health care team, and having pain treatment that was efficacious. Key aspects of the patient-provider relationship that mattered were how the nurses and doctors behaved toward them and how quickly they responded to reports of pain. For some, an important factor was whether they had control of the amount of pain they experienced. Conclusion: The findings inform measurement of patient satisfaction with the quality of pain management.

AB - Context: The coexistence of high levels of satisfaction and high levels of pain has been perplexing. Objectives: The aims of this study were to 1) describe patient expectations related to the experience of cancer-related pain, 2) explore the cognitive processes and meaning that underlie patient judgments about satisfaction and dissatisfaction with pain management, and 3) explore the discrepancies between ratings of high satisfaction with pain management with high pain intensity. Methods: The sample included 33 patients: 18 with advanced cancer and 15 experiencing pain after a surgery for a cancer diagnosis. All patients had experienced "worst pain" of at least moderate intensity and were interviewed using standard pain measures from the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire and open-ended questions about the underlying meaning of their answers. We systematically analyzed the transcribed qualitative data using NVivo software. Results: Fifty-five percent of patients were females and were aged 25-78 years. Most (75%) were satisfied or very satisfied with their overall pain management. Key findings indicate that for some, the worst pain rating was often brief, even momentary. Most patients expected pain relief. Four key themes were important to the quality of pain management: being treated right, having a safety net, being in a partnership with their health care team, and having pain treatment that was efficacious. Key aspects of the patient-provider relationship that mattered were how the nurses and doctors behaved toward them and how quickly they responded to reports of pain. For some, an important factor was whether they had control of the amount of pain they experienced. Conclusion: The findings inform measurement of patient satisfaction with the quality of pain management.

KW - Cancer pain prevention and control

KW - neoplasms

KW - patient satisfaction evaluation

KW - qualitative research

KW - quality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=73049086591&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=73049086591&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.06.009

DO - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.06.009

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 100

EP - 115

JO - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

JF - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

SN - 0885-3924

IS - 1

ER -