Comparison of ventricular volume and mass measurements from B- and C-scan images with the use of real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography: Studies in an in vitro model

Rosemary A. Rusk, Yoshiki Mori, Crispin H. Davies, Timothy Irvine, Antoinette Kenny, David Sahn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Real-time 3-dimensional (3D) echocardiography avoids geometric assumptions in volume analysis and permits immediate visualization in any plane without the need for cardiac or respiratory gating or computation time. This study compared the accuracy of volume and mass assessments between standard long-axis (B-scan) and short-axis (C-scan) views in a simplified but quantifiable left ventricular phantom. Methods and Results: The model comprised an inner balloon within an outer balloon separated by ultrasonographic gel. First, to mimic different chamber volumes, 12 volumes (40 to 180 mL) of water within the inner balloon were scanned with a real-time 3D system. Second, 10 volumes (80 to 170 mL) of gel were inserted between the balloons to mimic varying cardiac mass, and the gel volume space (mass) was calculated by subtracting the inner from the outer balloon volume. 'Chamber' and 'mass' measurements for both B and C scans correlated closely with the actual values (r = 0.99). However, chamber volumes from C scans were consistently less than B-scan values (mean difference from reference for C scans: -5.2 ± 1.2 mL, P <.0001; for the 2 orthogonal B scans: 0.03 ± 1.4 mL and -0.9 ± 1.5 mL, respectively, P = NS). Similarly, for gel volume measurements, B-scan results were closer to actual mass volumes (mean difference 0.3 ± 2.5 and 1.7 ± 2.9 mL) than those of C scans, which tended to underestimate (-4.5 ± 2.5 mL, P <.0001). Conclusion: Our study suggests that real-time 3D echocardiography should provide an accurate means of determining chamber volumes and cardiac mass. However, measurements performed from B-scan views may be closer to the actual values than those from C-scan views, presumably since they are less highly influenced by distortions related to lateral resolution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)910-917
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Volume13
Issue number10
StatePublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Echocardiography
Gels
Cardiac Volume
In Vitro Techniques
Water

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Comparison of ventricular volume and mass measurements from B- and C-scan images with the use of real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography : Studies in an in vitro model. / Rusk, Rosemary A.; Mori, Yoshiki; Davies, Crispin H.; Irvine, Timothy; Kenny, Antoinette; Sahn, David.

In: Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, Vol. 13, No. 10, 2000, p. 910-917.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rusk, Rosemary A. ; Mori, Yoshiki ; Davies, Crispin H. ; Irvine, Timothy ; Kenny, Antoinette ; Sahn, David. / Comparison of ventricular volume and mass measurements from B- and C-scan images with the use of real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography : Studies in an in vitro model. In: Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2000 ; Vol. 13, No. 10. pp. 910-917.
@article{d53f5b256cb44a4a920ce75e6d8f7d73,
title = "Comparison of ventricular volume and mass measurements from B- and C-scan images with the use of real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography: Studies in an in vitro model",
abstract = "Background: Real-time 3-dimensional (3D) echocardiography avoids geometric assumptions in volume analysis and permits immediate visualization in any plane without the need for cardiac or respiratory gating or computation time. This study compared the accuracy of volume and mass assessments between standard long-axis (B-scan) and short-axis (C-scan) views in a simplified but quantifiable left ventricular phantom. Methods and Results: The model comprised an inner balloon within an outer balloon separated by ultrasonographic gel. First, to mimic different chamber volumes, 12 volumes (40 to 180 mL) of water within the inner balloon were scanned with a real-time 3D system. Second, 10 volumes (80 to 170 mL) of gel were inserted between the balloons to mimic varying cardiac mass, and the gel volume space (mass) was calculated by subtracting the inner from the outer balloon volume. 'Chamber' and 'mass' measurements for both B and C scans correlated closely with the actual values (r = 0.99). However, chamber volumes from C scans were consistently less than B-scan values (mean difference from reference for C scans: -5.2 ± 1.2 mL, P <.0001; for the 2 orthogonal B scans: 0.03 ± 1.4 mL and -0.9 ± 1.5 mL, respectively, P = NS). Similarly, for gel volume measurements, B-scan results were closer to actual mass volumes (mean difference 0.3 ± 2.5 and 1.7 ± 2.9 mL) than those of C scans, which tended to underestimate (-4.5 ± 2.5 mL, P <.0001). Conclusion: Our study suggests that real-time 3D echocardiography should provide an accurate means of determining chamber volumes and cardiac mass. However, measurements performed from B-scan views may be closer to the actual values than those from C-scan views, presumably since they are less highly influenced by distortions related to lateral resolution.",
author = "Rusk, {Rosemary A.} and Yoshiki Mori and Davies, {Crispin H.} and Timothy Irvine and Antoinette Kenny and David Sahn",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "910--917",
journal = "Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography",
issn = "0894-7317",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of ventricular volume and mass measurements from B- and C-scan images with the use of real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography

T2 - Studies in an in vitro model

AU - Rusk, Rosemary A.

AU - Mori, Yoshiki

AU - Davies, Crispin H.

AU - Irvine, Timothy

AU - Kenny, Antoinette

AU - Sahn, David

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Background: Real-time 3-dimensional (3D) echocardiography avoids geometric assumptions in volume analysis and permits immediate visualization in any plane without the need for cardiac or respiratory gating or computation time. This study compared the accuracy of volume and mass assessments between standard long-axis (B-scan) and short-axis (C-scan) views in a simplified but quantifiable left ventricular phantom. Methods and Results: The model comprised an inner balloon within an outer balloon separated by ultrasonographic gel. First, to mimic different chamber volumes, 12 volumes (40 to 180 mL) of water within the inner balloon were scanned with a real-time 3D system. Second, 10 volumes (80 to 170 mL) of gel were inserted between the balloons to mimic varying cardiac mass, and the gel volume space (mass) was calculated by subtracting the inner from the outer balloon volume. 'Chamber' and 'mass' measurements for both B and C scans correlated closely with the actual values (r = 0.99). However, chamber volumes from C scans were consistently less than B-scan values (mean difference from reference for C scans: -5.2 ± 1.2 mL, P <.0001; for the 2 orthogonal B scans: 0.03 ± 1.4 mL and -0.9 ± 1.5 mL, respectively, P = NS). Similarly, for gel volume measurements, B-scan results were closer to actual mass volumes (mean difference 0.3 ± 2.5 and 1.7 ± 2.9 mL) than those of C scans, which tended to underestimate (-4.5 ± 2.5 mL, P <.0001). Conclusion: Our study suggests that real-time 3D echocardiography should provide an accurate means of determining chamber volumes and cardiac mass. However, measurements performed from B-scan views may be closer to the actual values than those from C-scan views, presumably since they are less highly influenced by distortions related to lateral resolution.

AB - Background: Real-time 3-dimensional (3D) echocardiography avoids geometric assumptions in volume analysis and permits immediate visualization in any plane without the need for cardiac or respiratory gating or computation time. This study compared the accuracy of volume and mass assessments between standard long-axis (B-scan) and short-axis (C-scan) views in a simplified but quantifiable left ventricular phantom. Methods and Results: The model comprised an inner balloon within an outer balloon separated by ultrasonographic gel. First, to mimic different chamber volumes, 12 volumes (40 to 180 mL) of water within the inner balloon were scanned with a real-time 3D system. Second, 10 volumes (80 to 170 mL) of gel were inserted between the balloons to mimic varying cardiac mass, and the gel volume space (mass) was calculated by subtracting the inner from the outer balloon volume. 'Chamber' and 'mass' measurements for both B and C scans correlated closely with the actual values (r = 0.99). However, chamber volumes from C scans were consistently less than B-scan values (mean difference from reference for C scans: -5.2 ± 1.2 mL, P <.0001; for the 2 orthogonal B scans: 0.03 ± 1.4 mL and -0.9 ± 1.5 mL, respectively, P = NS). Similarly, for gel volume measurements, B-scan results were closer to actual mass volumes (mean difference 0.3 ± 2.5 and 1.7 ± 2.9 mL) than those of C scans, which tended to underestimate (-4.5 ± 2.5 mL, P <.0001). Conclusion: Our study suggests that real-time 3D echocardiography should provide an accurate means of determining chamber volumes and cardiac mass. However, measurements performed from B-scan views may be closer to the actual values than those from C-scan views, presumably since they are less highly influenced by distortions related to lateral resolution.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033792168&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033792168&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11029715

AN - SCOPUS:0033792168

VL - 13

SP - 910

EP - 917

JO - Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography

JF - Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography

SN - 0894-7317

IS - 10

ER -