Contextual influences on subjective and behavioral responses to alcohol

William R. Corbin, Caitlin Scott, Stephen Boyd, Kyle R. Menary, Craig K. Enders

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Differential sensitivity to alcohol effects (e.g., increased stimulation and decreased sedation) is associated with heavier use and problems. Although genetic factors contribute to alcohol response (AR), environmental factors may also play a role. This study examined effects of physical context on AR using a between subjects placebo-controlled design. There were 157 (57% male) participants (ages 21-30) who were randomized to 1 of 4 conditions based on beverage (placebo or alcohol [target BrAC = .08 g%]) and physical context (simulated bar or traditional lab). AR was assessed using the Subjective Effects of Alcohol Scale and the Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale, as well as behavioral tasks including the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) and its negative reinforcement counterpart (MRBURNS). A beverage condition by context interaction emerged for low arousal positive subjective response (SR), and among women, for performance on the BART task. In the lab context only, alcohol (relative to placebo) was associated with stronger low arousal positive SR and, for women, with impaired performance on the BART task. This suggests that a less stimulating lab context may be better suited to differentiating positive alcohol effects from expectancies, whereas a bar context may be better suited to detecting expectancy effects. The findings also suggest that the ability to better appreciate positive alcohol effects (relative to expectations) in less stimulating contexts may lead to a strengthening of these effects among individuals who drink in these environments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)59-70
Number of pages12
JournalExperimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Alcohols
Beverages
Placebos
Arousal
Aptitude

Keywords

  • BART
  • Physical context
  • Placebo control
  • Subjective effects of alcohol scale
  • Subjective response

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

Contextual influences on subjective and behavioral responses to alcohol. / Corbin, William R.; Scott, Caitlin; Boyd, Stephen; Menary, Kyle R.; Enders, Craig K.

In: Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, Vol. 23, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 59-70.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Corbin, William R. ; Scott, Caitlin ; Boyd, Stephen ; Menary, Kyle R. ; Enders, Craig K. / Contextual influences on subjective and behavioral responses to alcohol. In: Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology. 2015 ; Vol. 23, No. 1. pp. 59-70.
@article{d9b8b2a2c3644682aeb51bd6d80e4f7c,
title = "Contextual influences on subjective and behavioral responses to alcohol",
abstract = "Differential sensitivity to alcohol effects (e.g., increased stimulation and decreased sedation) is associated with heavier use and problems. Although genetic factors contribute to alcohol response (AR), environmental factors may also play a role. This study examined effects of physical context on AR using a between subjects placebo-controlled design. There were 157 (57{\%} male) participants (ages 21-30) who were randomized to 1 of 4 conditions based on beverage (placebo or alcohol [target BrAC = .08 g{\%}]) and physical context (simulated bar or traditional lab). AR was assessed using the Subjective Effects of Alcohol Scale and the Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale, as well as behavioral tasks including the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) and its negative reinforcement counterpart (MRBURNS). A beverage condition by context interaction emerged for low arousal positive subjective response (SR), and among women, for performance on the BART task. In the lab context only, alcohol (relative to placebo) was associated with stronger low arousal positive SR and, for women, with impaired performance on the BART task. This suggests that a less stimulating lab context may be better suited to differentiating positive alcohol effects from expectancies, whereas a bar context may be better suited to detecting expectancy effects. The findings also suggest that the ability to better appreciate positive alcohol effects (relative to expectations) in less stimulating contexts may lead to a strengthening of these effects among individuals who drink in these environments.",
keywords = "BART, Physical context, Placebo control, Subjective effects of alcohol scale, Subjective response",
author = "Corbin, {William R.} and Caitlin Scott and Stephen Boyd and Menary, {Kyle R.} and Enders, {Craig K.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/a0038760",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "59--70",
journal = "Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology",
issn = "1064-1297",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contextual influences on subjective and behavioral responses to alcohol

AU - Corbin, William R.

AU - Scott, Caitlin

AU - Boyd, Stephen

AU - Menary, Kyle R.

AU - Enders, Craig K.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Differential sensitivity to alcohol effects (e.g., increased stimulation and decreased sedation) is associated with heavier use and problems. Although genetic factors contribute to alcohol response (AR), environmental factors may also play a role. This study examined effects of physical context on AR using a between subjects placebo-controlled design. There were 157 (57% male) participants (ages 21-30) who were randomized to 1 of 4 conditions based on beverage (placebo or alcohol [target BrAC = .08 g%]) and physical context (simulated bar or traditional lab). AR was assessed using the Subjective Effects of Alcohol Scale and the Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale, as well as behavioral tasks including the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) and its negative reinforcement counterpart (MRBURNS). A beverage condition by context interaction emerged for low arousal positive subjective response (SR), and among women, for performance on the BART task. In the lab context only, alcohol (relative to placebo) was associated with stronger low arousal positive SR and, for women, with impaired performance on the BART task. This suggests that a less stimulating lab context may be better suited to differentiating positive alcohol effects from expectancies, whereas a bar context may be better suited to detecting expectancy effects. The findings also suggest that the ability to better appreciate positive alcohol effects (relative to expectations) in less stimulating contexts may lead to a strengthening of these effects among individuals who drink in these environments.

AB - Differential sensitivity to alcohol effects (e.g., increased stimulation and decreased sedation) is associated with heavier use and problems. Although genetic factors contribute to alcohol response (AR), environmental factors may also play a role. This study examined effects of physical context on AR using a between subjects placebo-controlled design. There were 157 (57% male) participants (ages 21-30) who were randomized to 1 of 4 conditions based on beverage (placebo or alcohol [target BrAC = .08 g%]) and physical context (simulated bar or traditional lab). AR was assessed using the Subjective Effects of Alcohol Scale and the Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale, as well as behavioral tasks including the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) and its negative reinforcement counterpart (MRBURNS). A beverage condition by context interaction emerged for low arousal positive subjective response (SR), and among women, for performance on the BART task. In the lab context only, alcohol (relative to placebo) was associated with stronger low arousal positive SR and, for women, with impaired performance on the BART task. This suggests that a less stimulating lab context may be better suited to differentiating positive alcohol effects from expectancies, whereas a bar context may be better suited to detecting expectancy effects. The findings also suggest that the ability to better appreciate positive alcohol effects (relative to expectations) in less stimulating contexts may lead to a strengthening of these effects among individuals who drink in these environments.

KW - BART

KW - Physical context

KW - Placebo control

KW - Subjective effects of alcohol scale

KW - Subjective response

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925688444&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925688444&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0038760

DO - 10.1037/a0038760

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 59

EP - 70

JO - Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology

JF - Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology

SN - 1064-1297

IS - 1

ER -