Consensus training

An effective tool to minimize variations in periodontal diagnosis and treatment planning among dental faculty and students

Vanchit John, Seung Jun Lee, Sivaraman Prakasam, George J. Eckert, Gerardo Maupome

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Considerable disagreements and variations exist in diagnosis and treatment planning of periodontal disease. Achieving high interrater periodontal diagnosis can prove challenging. The objectives of this study were to measure variations in periodontal diagnosis and treatment planning among predoctoral periodontics faculty members after consensus training and to compare such variation with those identified in third- and fourth-year dental students. Nine electronically stored case vignettes and survey instruments were made available to eighteen faculty members and twenty dental students under standardized conditions. A chi-square test was used to compare responses between groups, and multirater kappa tests were used to evaluate interrater agreement/reliability. Of the nine cases, only one differed between groups significantly in terms of treatment. Also, third-year students differed from fourth-year students on the diagnosis of aggressive periodontitis versus chronic periodontitis. Most respondents were able to distinguish clearly among diagnoses of chronic periodontitis, aggressive periodontitis, and gingivitis. This study established a baseline assessment of the current status of consensus after training. We will reassess variations after addressing the specific challenges identified. Programs designed and implemented to help decrease the variation in periodontal diagnosis and treatment planning among faculty members may ultimately translate into better agreement and better standardization of dental instruction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1022-1032
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Dental Education
Volume77
Issue number8
StatePublished - Aug 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dental Faculties
Dental Students
planning
Aggressive Periodontitis
Chronic Periodontitis
student
Therapeutics
Periodontics
Students
Gingivitis
Periodontal Diseases
Chi-Square Distribution
Tooth
Group
instruction
Disease

Keywords

  • Calibration
  • Clinical education
  • Clinical evaluation
  • Consensus training
  • Dental education
  • Diagnosis
  • Educational methodology
  • Interrater reliability
  • Periodontal disease
  • Periodontics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Consensus training : An effective tool to minimize variations in periodontal diagnosis and treatment planning among dental faculty and students. / John, Vanchit; Lee, Seung Jun; Prakasam, Sivaraman; Eckert, George J.; Maupome, Gerardo.

In: Journal of Dental Education, Vol. 77, No. 8, 01.08.2013, p. 1022-1032.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{360ccd462ec7404986319fc38d47d706,
title = "Consensus training: An effective tool to minimize variations in periodontal diagnosis and treatment planning among dental faculty and students",
abstract = "Considerable disagreements and variations exist in diagnosis and treatment planning of periodontal disease. Achieving high interrater periodontal diagnosis can prove challenging. The objectives of this study were to measure variations in periodontal diagnosis and treatment planning among predoctoral periodontics faculty members after consensus training and to compare such variation with those identified in third- and fourth-year dental students. Nine electronically stored case vignettes and survey instruments were made available to eighteen faculty members and twenty dental students under standardized conditions. A chi-square test was used to compare responses between groups, and multirater kappa tests were used to evaluate interrater agreement/reliability. Of the nine cases, only one differed between groups significantly in terms of treatment. Also, third-year students differed from fourth-year students on the diagnosis of aggressive periodontitis versus chronic periodontitis. Most respondents were able to distinguish clearly among diagnoses of chronic periodontitis, aggressive periodontitis, and gingivitis. This study established a baseline assessment of the current status of consensus after training. We will reassess variations after addressing the specific challenges identified. Programs designed and implemented to help decrease the variation in periodontal diagnosis and treatment planning among faculty members may ultimately translate into better agreement and better standardization of dental instruction.",
keywords = "Calibration, Clinical education, Clinical evaluation, Consensus training, Dental education, Diagnosis, Educational methodology, Interrater reliability, Periodontal disease, Periodontics",
author = "Vanchit John and Lee, {Seung Jun} and Sivaraman Prakasam and Eckert, {George J.} and Gerardo Maupome",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "77",
pages = "1022--1032",
journal = "Journal of Dental Education",
issn = "0022-0337",
publisher = "American Dental Education Association",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Consensus training

T2 - An effective tool to minimize variations in periodontal diagnosis and treatment planning among dental faculty and students

AU - John, Vanchit

AU - Lee, Seung Jun

AU - Prakasam, Sivaraman

AU - Eckert, George J.

AU - Maupome, Gerardo

PY - 2013/8/1

Y1 - 2013/8/1

N2 - Considerable disagreements and variations exist in diagnosis and treatment planning of periodontal disease. Achieving high interrater periodontal diagnosis can prove challenging. The objectives of this study were to measure variations in periodontal diagnosis and treatment planning among predoctoral periodontics faculty members after consensus training and to compare such variation with those identified in third- and fourth-year dental students. Nine electronically stored case vignettes and survey instruments were made available to eighteen faculty members and twenty dental students under standardized conditions. A chi-square test was used to compare responses between groups, and multirater kappa tests were used to evaluate interrater agreement/reliability. Of the nine cases, only one differed between groups significantly in terms of treatment. Also, third-year students differed from fourth-year students on the diagnosis of aggressive periodontitis versus chronic periodontitis. Most respondents were able to distinguish clearly among diagnoses of chronic periodontitis, aggressive periodontitis, and gingivitis. This study established a baseline assessment of the current status of consensus after training. We will reassess variations after addressing the specific challenges identified. Programs designed and implemented to help decrease the variation in periodontal diagnosis and treatment planning among faculty members may ultimately translate into better agreement and better standardization of dental instruction.

AB - Considerable disagreements and variations exist in diagnosis and treatment planning of periodontal disease. Achieving high interrater periodontal diagnosis can prove challenging. The objectives of this study were to measure variations in periodontal diagnosis and treatment planning among predoctoral periodontics faculty members after consensus training and to compare such variation with those identified in third- and fourth-year dental students. Nine electronically stored case vignettes and survey instruments were made available to eighteen faculty members and twenty dental students under standardized conditions. A chi-square test was used to compare responses between groups, and multirater kappa tests were used to evaluate interrater agreement/reliability. Of the nine cases, only one differed between groups significantly in terms of treatment. Also, third-year students differed from fourth-year students on the diagnosis of aggressive periodontitis versus chronic periodontitis. Most respondents were able to distinguish clearly among diagnoses of chronic periodontitis, aggressive periodontitis, and gingivitis. This study established a baseline assessment of the current status of consensus after training. We will reassess variations after addressing the specific challenges identified. Programs designed and implemented to help decrease the variation in periodontal diagnosis and treatment planning among faculty members may ultimately translate into better agreement and better standardization of dental instruction.

KW - Calibration

KW - Clinical education

KW - Clinical evaluation

KW - Consensus training

KW - Dental education

KW - Diagnosis

KW - Educational methodology

KW - Interrater reliability

KW - Periodontal disease

KW - Periodontics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882369051&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84882369051&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 77

SP - 1022

EP - 1032

JO - Journal of Dental Education

JF - Journal of Dental Education

SN - 0022-0337

IS - 8

ER -