Consistency in Administration and Response for the Backward Push and Release Test: A Clinical Assessment of Postural Responses

Beth A. Smith, Patricia Carlson-Kuhta, Fay Horak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Purpose: The backward push and release test (PRT) is a standardized clinical test of postural responses elicited by perturbations. Our goal was to determine reliability of administration and response. This will inform clinical administration and determine whether to develop an instrumented version. Methods: One examiner administered 10 backward PRT trials to adults with Parkinson disease (12), multiple sclerosis (14) and controls (12). We used three-dimensional motion analysis, force plates and instrumented gloves to measure administration and response. Administration variables were angle of posterior trunk lean and the distance of the centre of mass (CoM) behind the ankle. Postural response variables were latency of postural response from release to step initiation and first compensatory step length. Reliability was measured using the range of variables across trials, comparison of first and later trials, intraclass correlations (ICCs) to measure consistency and correlations between administration and response. Results: There was inherent variability in administration, which affected postural response characteristics. Larger trunk angle and greater CoM-ankle distance were correlated with shorter postural response latencies and larger step lengths. Participant height also had an effect; taller participants had larger trunk angles prior to release resulting in longer latencies and larger step lengths. Using ICCs, consistency of trunk angle was likely acceptable and CoM-ankle distance was high. Consistency of latency was low, while step length was likely acceptable. Discussion: Despite variability in administration and inconsistency in response, different postural response characteristics were detected between patients with different disease states. Based on these results, we will create algorithms to instrument the PRT using inertial movement sensors to collect more sensitive measures of postural responses than observational clinical rating scales. Feedback for appropriate lean angle and calibration for participant height will improve consistency and usefulness of the instrumented PRT.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)36-46
Number of pages11
JournalPhysiotherapy Research International
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

Ankle
Reaction Time
Calibration
Multiple Sclerosis
test
perturbation
sensor
calibration
Feedback
Sensors
trial

Keywords

  • Movement
  • Nervous system diseases
  • Postural balance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Consistency in Administration and Response for the Backward Push and Release Test : A Clinical Assessment of Postural Responses. / Smith, Beth A.; Carlson-Kuhta, Patricia; Horak, Fay.

In: Physiotherapy Research International, Vol. 21, No. 1, 01.03.2016, p. 36-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c0d854eaddea40f28788d3260c0b70e7,
title = "Consistency in Administration and Response for the Backward Push and Release Test: A Clinical Assessment of Postural Responses",
abstract = "Background and Purpose: The backward push and release test (PRT) is a standardized clinical test of postural responses elicited by perturbations. Our goal was to determine reliability of administration and response. This will inform clinical administration and determine whether to develop an instrumented version. Methods: One examiner administered 10 backward PRT trials to adults with Parkinson disease (12), multiple sclerosis (14) and controls (12). We used three-dimensional motion analysis, force plates and instrumented gloves to measure administration and response. Administration variables were angle of posterior trunk lean and the distance of the centre of mass (CoM) behind the ankle. Postural response variables were latency of postural response from release to step initiation and first compensatory step length. Reliability was measured using the range of variables across trials, comparison of first and later trials, intraclass correlations (ICCs) to measure consistency and correlations between administration and response. Results: There was inherent variability in administration, which affected postural response characteristics. Larger trunk angle and greater CoM-ankle distance were correlated with shorter postural response latencies and larger step lengths. Participant height also had an effect; taller participants had larger trunk angles prior to release resulting in longer latencies and larger step lengths. Using ICCs, consistency of trunk angle was likely acceptable and CoM-ankle distance was high. Consistency of latency was low, while step length was likely acceptable. Discussion: Despite variability in administration and inconsistency in response, different postural response characteristics were detected between patients with different disease states. Based on these results, we will create algorithms to instrument the PRT using inertial movement sensors to collect more sensitive measures of postural responses than observational clinical rating scales. Feedback for appropriate lean angle and calibration for participant height will improve consistency and usefulness of the instrumented PRT.",
keywords = "Movement, Nervous system diseases, Postural balance",
author = "Smith, {Beth A.} and Patricia Carlson-Kuhta and Fay Horak",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/pri.1615",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "36--46",
journal = "Environmental Quality Management",
issn = "1088-1913",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Consistency in Administration and Response for the Backward Push and Release Test

T2 - A Clinical Assessment of Postural Responses

AU - Smith, Beth A.

AU - Carlson-Kuhta, Patricia

AU - Horak, Fay

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Background and Purpose: The backward push and release test (PRT) is a standardized clinical test of postural responses elicited by perturbations. Our goal was to determine reliability of administration and response. This will inform clinical administration and determine whether to develop an instrumented version. Methods: One examiner administered 10 backward PRT trials to adults with Parkinson disease (12), multiple sclerosis (14) and controls (12). We used three-dimensional motion analysis, force plates and instrumented gloves to measure administration and response. Administration variables were angle of posterior trunk lean and the distance of the centre of mass (CoM) behind the ankle. Postural response variables were latency of postural response from release to step initiation and first compensatory step length. Reliability was measured using the range of variables across trials, comparison of first and later trials, intraclass correlations (ICCs) to measure consistency and correlations between administration and response. Results: There was inherent variability in administration, which affected postural response characteristics. Larger trunk angle and greater CoM-ankle distance were correlated with shorter postural response latencies and larger step lengths. Participant height also had an effect; taller participants had larger trunk angles prior to release resulting in longer latencies and larger step lengths. Using ICCs, consistency of trunk angle was likely acceptable and CoM-ankle distance was high. Consistency of latency was low, while step length was likely acceptable. Discussion: Despite variability in administration and inconsistency in response, different postural response characteristics were detected between patients with different disease states. Based on these results, we will create algorithms to instrument the PRT using inertial movement sensors to collect more sensitive measures of postural responses than observational clinical rating scales. Feedback for appropriate lean angle and calibration for participant height will improve consistency and usefulness of the instrumented PRT.

AB - Background and Purpose: The backward push and release test (PRT) is a standardized clinical test of postural responses elicited by perturbations. Our goal was to determine reliability of administration and response. This will inform clinical administration and determine whether to develop an instrumented version. Methods: One examiner administered 10 backward PRT trials to adults with Parkinson disease (12), multiple sclerosis (14) and controls (12). We used three-dimensional motion analysis, force plates and instrumented gloves to measure administration and response. Administration variables were angle of posterior trunk lean and the distance of the centre of mass (CoM) behind the ankle. Postural response variables were latency of postural response from release to step initiation and first compensatory step length. Reliability was measured using the range of variables across trials, comparison of first and later trials, intraclass correlations (ICCs) to measure consistency and correlations between administration and response. Results: There was inherent variability in administration, which affected postural response characteristics. Larger trunk angle and greater CoM-ankle distance were correlated with shorter postural response latencies and larger step lengths. Participant height also had an effect; taller participants had larger trunk angles prior to release resulting in longer latencies and larger step lengths. Using ICCs, consistency of trunk angle was likely acceptable and CoM-ankle distance was high. Consistency of latency was low, while step length was likely acceptable. Discussion: Despite variability in administration and inconsistency in response, different postural response characteristics were detected between patients with different disease states. Based on these results, we will create algorithms to instrument the PRT using inertial movement sensors to collect more sensitive measures of postural responses than observational clinical rating scales. Feedback for appropriate lean angle and calibration for participant height will improve consistency and usefulness of the instrumented PRT.

KW - Movement

KW - Nervous system diseases

KW - Postural balance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959574559&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959574559&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/pri.1615

DO - 10.1002/pri.1615

M3 - Article

C2 - 25431128

AN - SCOPUS:84959574559

VL - 21

SP - 36

EP - 46

JO - Environmental Quality Management

JF - Environmental Quality Management

SN - 1088-1913

IS - 1

ER -