Compassion and vigilance: Investigators' strategies to manage ethical concerns in palliative and end-of-life research

Susan E. Hickman, Juliana Cartwright, Christine A. Nelson, Kathleen Knafl

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    16 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background: Ethical concerns were identified as a potential barrier to advancing palliative and end-of-life science at the 2004 National Institutes of Health State of the Science Meeting. However, data are lacking about the nature of ethical concerns and strategies for balancing the need to advance science with human subjects protections. Methods: A qualitative case-study design was used to follow 43 end-of-life studies from proposal development through the review process and implementation. Investigators participated in semi-structured telephone interviews and provided document data regarding their experiences with grant and IRB reviews. Using constant comparative analysis within and across cases, the investigators identified commonly encountered and unique concerns and strategies for managing these concerns. Findings: Investigator strategies fell into two broad categories: 1) Recruitment and consent strategies related to subject identification and enrollment; and 2) Protocol-related strategies related to the process of data collection. These strategies shared the overarching meta-themes of compassion, as evidenced by a heightened sensitivity to the needs of the population, coupled with vigilance, as evidenced by close attention to the possible effects of study participation on the participants' well-being, clinical care, and the needs of research staff. Conclusions: Ethical concerns have led to the development of compassionate and vigilant strategies designed to balance the potential for risk of harm with the need to advance the science of palliative and end-of-life care. These strategies can be used by investigators to address ethical concerns and minimize barriers to the development of palliative and end-of-life care science.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)880-889
    Number of pages10
    JournalJournal of Palliative Medicine
    Volume15
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Aug 1 2012

    Fingerprint

    Research Personnel
    Terminal Care
    Biological Science Disciplines
    Research
    Organized Financing
    Research Ethics Committees
    National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
    Interviews
    Population

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Medicine(all)
    • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
    • Nursing(all)

    Cite this

    Compassion and vigilance : Investigators' strategies to manage ethical concerns in palliative and end-of-life research. / Hickman, Susan E.; Cartwright, Juliana; Nelson, Christine A.; Knafl, Kathleen.

    In: Journal of Palliative Medicine, Vol. 15, No. 8, 01.08.2012, p. 880-889.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{91fc19273ff9434990d4230ef4142134,
    title = "Compassion and vigilance: Investigators' strategies to manage ethical concerns in palliative and end-of-life research",
    abstract = "Background: Ethical concerns were identified as a potential barrier to advancing palliative and end-of-life science at the 2004 National Institutes of Health State of the Science Meeting. However, data are lacking about the nature of ethical concerns and strategies for balancing the need to advance science with human subjects protections. Methods: A qualitative case-study design was used to follow 43 end-of-life studies from proposal development through the review process and implementation. Investigators participated in semi-structured telephone interviews and provided document data regarding their experiences with grant and IRB reviews. Using constant comparative analysis within and across cases, the investigators identified commonly encountered and unique concerns and strategies for managing these concerns. Findings: Investigator strategies fell into two broad categories: 1) Recruitment and consent strategies related to subject identification and enrollment; and 2) Protocol-related strategies related to the process of data collection. These strategies shared the overarching meta-themes of compassion, as evidenced by a heightened sensitivity to the needs of the population, coupled with vigilance, as evidenced by close attention to the possible effects of study participation on the participants' well-being, clinical care, and the needs of research staff. Conclusions: Ethical concerns have led to the development of compassionate and vigilant strategies designed to balance the potential for risk of harm with the need to advance the science of palliative and end-of-life care. These strategies can be used by investigators to address ethical concerns and minimize barriers to the development of palliative and end-of-life care science.",
    author = "Hickman, {Susan E.} and Juliana Cartwright and Nelson, {Christine A.} and Kathleen Knafl",
    year = "2012",
    month = "8",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1089/jpm.2011.0515",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "15",
    pages = "880--889",
    journal = "Journal of Palliative Medicine",
    issn = "1096-6218",
    publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
    number = "8",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Compassion and vigilance

    T2 - Investigators' strategies to manage ethical concerns in palliative and end-of-life research

    AU - Hickman, Susan E.

    AU - Cartwright, Juliana

    AU - Nelson, Christine A.

    AU - Knafl, Kathleen

    PY - 2012/8/1

    Y1 - 2012/8/1

    N2 - Background: Ethical concerns were identified as a potential barrier to advancing palliative and end-of-life science at the 2004 National Institutes of Health State of the Science Meeting. However, data are lacking about the nature of ethical concerns and strategies for balancing the need to advance science with human subjects protections. Methods: A qualitative case-study design was used to follow 43 end-of-life studies from proposal development through the review process and implementation. Investigators participated in semi-structured telephone interviews and provided document data regarding their experiences with grant and IRB reviews. Using constant comparative analysis within and across cases, the investigators identified commonly encountered and unique concerns and strategies for managing these concerns. Findings: Investigator strategies fell into two broad categories: 1) Recruitment and consent strategies related to subject identification and enrollment; and 2) Protocol-related strategies related to the process of data collection. These strategies shared the overarching meta-themes of compassion, as evidenced by a heightened sensitivity to the needs of the population, coupled with vigilance, as evidenced by close attention to the possible effects of study participation on the participants' well-being, clinical care, and the needs of research staff. Conclusions: Ethical concerns have led to the development of compassionate and vigilant strategies designed to balance the potential for risk of harm with the need to advance the science of palliative and end-of-life care. These strategies can be used by investigators to address ethical concerns and minimize barriers to the development of palliative and end-of-life care science.

    AB - Background: Ethical concerns were identified as a potential barrier to advancing palliative and end-of-life science at the 2004 National Institutes of Health State of the Science Meeting. However, data are lacking about the nature of ethical concerns and strategies for balancing the need to advance science with human subjects protections. Methods: A qualitative case-study design was used to follow 43 end-of-life studies from proposal development through the review process and implementation. Investigators participated in semi-structured telephone interviews and provided document data regarding their experiences with grant and IRB reviews. Using constant comparative analysis within and across cases, the investigators identified commonly encountered and unique concerns and strategies for managing these concerns. Findings: Investigator strategies fell into two broad categories: 1) Recruitment and consent strategies related to subject identification and enrollment; and 2) Protocol-related strategies related to the process of data collection. These strategies shared the overarching meta-themes of compassion, as evidenced by a heightened sensitivity to the needs of the population, coupled with vigilance, as evidenced by close attention to the possible effects of study participation on the participants' well-being, clinical care, and the needs of research staff. Conclusions: Ethical concerns have led to the development of compassionate and vigilant strategies designed to balance the potential for risk of harm with the need to advance the science of palliative and end-of-life care. These strategies can be used by investigators to address ethical concerns and minimize barriers to the development of palliative and end-of-life care science.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864585236&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864585236&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1089/jpm.2011.0515

    DO - 10.1089/jpm.2011.0515

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 22731516

    AN - SCOPUS:84864585236

    VL - 15

    SP - 880

    EP - 889

    JO - Journal of Palliative Medicine

    JF - Journal of Palliative Medicine

    SN - 1096-6218

    IS - 8

    ER -