Constructing high-stakes surgical decisions: It's better to die trying

Michael J. Nabozny, Jacqueline M. Kruser, Nicole M. Steffens, Karen Brasel, Toby C. Campbell, Martha E. Gaines, Margaret L. Schwarze

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To explore high-stakes surgical decision making from the perspective of seniors and surgeons. Background: A majority of older chronically ill patients would decline a low-risk procedure if the outcome was severe functional impairment. However, 25% of Medicare beneficiaries have surgery in their last 3 months of life, which may be inconsistent with their preferences. How patients make decisions to have surgery may contribute to this problem of unwanted care. Methods: We convened 4 focus groups at senior centers and 2 groups of surgeons in Madison and Milwaukee, Wisconsin, where we showed a video about a decision regarding a choice between surgery and palliative care. We used qualitative content analysis to identify themes about communication and explanatory models for end-of-life treatment decisions. Results: Seniors (n=37) and surgeons (n=17) agreed that maximizing quality of life should guide treatment decisions for older patients. However, when faced with an acute choice between surgery and palliative care, seniors viewed this either as a choice between life and death or a decision about how to die. Although surgeons agreed that very frail patients should not have surgery, they held conflicting views about presenting treatment options. Conclusions: Seniors and surgeons highly value quality of life, but this notion is difficult to incorporate in acute surgical decisions. Some seniors use these values to consider a choice between surgery and palliative care, whereas others view this as a simple choice between life and death. Surgeons acknowledge challenges framing decisions and describe a clinical momentum that promotes surgical intervention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)64-70
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of Surgery
Volume263
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Palliative Care
Senior Centers
Quality of Life
Value of Life
Medicare
Focus Groups
Surgeons
Decision Making
Chronic Disease
Therapeutics
Communication

Keywords

  • Communication
  • End-of-life
  • Ethics
  • High-risk surgery
  • Palliative care
  • Surgical decision making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Nabozny, M. J., Kruser, J. M., Steffens, N. M., Brasel, K., Campbell, T. C., Gaines, M. E., & Schwarze, M. L. (2016). Constructing high-stakes surgical decisions: It's better to die trying. Annals of Surgery, 263(1), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001081

Constructing high-stakes surgical decisions : It's better to die trying. / Nabozny, Michael J.; Kruser, Jacqueline M.; Steffens, Nicole M.; Brasel, Karen; Campbell, Toby C.; Gaines, Martha E.; Schwarze, Margaret L.

In: Annals of Surgery, Vol. 263, No. 1, 2016, p. 64-70.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nabozny, MJ, Kruser, JM, Steffens, NM, Brasel, K, Campbell, TC, Gaines, ME & Schwarze, ML 2016, 'Constructing high-stakes surgical decisions: It's better to die trying', Annals of Surgery, vol. 263, no. 1, pp. 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001081
Nabozny, Michael J. ; Kruser, Jacqueline M. ; Steffens, Nicole M. ; Brasel, Karen ; Campbell, Toby C. ; Gaines, Martha E. ; Schwarze, Margaret L. / Constructing high-stakes surgical decisions : It's better to die trying. In: Annals of Surgery. 2016 ; Vol. 263, No. 1. pp. 64-70.
@article{2eee23006ae24f61be23c408b7a1e079,
title = "Constructing high-stakes surgical decisions: It's better to die trying",
abstract = "Objective: To explore high-stakes surgical decision making from the perspective of seniors and surgeons. Background: A majority of older chronically ill patients would decline a low-risk procedure if the outcome was severe functional impairment. However, 25{\%} of Medicare beneficiaries have surgery in their last 3 months of life, which may be inconsistent with their preferences. How patients make decisions to have surgery may contribute to this problem of unwanted care. Methods: We convened 4 focus groups at senior centers and 2 groups of surgeons in Madison and Milwaukee, Wisconsin, where we showed a video about a decision regarding a choice between surgery and palliative care. We used qualitative content analysis to identify themes about communication and explanatory models for end-of-life treatment decisions. Results: Seniors (n=37) and surgeons (n=17) agreed that maximizing quality of life should guide treatment decisions for older patients. However, when faced with an acute choice between surgery and palliative care, seniors viewed this either as a choice between life and death or a decision about how to die. Although surgeons agreed that very frail patients should not have surgery, they held conflicting views about presenting treatment options. Conclusions: Seniors and surgeons highly value quality of life, but this notion is difficult to incorporate in acute surgical decisions. Some seniors use these values to consider a choice between surgery and palliative care, whereas others view this as a simple choice between life and death. Surgeons acknowledge challenges framing decisions and describe a clinical momentum that promotes surgical intervention.",
keywords = "Communication, End-of-life, Ethics, High-risk surgery, Palliative care, Surgical decision making",
author = "Nabozny, {Michael J.} and Kruser, {Jacqueline M.} and Steffens, {Nicole M.} and Karen Brasel and Campbell, {Toby C.} and Gaines, {Martha E.} and Schwarze, {Margaret L.}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1097/SLA.0000000000001081",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "263",
pages = "64--70",
journal = "Annals of Surgery",
issn = "0003-4932",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Constructing high-stakes surgical decisions

T2 - It's better to die trying

AU - Nabozny, Michael J.

AU - Kruser, Jacqueline M.

AU - Steffens, Nicole M.

AU - Brasel, Karen

AU - Campbell, Toby C.

AU - Gaines, Martha E.

AU - Schwarze, Margaret L.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Objective: To explore high-stakes surgical decision making from the perspective of seniors and surgeons. Background: A majority of older chronically ill patients would decline a low-risk procedure if the outcome was severe functional impairment. However, 25% of Medicare beneficiaries have surgery in their last 3 months of life, which may be inconsistent with their preferences. How patients make decisions to have surgery may contribute to this problem of unwanted care. Methods: We convened 4 focus groups at senior centers and 2 groups of surgeons in Madison and Milwaukee, Wisconsin, where we showed a video about a decision regarding a choice between surgery and palliative care. We used qualitative content analysis to identify themes about communication and explanatory models for end-of-life treatment decisions. Results: Seniors (n=37) and surgeons (n=17) agreed that maximizing quality of life should guide treatment decisions for older patients. However, when faced with an acute choice between surgery and palliative care, seniors viewed this either as a choice between life and death or a decision about how to die. Although surgeons agreed that very frail patients should not have surgery, they held conflicting views about presenting treatment options. Conclusions: Seniors and surgeons highly value quality of life, but this notion is difficult to incorporate in acute surgical decisions. Some seniors use these values to consider a choice between surgery and palliative care, whereas others view this as a simple choice between life and death. Surgeons acknowledge challenges framing decisions and describe a clinical momentum that promotes surgical intervention.

AB - Objective: To explore high-stakes surgical decision making from the perspective of seniors and surgeons. Background: A majority of older chronically ill patients would decline a low-risk procedure if the outcome was severe functional impairment. However, 25% of Medicare beneficiaries have surgery in their last 3 months of life, which may be inconsistent with their preferences. How patients make decisions to have surgery may contribute to this problem of unwanted care. Methods: We convened 4 focus groups at senior centers and 2 groups of surgeons in Madison and Milwaukee, Wisconsin, where we showed a video about a decision regarding a choice between surgery and palliative care. We used qualitative content analysis to identify themes about communication and explanatory models for end-of-life treatment decisions. Results: Seniors (n=37) and surgeons (n=17) agreed that maximizing quality of life should guide treatment decisions for older patients. However, when faced with an acute choice between surgery and palliative care, seniors viewed this either as a choice between life and death or a decision about how to die. Although surgeons agreed that very frail patients should not have surgery, they held conflicting views about presenting treatment options. Conclusions: Seniors and surgeons highly value quality of life, but this notion is difficult to incorporate in acute surgical decisions. Some seniors use these values to consider a choice between surgery and palliative care, whereas others view this as a simple choice between life and death. Surgeons acknowledge challenges framing decisions and describe a clinical momentum that promotes surgical intervention.

KW - Communication

KW - End-of-life

KW - Ethics

KW - High-risk surgery

KW - Palliative care

KW - Surgical decision making

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953835844&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953835844&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001081

DO - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001081

M3 - Article

C2 - 25563878

AN - SCOPUS:84953835844

VL - 263

SP - 64

EP - 70

JO - Annals of Surgery

JF - Annals of Surgery

SN - 0003-4932

IS - 1

ER -