Continuity of primary care: to whom does it matter and when?

Paul A. Nutting, Meredith A. Goodwin, Sue Flocke, Stephen J. Zyzanski, Kurt C. Stange

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

208 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inconsistent findings on the value of continuity of care can stem from variability in its importance to different subsets of patients. We therefore examined the association among patient and visit characteristics and extent to which the patient valued continuity of care (PVC). We hypothesized that continuity would be more important to patients who are older, sicker, and female, who have established a relationship with their physician, and whose visit addresses more complex problems. METHODS: A study of 4,454 consecutive outpatient visits to 138 community-based family physicians used a 3-item measure (alpha = 0.67) of PVC. The patient's report of (1) the adequacy of primary care for the visit and (2) satisfaction with the physician on that visit was assessed with multiple measures. Analyses examined the associations among PVC and patient-reported satisfaction with the physician and adequacy of the visit. RESULTS: Extremes of age, female sex, less education, Medicare and Medicaid insurance, number of chronic conditions and medications, number of visits to the practice, and worse self-reported health status were associated with higher value placed on continuity (P < .001 for all except sex, where P = .015). Patients who value continuity and did not see a regular physician rated adequacy of the visit lower (for 7 attributes of the visit) than those seeing their own physician. Satisfaction with the physician for the visit was greatest among patients who value continuity and saw their regular physician. CONCLUSIONS: Continuity of physician care is associated with more positive assessments of the visit and appears to be particularly important for more vulnerable patients. Health care systems and primary care practices should devote additional effort to maintaining a continuity relationship with these vulnerable patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)149-155
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of family medicine
Volume1
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Continuity of Patient Care
Primary Health Care
Physicians
Sex Education
Family Physicians
Medicaid
Medicare
Insurance
Patient Satisfaction
Health Status
Outpatients
Delivery of Health Care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Family Practice

Cite this

Nutting, P. A., Goodwin, M. A., Flocke, S., Zyzanski, S. J., & Stange, K. C. (2003). Continuity of primary care: to whom does it matter and when? Annals of family medicine, 1(3), 149-155. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.63

Continuity of primary care : to whom does it matter and when? / Nutting, Paul A.; Goodwin, Meredith A.; Flocke, Sue; Zyzanski, Stephen J.; Stange, Kurt C.

In: Annals of family medicine, Vol. 1, No. 3, 01.01.2003, p. 149-155.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nutting, PA, Goodwin, MA, Flocke, S, Zyzanski, SJ & Stange, KC 2003, 'Continuity of primary care: to whom does it matter and when?', Annals of family medicine, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 149-155. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.63
Nutting, Paul A. ; Goodwin, Meredith A. ; Flocke, Sue ; Zyzanski, Stephen J. ; Stange, Kurt C. / Continuity of primary care : to whom does it matter and when?. In: Annals of family medicine. 2003 ; Vol. 1, No. 3. pp. 149-155.
@article{4be656d78ab5424abe105b27614e411e,
title = "Continuity of primary care: to whom does it matter and when?",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Inconsistent findings on the value of continuity of care can stem from variability in its importance to different subsets of patients. We therefore examined the association among patient and visit characteristics and extent to which the patient valued continuity of care (PVC). We hypothesized that continuity would be more important to patients who are older, sicker, and female, who have established a relationship with their physician, and whose visit addresses more complex problems. METHODS: A study of 4,454 consecutive outpatient visits to 138 community-based family physicians used a 3-item measure (alpha = 0.67) of PVC. The patient's report of (1) the adequacy of primary care for the visit and (2) satisfaction with the physician on that visit was assessed with multiple measures. Analyses examined the associations among PVC and patient-reported satisfaction with the physician and adequacy of the visit. RESULTS: Extremes of age, female sex, less education, Medicare and Medicaid insurance, number of chronic conditions and medications, number of visits to the practice, and worse self-reported health status were associated with higher value placed on continuity (P < .001 for all except sex, where P = .015). Patients who value continuity and did not see a regular physician rated adequacy of the visit lower (for 7 attributes of the visit) than those seeing their own physician. Satisfaction with the physician for the visit was greatest among patients who value continuity and saw their regular physician. CONCLUSIONS: Continuity of physician care is associated with more positive assessments of the visit and appears to be particularly important for more vulnerable patients. Health care systems and primary care practices should devote additional effort to maintaining a continuity relationship with these vulnerable patients.",
author = "Nutting, {Paul A.} and Goodwin, {Meredith A.} and Sue Flocke and Zyzanski, {Stephen J.} and Stange, {Kurt C.}",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1370/afm.63",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "149--155",
journal = "Annals of Family Medicine",
issn = "1544-1709",
publisher = "Annals of Family Medicine, Inc",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Continuity of primary care

T2 - to whom does it matter and when?

AU - Nutting, Paul A.

AU - Goodwin, Meredith A.

AU - Flocke, Sue

AU - Zyzanski, Stephen J.

AU - Stange, Kurt C.

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Inconsistent findings on the value of continuity of care can stem from variability in its importance to different subsets of patients. We therefore examined the association among patient and visit characteristics and extent to which the patient valued continuity of care (PVC). We hypothesized that continuity would be more important to patients who are older, sicker, and female, who have established a relationship with their physician, and whose visit addresses more complex problems. METHODS: A study of 4,454 consecutive outpatient visits to 138 community-based family physicians used a 3-item measure (alpha = 0.67) of PVC. The patient's report of (1) the adequacy of primary care for the visit and (2) satisfaction with the physician on that visit was assessed with multiple measures. Analyses examined the associations among PVC and patient-reported satisfaction with the physician and adequacy of the visit. RESULTS: Extremes of age, female sex, less education, Medicare and Medicaid insurance, number of chronic conditions and medications, number of visits to the practice, and worse self-reported health status were associated with higher value placed on continuity (P < .001 for all except sex, where P = .015). Patients who value continuity and did not see a regular physician rated adequacy of the visit lower (for 7 attributes of the visit) than those seeing their own physician. Satisfaction with the physician for the visit was greatest among patients who value continuity and saw their regular physician. CONCLUSIONS: Continuity of physician care is associated with more positive assessments of the visit and appears to be particularly important for more vulnerable patients. Health care systems and primary care practices should devote additional effort to maintaining a continuity relationship with these vulnerable patients.

AB - BACKGROUND: Inconsistent findings on the value of continuity of care can stem from variability in its importance to different subsets of patients. We therefore examined the association among patient and visit characteristics and extent to which the patient valued continuity of care (PVC). We hypothesized that continuity would be more important to patients who are older, sicker, and female, who have established a relationship with their physician, and whose visit addresses more complex problems. METHODS: A study of 4,454 consecutive outpatient visits to 138 community-based family physicians used a 3-item measure (alpha = 0.67) of PVC. The patient's report of (1) the adequacy of primary care for the visit and (2) satisfaction with the physician on that visit was assessed with multiple measures. Analyses examined the associations among PVC and patient-reported satisfaction with the physician and adequacy of the visit. RESULTS: Extremes of age, female sex, less education, Medicare and Medicaid insurance, number of chronic conditions and medications, number of visits to the practice, and worse self-reported health status were associated with higher value placed on continuity (P < .001 for all except sex, where P = .015). Patients who value continuity and did not see a regular physician rated adequacy of the visit lower (for 7 attributes of the visit) than those seeing their own physician. Satisfaction with the physician for the visit was greatest among patients who value continuity and saw their regular physician. CONCLUSIONS: Continuity of physician care is associated with more positive assessments of the visit and appears to be particularly important for more vulnerable patients. Health care systems and primary care practices should devote additional effort to maintaining a continuity relationship with these vulnerable patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1842434244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1842434244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1370/afm.63

DO - 10.1370/afm.63

M3 - Article

C2 - 15043376

AN - SCOPUS:1842434244

VL - 1

SP - 149

EP - 155

JO - Annals of Family Medicine

JF - Annals of Family Medicine

SN - 1544-1709

IS - 3

ER -