Complementary and alternative provider use by insured patients with diabetes in Washington State

Bonnie Lind, William E. Lafferty, David E. Grembowski, Paula K. Diehr

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The authors investigated whether insurance coverage for complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) providers is associated with increased medical care use among diabetes patients. Predictors of CAM use and how CAM affects health care use and expenditures under insurance coverage were examined. Design: Claims data from two large insurers in Washington State were obtained for 2002. Types of providers used, comorbid medical conditions, number of visits, and expenditures were calculated for the study sample and compared to a nondiabetic matched group. Results: Of the 20,722 adults with diabetes, 3605 (17.4%) had one or more visits to any licensed CAM provider (mostly chiropractors). This was lower than the 20% CAM use in the comparison group. Diabetes patients who used CAM were more likely to have multiple other medical problems than CAM nonusers. CAM users had a higher average number of annual outpatient visits compared to nonusers (28 versus 16), and higher average annual expenditures ($8,736 versus $7,356); however, after adjustment for disease load and other factors, CAM use was not a significant predictor of expenditures. CAM use was <2% of the overall mean medical expenditures for diabetes patients. Quality of conventional care was similar for CAM users and nonusers. Conclusions: CAM provider usage when covered by insurance is lower among diabetes patients than in adults without diabetes and represents a small proportion of diabetes care costs. Very few CAM visits were related directly to diabetes care. CAM-using patients often have heavy disease burdens and high total expected resource use compared to those not using CAM.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)71-77
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Complementary Therapies
Health Expenditures
Insurance Coverage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Complementary and alternative medicine

Cite this

Complementary and alternative provider use by insured patients with diabetes in Washington State. / Lind, Bonnie; Lafferty, William E.; Grembowski, David E.; Diehr, Paula K.

In: Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, Vol. 12, No. 1, 01.01.2006, p. 71-77.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lind, Bonnie ; Lafferty, William E. ; Grembowski, David E. ; Diehr, Paula K. / Complementary and alternative provider use by insured patients with diabetes in Washington State. In: Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 2006 ; Vol. 12, No. 1. pp. 71-77.
@article{f46999fb5f954a9998912552f56b2b69,
title = "Complementary and alternative provider use by insured patients with diabetes in Washington State",
abstract = "Objectives: The authors investigated whether insurance coverage for complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) providers is associated with increased medical care use among diabetes patients. Predictors of CAM use and how CAM affects health care use and expenditures under insurance coverage were examined. Design: Claims data from two large insurers in Washington State were obtained for 2002. Types of providers used, comorbid medical conditions, number of visits, and expenditures were calculated for the study sample and compared to a nondiabetic matched group. Results: Of the 20,722 adults with diabetes, 3605 (17.4{\%}) had one or more visits to any licensed CAM provider (mostly chiropractors). This was lower than the 20{\%} CAM use in the comparison group. Diabetes patients who used CAM were more likely to have multiple other medical problems than CAM nonusers. CAM users had a higher average number of annual outpatient visits compared to nonusers (28 versus 16), and higher average annual expenditures ($8,736 versus $7,356); however, after adjustment for disease load and other factors, CAM use was not a significant predictor of expenditures. CAM use was <2{\%} of the overall mean medical expenditures for diabetes patients. Quality of conventional care was similar for CAM users and nonusers. Conclusions: CAM provider usage when covered by insurance is lower among diabetes patients than in adults without diabetes and represents a small proportion of diabetes care costs. Very few CAM visits were related directly to diabetes care. CAM-using patients often have heavy disease burdens and high total expected resource use compared to those not using CAM.",
author = "Bonnie Lind and Lafferty, {William E.} and Grembowski, {David E.} and Diehr, {Paula K.}",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/acm.2006.12.71",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "71--77",
journal = "Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine",
issn = "1075-5535",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Complementary and alternative provider use by insured patients with diabetes in Washington State

AU - Lind, Bonnie

AU - Lafferty, William E.

AU - Grembowski, David E.

AU - Diehr, Paula K.

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

N2 - Objectives: The authors investigated whether insurance coverage for complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) providers is associated with increased medical care use among diabetes patients. Predictors of CAM use and how CAM affects health care use and expenditures under insurance coverage were examined. Design: Claims data from two large insurers in Washington State were obtained for 2002. Types of providers used, comorbid medical conditions, number of visits, and expenditures were calculated for the study sample and compared to a nondiabetic matched group. Results: Of the 20,722 adults with diabetes, 3605 (17.4%) had one or more visits to any licensed CAM provider (mostly chiropractors). This was lower than the 20% CAM use in the comparison group. Diabetes patients who used CAM were more likely to have multiple other medical problems than CAM nonusers. CAM users had a higher average number of annual outpatient visits compared to nonusers (28 versus 16), and higher average annual expenditures ($8,736 versus $7,356); however, after adjustment for disease load and other factors, CAM use was not a significant predictor of expenditures. CAM use was <2% of the overall mean medical expenditures for diabetes patients. Quality of conventional care was similar for CAM users and nonusers. Conclusions: CAM provider usage when covered by insurance is lower among diabetes patients than in adults without diabetes and represents a small proportion of diabetes care costs. Very few CAM visits were related directly to diabetes care. CAM-using patients often have heavy disease burdens and high total expected resource use compared to those not using CAM.

AB - Objectives: The authors investigated whether insurance coverage for complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) providers is associated with increased medical care use among diabetes patients. Predictors of CAM use and how CAM affects health care use and expenditures under insurance coverage were examined. Design: Claims data from two large insurers in Washington State were obtained for 2002. Types of providers used, comorbid medical conditions, number of visits, and expenditures were calculated for the study sample and compared to a nondiabetic matched group. Results: Of the 20,722 adults with diabetes, 3605 (17.4%) had one or more visits to any licensed CAM provider (mostly chiropractors). This was lower than the 20% CAM use in the comparison group. Diabetes patients who used CAM were more likely to have multiple other medical problems than CAM nonusers. CAM users had a higher average number of annual outpatient visits compared to nonusers (28 versus 16), and higher average annual expenditures ($8,736 versus $7,356); however, after adjustment for disease load and other factors, CAM use was not a significant predictor of expenditures. CAM use was <2% of the overall mean medical expenditures for diabetes patients. Quality of conventional care was similar for CAM users and nonusers. Conclusions: CAM provider usage when covered by insurance is lower among diabetes patients than in adults without diabetes and represents a small proportion of diabetes care costs. Very few CAM visits were related directly to diabetes care. CAM-using patients often have heavy disease burdens and high total expected resource use compared to those not using CAM.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33644775725&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33644775725&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/acm.2006.12.71

DO - 10.1089/acm.2006.12.71

M3 - Article

C2 - 16494571

AN - SCOPUS:33644775725

VL - 12

SP - 71

EP - 77

JO - Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine

JF - Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine

SN - 1075-5535

IS - 1

ER -