Conceptualizing risk and effectiveness: A qualitative study of women's and providers' perceptions of nonsurgical female permanent contraception

Elizabeth K. Harrington, Diana Gordon, Isabel Osgood-Roach, Jeffrey Jensen, Jennifer Aengst

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective Novel approaches to nonsurgical permanent contraception (NSPC) for women that are low cost and require no incision or hysteroscope/surgical equipment could improve access to, and the acceptability of, permanent contraception (PC). To better understand opportunities and limitations for NSPC approaches, we examined women's and obstetrician-gynecologist (OB/GYN) providers' perceptions of NSPC in Portland, OR. Study design Semistructured, qualitative interviews were conducted with 40 women recruited from outpatient clinics with purposive sampling, and a focus group was conducted with 9 OB/GYNs in academic and community practice. Transcripts were coded and inductively analyzed with a grounded theory approach. Results The majority of women identified as white (67%) or Latina (25%). They had a median age of 31.5 years, and median number of children was one. Perspectives on NSPC were closely aligned with women's general attitudes towards PC; over half were considering PC for themselves or partners in the future. Most respondents valued multiple aspects of a nonsurgical approach, with themes of minimizing recovery time, invasiveness and risk and avoiding hormonal contraception. Many assumed that NSPC would be less effective than surgery, however, and felt that a confirmation test would be necessary regardless of the failure rate. Providers welcomed efforts to expand contraceptive choice with NSPC, but would require long-term safety and efficacy data before recommending, and voiced concerns that NSPC's potential relative ease of administration could undermine the inherent seriousness of choosing PC. Conclusions Women's and providers' perceptions of NSPC hinged on the ways in which they conceptualized risk and effectiveness. While perceptions were generally favorable, confirmation of safety and effectiveness would be required for a new approach to be accepted. Implications This hypothesis-generating study elucidates women's and provider's perspectives on new methods of NSPC and contributes to understanding their perceptions of various types of risk. A technique to verify tubal occlusion would be needed for women and providers to accept NSPC.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)128-134
Number of pages7
JournalContraception
Volume92
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2015

Fingerprint

Contraception
Hysteroscopes
Surgical Equipment
Safety
Tubal Sterilization
Contraceptive Agents
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Focus Groups
Hispanic Americans
Interviews

Keywords

  • Contraceptive development
  • Perception
  • Permanent contraception
  • Qualitative
  • Risk
  • Sterilization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Conceptualizing risk and effectiveness : A qualitative study of women's and providers' perceptions of nonsurgical female permanent contraception. / Harrington, Elizabeth K.; Gordon, Diana; Osgood-Roach, Isabel; Jensen, Jeffrey; Aengst, Jennifer.

In: Contraception, Vol. 92, No. 2, 01.08.2015, p. 128-134.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harrington, Elizabeth K. ; Gordon, Diana ; Osgood-Roach, Isabel ; Jensen, Jeffrey ; Aengst, Jennifer. / Conceptualizing risk and effectiveness : A qualitative study of women's and providers' perceptions of nonsurgical female permanent contraception. In: Contraception. 2015 ; Vol. 92, No. 2. pp. 128-134.
@article{72b3586caeed4a25a680844f54cfd724,
title = "Conceptualizing risk and effectiveness: A qualitative study of women's and providers' perceptions of nonsurgical female permanent contraception",
abstract = "Objective Novel approaches to nonsurgical permanent contraception (NSPC) for women that are low cost and require no incision or hysteroscope/surgical equipment could improve access to, and the acceptability of, permanent contraception (PC). To better understand opportunities and limitations for NSPC approaches, we examined women's and obstetrician-gynecologist (OB/GYN) providers' perceptions of NSPC in Portland, OR. Study design Semistructured, qualitative interviews were conducted with 40 women recruited from outpatient clinics with purposive sampling, and a focus group was conducted with 9 OB/GYNs in academic and community practice. Transcripts were coded and inductively analyzed with a grounded theory approach. Results The majority of women identified as white (67{\%}) or Latina (25{\%}). They had a median age of 31.5 years, and median number of children was one. Perspectives on NSPC were closely aligned with women's general attitudes towards PC; over half were considering PC for themselves or partners in the future. Most respondents valued multiple aspects of a nonsurgical approach, with themes of minimizing recovery time, invasiveness and risk and avoiding hormonal contraception. Many assumed that NSPC would be less effective than surgery, however, and felt that a confirmation test would be necessary regardless of the failure rate. Providers welcomed efforts to expand contraceptive choice with NSPC, but would require long-term safety and efficacy data before recommending, and voiced concerns that NSPC's potential relative ease of administration could undermine the inherent seriousness of choosing PC. Conclusions Women's and providers' perceptions of NSPC hinged on the ways in which they conceptualized risk and effectiveness. While perceptions were generally favorable, confirmation of safety and effectiveness would be required for a new approach to be accepted. Implications This hypothesis-generating study elucidates women's and provider's perspectives on new methods of NSPC and contributes to understanding their perceptions of various types of risk. A technique to verify tubal occlusion would be needed for women and providers to accept NSPC.",
keywords = "Contraceptive development, Perception, Permanent contraception, Qualitative, Risk, Sterilization",
author = "Harrington, {Elizabeth K.} and Diana Gordon and Isabel Osgood-Roach and Jeffrey Jensen and Jennifer Aengst",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.contraception.2015.03.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "92",
pages = "128--134",
journal = "Contraception",
issn = "0010-7824",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conceptualizing risk and effectiveness

T2 - A qualitative study of women's and providers' perceptions of nonsurgical female permanent contraception

AU - Harrington, Elizabeth K.

AU - Gordon, Diana

AU - Osgood-Roach, Isabel

AU - Jensen, Jeffrey

AU - Aengst, Jennifer

PY - 2015/8/1

Y1 - 2015/8/1

N2 - Objective Novel approaches to nonsurgical permanent contraception (NSPC) for women that are low cost and require no incision or hysteroscope/surgical equipment could improve access to, and the acceptability of, permanent contraception (PC). To better understand opportunities and limitations for NSPC approaches, we examined women's and obstetrician-gynecologist (OB/GYN) providers' perceptions of NSPC in Portland, OR. Study design Semistructured, qualitative interviews were conducted with 40 women recruited from outpatient clinics with purposive sampling, and a focus group was conducted with 9 OB/GYNs in academic and community practice. Transcripts were coded and inductively analyzed with a grounded theory approach. Results The majority of women identified as white (67%) or Latina (25%). They had a median age of 31.5 years, and median number of children was one. Perspectives on NSPC were closely aligned with women's general attitudes towards PC; over half were considering PC for themselves or partners in the future. Most respondents valued multiple aspects of a nonsurgical approach, with themes of minimizing recovery time, invasiveness and risk and avoiding hormonal contraception. Many assumed that NSPC would be less effective than surgery, however, and felt that a confirmation test would be necessary regardless of the failure rate. Providers welcomed efforts to expand contraceptive choice with NSPC, but would require long-term safety and efficacy data before recommending, and voiced concerns that NSPC's potential relative ease of administration could undermine the inherent seriousness of choosing PC. Conclusions Women's and providers' perceptions of NSPC hinged on the ways in which they conceptualized risk and effectiveness. While perceptions were generally favorable, confirmation of safety and effectiveness would be required for a new approach to be accepted. Implications This hypothesis-generating study elucidates women's and provider's perspectives on new methods of NSPC and contributes to understanding their perceptions of various types of risk. A technique to verify tubal occlusion would be needed for women and providers to accept NSPC.

AB - Objective Novel approaches to nonsurgical permanent contraception (NSPC) for women that are low cost and require no incision or hysteroscope/surgical equipment could improve access to, and the acceptability of, permanent contraception (PC). To better understand opportunities and limitations for NSPC approaches, we examined women's and obstetrician-gynecologist (OB/GYN) providers' perceptions of NSPC in Portland, OR. Study design Semistructured, qualitative interviews were conducted with 40 women recruited from outpatient clinics with purposive sampling, and a focus group was conducted with 9 OB/GYNs in academic and community practice. Transcripts were coded and inductively analyzed with a grounded theory approach. Results The majority of women identified as white (67%) or Latina (25%). They had a median age of 31.5 years, and median number of children was one. Perspectives on NSPC were closely aligned with women's general attitudes towards PC; over half were considering PC for themselves or partners in the future. Most respondents valued multiple aspects of a nonsurgical approach, with themes of minimizing recovery time, invasiveness and risk and avoiding hormonal contraception. Many assumed that NSPC would be less effective than surgery, however, and felt that a confirmation test would be necessary regardless of the failure rate. Providers welcomed efforts to expand contraceptive choice with NSPC, but would require long-term safety and efficacy data before recommending, and voiced concerns that NSPC's potential relative ease of administration could undermine the inherent seriousness of choosing PC. Conclusions Women's and providers' perceptions of NSPC hinged on the ways in which they conceptualized risk and effectiveness. While perceptions were generally favorable, confirmation of safety and effectiveness would be required for a new approach to be accepted. Implications This hypothesis-generating study elucidates women's and provider's perspectives on new methods of NSPC and contributes to understanding their perceptions of various types of risk. A technique to verify tubal occlusion would be needed for women and providers to accept NSPC.

KW - Contraceptive development

KW - Perception

KW - Permanent contraception

KW - Qualitative

KW - Risk

KW - Sterilization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937521325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937521325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.03.002

DO - 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.03.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 25746293

AN - SCOPUS:84937521325

VL - 92

SP - 128

EP - 134

JO - Contraception

JF - Contraception

SN - 0010-7824

IS - 2

ER -