Controversy: Does repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation/ transcranial direct current stimulation show efficacy in treating tinnitus patients?

Berthold Langguth, Dirk de Ridder, John L. Dornhoffer, Peter Eichhammer, Robert L. Folmer, Elmar Frank, Felipe Fregni, Christian Gerloff, Eman Khedr, Tobias Kleinjung, Michael Landgrebe, Scott Lee, Jean Pascal Lefaucheur, Alain Londero, Renata Marcondes, Aage R. Moller, Alvaro Pascual-Leone, Christian Plewnia, Simone Rossi, Tanit SanchezPhilipp Sand, Winfried Schlee, Thomas Steffens, Paul van de Heyning, Goeran Hajak

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

66 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Tinnitus affects 10% of the population, its pathophysiology remains incompletely understood, and treatment is elusive. Functional imaging has demonstrated a relationship between the intensity of tinnitus and the degree of reorganization in the auditory cortex. Experimental studies have further shown that tinnitus is associated with synchronized hyperactivity in the auditory cortex. Therefore, targeted modulation of auditory cortex has been proposed as a new therapeutic approach for chronic tinnitus. Methods: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are noninvasive methods that can modulate cortical activity. These techniques have been applied in different ways in patients with chronic tinnitus. Single sessions of high-frequency rTMS over the temporal cortex have been successful in reducing the intensity of tinnitus during the time of stimulation and could be predictive for treatment outcome of chronic epidural stimulation using implanted electrodes. Results: Another approach that uses rTMS as a treatment for tinnitus is application of low-frequency rTMS in repeated sessions, to induce a lasting change of neuronal activity in the auditory cortex beyond the duration of stimulation. Beneficial effects of this treatment have been consistently demonstrated in several small controlled studies. However, results are characterized by high interindividual variability and only a moderate decrease of the tinnitus. The role of patient-related (for example, hearing loss, tinnitus duration, age) and stimulation-related (for example, stimulation site, stimulation protocols) factors still remains to be elucidated. Conclusions: Even in this early stage of investigation, there is a convincing body of evidence that rTMS represents a promising tool for pathophysiological assessment and therapeutic management of tinnitus. Further development of this technique will depend on a more detailed understanding of the neurobiological effects mediating the benefit of TMS on tinnitus perception. Moreover clinical studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)192-205
Number of pages14
JournalBrain Stimulation
Volume1
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2008
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • auditory cortex
  • functional imaging
  • neuromodulation
  • neuronavigation
  • neuroplasticity
  • tinnitus
  • transcranial direct current stimulation
  • transcranial magnetic stimulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Controversy: Does repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation/ transcranial direct current stimulation show efficacy in treating tinnitus patients?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this