Consensus conference on core radiological parameters to describe lumbar stenosis - an initiative for structured reporting

Gustav Andreisek, Richard (Rick) Deyo, Jeffrey G. Jarvik, Francois Porchet, Sebastian F X Winklhofer, Johann Steurer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To define radiological criteria and parameters as a minimum standard in a structured radiological report for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and to identify criteria and parameters for research purposes.

Material and methods: All available radiological criteria and parameters for LSS were identified using systematic literature reviews and a Delphi survey. We invited to the consensus meeting, and provided data, to 15 internationally renowned experts from different countries. During the meeting, these experts reached consensus in a structured and systematic discussion about a core list of radiological criteria and parameters for standard reporting.

Results: We identified a total of 27 radiological criteria and parameters for LSS. During the meeting, the experts identified five of these as core items for a structured report. For central stenosis, these were “compromise of the central zone” and “relation between fluid and cauda equina”. For lateral stenosis, the group agreed that “nerve root compression in the lateral recess” was a core item. For foraminal stenosis, we included “nerve root impingement” and “compromise of the foraminal zone”.

Conclusion: As a minimum standard, five radiological criteria should be used in a structured radiological report in LSS. Other parameters are well suited for research.

Key Points: • The five most important radiological criteria for standard clinical reporting were selected.

• The five most important quantitative radiological parameters for research purposes were selected.

• These core criteria could help standardize the communication between health care providers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3224-3232
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Radiology
Volume24
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 14 2014

Fingerprint

Spinal Stenosis
Pathologic Constriction
Consensus
Research
Cauda Equina
Radiculopathy
Health Personnel
Communication

Keywords

  • Low back pain
  • Lumbar spinal stenosis
  • Lumbar spine
  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Structured reporting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Consensus conference on core radiological parameters to describe lumbar stenosis - an initiative for structured reporting. / Andreisek, Gustav; Deyo, Richard (Rick); Jarvik, Jeffrey G.; Porchet, Francois; Winklhofer, Sebastian F X; Steurer, Johann.

In: European Radiology, Vol. 24, No. 12, 14.11.2014, p. 3224-3232.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Andreisek, Gustav ; Deyo, Richard (Rick) ; Jarvik, Jeffrey G. ; Porchet, Francois ; Winklhofer, Sebastian F X ; Steurer, Johann. / Consensus conference on core radiological parameters to describe lumbar stenosis - an initiative for structured reporting. In: European Radiology. 2014 ; Vol. 24, No. 12. pp. 3224-3232.
@article{596fa31460fe45cb9f6c356c573486e4,
title = "Consensus conference on core radiological parameters to describe lumbar stenosis - an initiative for structured reporting",
abstract = "Purpose: To define radiological criteria and parameters as a minimum standard in a structured radiological report for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and to identify criteria and parameters for research purposes.Material and methods: All available radiological criteria and parameters for LSS were identified using systematic literature reviews and a Delphi survey. We invited to the consensus meeting, and provided data, to 15 internationally renowned experts from different countries. During the meeting, these experts reached consensus in a structured and systematic discussion about a core list of radiological criteria and parameters for standard reporting.Results: We identified a total of 27 radiological criteria and parameters for LSS. During the meeting, the experts identified five of these as core items for a structured report. For central stenosis, these were “compromise of the central zone” and “relation between fluid and cauda equina”. For lateral stenosis, the group agreed that “nerve root compression in the lateral recess” was a core item. For foraminal stenosis, we included “nerve root impingement” and “compromise of the foraminal zone”.Conclusion: As a minimum standard, five radiological criteria should be used in a structured radiological report in LSS. Other parameters are well suited for research.Key Points: • The five most important radiological criteria for standard clinical reporting were selected.• The five most important quantitative radiological parameters for research purposes were selected.• These core criteria could help standardize the communication between health care providers.",
keywords = "Low back pain, Lumbar spinal stenosis, Lumbar spine, Magnetic resonance imaging, Structured reporting",
author = "Gustav Andreisek and Deyo, {Richard (Rick)} and Jarvik, {Jeffrey G.} and Francois Porchet and Winklhofer, {Sebastian F X} and Johann Steurer",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1007/s00330-014-3346-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "3224--3232",
journal = "European Radiology",
issn = "0938-7994",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Consensus conference on core radiological parameters to describe lumbar stenosis - an initiative for structured reporting

AU - Andreisek, Gustav

AU - Deyo, Richard (Rick)

AU - Jarvik, Jeffrey G.

AU - Porchet, Francois

AU - Winklhofer, Sebastian F X

AU - Steurer, Johann

PY - 2014/11/14

Y1 - 2014/11/14

N2 - Purpose: To define radiological criteria and parameters as a minimum standard in a structured radiological report for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and to identify criteria and parameters for research purposes.Material and methods: All available radiological criteria and parameters for LSS were identified using systematic literature reviews and a Delphi survey. We invited to the consensus meeting, and provided data, to 15 internationally renowned experts from different countries. During the meeting, these experts reached consensus in a structured and systematic discussion about a core list of radiological criteria and parameters for standard reporting.Results: We identified a total of 27 radiological criteria and parameters for LSS. During the meeting, the experts identified five of these as core items for a structured report. For central stenosis, these were “compromise of the central zone” and “relation between fluid and cauda equina”. For lateral stenosis, the group agreed that “nerve root compression in the lateral recess” was a core item. For foraminal stenosis, we included “nerve root impingement” and “compromise of the foraminal zone”.Conclusion: As a minimum standard, five radiological criteria should be used in a structured radiological report in LSS. Other parameters are well suited for research.Key Points: • The five most important radiological criteria for standard clinical reporting were selected.• The five most important quantitative radiological parameters for research purposes were selected.• These core criteria could help standardize the communication between health care providers.

AB - Purpose: To define radiological criteria and parameters as a minimum standard in a structured radiological report for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and to identify criteria and parameters for research purposes.Material and methods: All available radiological criteria and parameters for LSS were identified using systematic literature reviews and a Delphi survey. We invited to the consensus meeting, and provided data, to 15 internationally renowned experts from different countries. During the meeting, these experts reached consensus in a structured and systematic discussion about a core list of radiological criteria and parameters for standard reporting.Results: We identified a total of 27 radiological criteria and parameters for LSS. During the meeting, the experts identified five of these as core items for a structured report. For central stenosis, these were “compromise of the central zone” and “relation between fluid and cauda equina”. For lateral stenosis, the group agreed that “nerve root compression in the lateral recess” was a core item. For foraminal stenosis, we included “nerve root impingement” and “compromise of the foraminal zone”.Conclusion: As a minimum standard, five radiological criteria should be used in a structured radiological report in LSS. Other parameters are well suited for research.Key Points: • The five most important radiological criteria for standard clinical reporting were selected.• The five most important quantitative radiological parameters for research purposes were selected.• These core criteria could help standardize the communication between health care providers.

KW - Low back pain

KW - Lumbar spinal stenosis

KW - Lumbar spine

KW - Magnetic resonance imaging

KW - Structured reporting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84911811960&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84911811960&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00330-014-3346-z

DO - 10.1007/s00330-014-3346-z

M3 - Article

C2 - 25079488

AN - SCOPUS:84911811960

VL - 24

SP - 3224

EP - 3232

JO - European Radiology

JF - European Radiology

SN - 0938-7994

IS - 12

ER -