Complications and perioperative factors associated with learning the technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)

Darryl Lau, Jasmine G. Lee, Seunggu (Jude) Han, Daniel C. Lu, Dean Chou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

84 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Before the advent of minimally invasive spine surgery (MIS), open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) was performed to treat spondylosis, spondylolisthesis, and spondylolysis. Minimally invasive TLIF has recently become more popular based upon the premise that a smaller, less traumatic incision should afford better recovery and outcomes. However, the learning curve associated with this technique must be considered. To analyze the perioperative factors associated with the learning curve in patients who underwent MIS TLIF versus open TLIF, we identified 22 patients who underwent TLIF from 2005 to 2008 within levels L4-S1 by the senior author (D.C.). Patients were subdivided into two groups according to whether they underwent: (i) MIS TLIF (10 patients, the first MIS TLIF procedures performed by D.C.); or (ii) open TLIF (12 patients). Preoperative, perioperative and postoperative factors were evaluated. Patients who underwent MIS TLIF had a statistically significant lower intraoperative transfusion rate, and rate of required postoperative surgical drains; and shorter periods of required drainage, and time to ambulation. However, the MIS TLIF group tended to have a higher rate of complications, which might have been associated with the learning curve. Both groups had a minimum of 1-year follow-up.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)624-627
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Clinical Neuroscience
Volume18
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Spine
Learning
Learning Curve
Spondylolysis
Spondylosis
Spondylolisthesis
Statistical Factor Analysis
Walking
Drainage

Keywords

  • Complications
  • Learning curve
  • Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
  • Open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
  • Perioperative complications
  • TLIF

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Complications and perioperative factors associated with learning the technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). / Lau, Darryl; Lee, Jasmine G.; Han, Seunggu (Jude); Lu, Daniel C.; Chou, Dean.

In: Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, Vol. 18, No. 5, 01.05.2011, p. 624-627.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{acc1a857b6004f4bb2724a5a71c692ac,
title = "Complications and perioperative factors associated with learning the technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)",
abstract = "Before the advent of minimally invasive spine surgery (MIS), open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) was performed to treat spondylosis, spondylolisthesis, and spondylolysis. Minimally invasive TLIF has recently become more popular based upon the premise that a smaller, less traumatic incision should afford better recovery and outcomes. However, the learning curve associated with this technique must be considered. To analyze the perioperative factors associated with the learning curve in patients who underwent MIS TLIF versus open TLIF, we identified 22 patients who underwent TLIF from 2005 to 2008 within levels L4-S1 by the senior author (D.C.). Patients were subdivided into two groups according to whether they underwent: (i) MIS TLIF (10 patients, the first MIS TLIF procedures performed by D.C.); or (ii) open TLIF (12 patients). Preoperative, perioperative and postoperative factors were evaluated. Patients who underwent MIS TLIF had a statistically significant lower intraoperative transfusion rate, and rate of required postoperative surgical drains; and shorter periods of required drainage, and time to ambulation. However, the MIS TLIF group tended to have a higher rate of complications, which might have been associated with the learning curve. Both groups had a minimum of 1-year follow-up.",
keywords = "Complications, Learning curve, Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, Open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, Perioperative complications, TLIF",
author = "Darryl Lau and Lee, {Jasmine G.} and Han, {Seunggu (Jude)} and Lu, {Daniel C.} and Dean Chou",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jocn.2010.09.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "624--627",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Neuroscience",
issn = "0967-5868",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Complications and perioperative factors associated with learning the technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)

AU - Lau, Darryl

AU - Lee, Jasmine G.

AU - Han, Seunggu (Jude)

AU - Lu, Daniel C.

AU - Chou, Dean

PY - 2011/5/1

Y1 - 2011/5/1

N2 - Before the advent of minimally invasive spine surgery (MIS), open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) was performed to treat spondylosis, spondylolisthesis, and spondylolysis. Minimally invasive TLIF has recently become more popular based upon the premise that a smaller, less traumatic incision should afford better recovery and outcomes. However, the learning curve associated with this technique must be considered. To analyze the perioperative factors associated with the learning curve in patients who underwent MIS TLIF versus open TLIF, we identified 22 patients who underwent TLIF from 2005 to 2008 within levels L4-S1 by the senior author (D.C.). Patients were subdivided into two groups according to whether they underwent: (i) MIS TLIF (10 patients, the first MIS TLIF procedures performed by D.C.); or (ii) open TLIF (12 patients). Preoperative, perioperative and postoperative factors were evaluated. Patients who underwent MIS TLIF had a statistically significant lower intraoperative transfusion rate, and rate of required postoperative surgical drains; and shorter periods of required drainage, and time to ambulation. However, the MIS TLIF group tended to have a higher rate of complications, which might have been associated with the learning curve. Both groups had a minimum of 1-year follow-up.

AB - Before the advent of minimally invasive spine surgery (MIS), open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) was performed to treat spondylosis, spondylolisthesis, and spondylolysis. Minimally invasive TLIF has recently become more popular based upon the premise that a smaller, less traumatic incision should afford better recovery and outcomes. However, the learning curve associated with this technique must be considered. To analyze the perioperative factors associated with the learning curve in patients who underwent MIS TLIF versus open TLIF, we identified 22 patients who underwent TLIF from 2005 to 2008 within levels L4-S1 by the senior author (D.C.). Patients were subdivided into two groups according to whether they underwent: (i) MIS TLIF (10 patients, the first MIS TLIF procedures performed by D.C.); or (ii) open TLIF (12 patients). Preoperative, perioperative and postoperative factors were evaluated. Patients who underwent MIS TLIF had a statistically significant lower intraoperative transfusion rate, and rate of required postoperative surgical drains; and shorter periods of required drainage, and time to ambulation. However, the MIS TLIF group tended to have a higher rate of complications, which might have been associated with the learning curve. Both groups had a minimum of 1-year follow-up.

KW - Complications

KW - Learning curve

KW - Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

KW - Open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

KW - Perioperative complications

KW - TLIF

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79953232300&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79953232300&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jocn.2010.09.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jocn.2010.09.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 21349719

AN - SCOPUS:79953232300

VL - 18

SP - 624

EP - 627

JO - Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

SN - 0967-5868

IS - 5

ER -