Comparison of ultrasound and implanted seed marker prostate localization methods: Implications for image-guided radiotherapy

Todd J. Scarbrough, Nanialei M. Golden, Joseph Y. Ting, Clifton D. Fuller, Adrian Wong, Patrick A. Kupelian, Charles Thomas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

122 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze two methods of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) for external beam radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Methods and Materials: The prostate was localized by ultrasound (US) in lateral (left/right), vertical (anteroposterior), and longitudinal (superior/inferior) dimensions and then by fiducial seed marker (SM) kV X-ray. Assuming initial setup to skin marks as the origin, the mean suggested shifts (for all dimensions) were hypothesized to be similar and within 1 mm of the origin. The three-dimensional distance discrepancy between suggested SM and US shift points was calculated. We hypothesized a mean discrepancy >5 mm as clinically significant. Results: From 40 patients, 1019 US/SM measurements were obtained. Lateral, vertical, and longitudinal dimensional comparisons reveal statistically significant differences in mean shifts (p <0.0001 for all). US dimensional shifts reveal significantly greater variability. The US three-dimensional vector is greater and more variable than the SM vector (p <0.0001). The mean US/SM three-dimensional distance discrepancy is 8.8 mm (significantly >5 mm, p <0.0001). Conclusions: Ultrasound and SM methods suggest different shifts. US data reveal greater systematic/random error vs. SM data. The US data suggest larger PTV expansion margins (∼9 mm) are necessary for US IGRT vs. SM IGRT (∼3 mm). The hypotheses that US and SM methods suggest similar shifts and that the mean US/SM three-dimensional distance discrepancy is ≤5 mm are rejected.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)378-387
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
Volume65
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2006

Fingerprint

Image-Guided Radiotherapy
markers
seeds
Prostate
radiation therapy
Seeds
shift
Fiducial Markers
random errors
systematic errors
margins
Prostatic Neoplasms
Radiotherapy
cancer
X-Rays
Skin
expansion

Keywords

  • External-beam radiotherapy
  • Image-guided radiotherapy
  • Prostate cancer
  • Seed marker
  • Ultrasound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiation

Cite this

Comparison of ultrasound and implanted seed marker prostate localization methods : Implications for image-guided radiotherapy. / Scarbrough, Todd J.; Golden, Nanialei M.; Ting, Joseph Y.; Fuller, Clifton D.; Wong, Adrian; Kupelian, Patrick A.; Thomas, Charles.

In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, Vol. 65, No. 2, 01.06.2006, p. 378-387.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Scarbrough, Todd J. ; Golden, Nanialei M. ; Ting, Joseph Y. ; Fuller, Clifton D. ; Wong, Adrian ; Kupelian, Patrick A. ; Thomas, Charles. / Comparison of ultrasound and implanted seed marker prostate localization methods : Implications for image-guided radiotherapy. In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. 2006 ; Vol. 65, No. 2. pp. 378-387.
@article{1482068b99a14bd2a2e60bbf273f8317,
title = "Comparison of ultrasound and implanted seed marker prostate localization methods: Implications for image-guided radiotherapy",
abstract = "Purpose: To analyze two methods of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) for external beam radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Methods and Materials: The prostate was localized by ultrasound (US) in lateral (left/right), vertical (anteroposterior), and longitudinal (superior/inferior) dimensions and then by fiducial seed marker (SM) kV X-ray. Assuming initial setup to skin marks as the origin, the mean suggested shifts (for all dimensions) were hypothesized to be similar and within 1 mm of the origin. The three-dimensional distance discrepancy between suggested SM and US shift points was calculated. We hypothesized a mean discrepancy >5 mm as clinically significant. Results: From 40 patients, 1019 US/SM measurements were obtained. Lateral, vertical, and longitudinal dimensional comparisons reveal statistically significant differences in mean shifts (p <0.0001 for all). US dimensional shifts reveal significantly greater variability. The US three-dimensional vector is greater and more variable than the SM vector (p <0.0001). The mean US/SM three-dimensional distance discrepancy is 8.8 mm (significantly >5 mm, p <0.0001). Conclusions: Ultrasound and SM methods suggest different shifts. US data reveal greater systematic/random error vs. SM data. The US data suggest larger PTV expansion margins (∼9 mm) are necessary for US IGRT vs. SM IGRT (∼3 mm). The hypotheses that US and SM methods suggest similar shifts and that the mean US/SM three-dimensional distance discrepancy is ≤5 mm are rejected.",
keywords = "External-beam radiotherapy, Image-guided radiotherapy, Prostate cancer, Seed marker, Ultrasound",
author = "Scarbrough, {Todd J.} and Golden, {Nanialei M.} and Ting, {Joseph Y.} and Fuller, {Clifton D.} and Adrian Wong and Kupelian, {Patrick A.} and Charles Thomas",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.01.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "65",
pages = "378--387",
journal = "International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics",
issn = "0360-3016",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of ultrasound and implanted seed marker prostate localization methods

T2 - Implications for image-guided radiotherapy

AU - Scarbrough, Todd J.

AU - Golden, Nanialei M.

AU - Ting, Joseph Y.

AU - Fuller, Clifton D.

AU - Wong, Adrian

AU - Kupelian, Patrick A.

AU - Thomas, Charles

PY - 2006/6/1

Y1 - 2006/6/1

N2 - Purpose: To analyze two methods of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) for external beam radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Methods and Materials: The prostate was localized by ultrasound (US) in lateral (left/right), vertical (anteroposterior), and longitudinal (superior/inferior) dimensions and then by fiducial seed marker (SM) kV X-ray. Assuming initial setup to skin marks as the origin, the mean suggested shifts (for all dimensions) were hypothesized to be similar and within 1 mm of the origin. The three-dimensional distance discrepancy between suggested SM and US shift points was calculated. We hypothesized a mean discrepancy >5 mm as clinically significant. Results: From 40 patients, 1019 US/SM measurements were obtained. Lateral, vertical, and longitudinal dimensional comparisons reveal statistically significant differences in mean shifts (p <0.0001 for all). US dimensional shifts reveal significantly greater variability. The US three-dimensional vector is greater and more variable than the SM vector (p <0.0001). The mean US/SM three-dimensional distance discrepancy is 8.8 mm (significantly >5 mm, p <0.0001). Conclusions: Ultrasound and SM methods suggest different shifts. US data reveal greater systematic/random error vs. SM data. The US data suggest larger PTV expansion margins (∼9 mm) are necessary for US IGRT vs. SM IGRT (∼3 mm). The hypotheses that US and SM methods suggest similar shifts and that the mean US/SM three-dimensional distance discrepancy is ≤5 mm are rejected.

AB - Purpose: To analyze two methods of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) for external beam radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Methods and Materials: The prostate was localized by ultrasound (US) in lateral (left/right), vertical (anteroposterior), and longitudinal (superior/inferior) dimensions and then by fiducial seed marker (SM) kV X-ray. Assuming initial setup to skin marks as the origin, the mean suggested shifts (for all dimensions) were hypothesized to be similar and within 1 mm of the origin. The three-dimensional distance discrepancy between suggested SM and US shift points was calculated. We hypothesized a mean discrepancy >5 mm as clinically significant. Results: From 40 patients, 1019 US/SM measurements were obtained. Lateral, vertical, and longitudinal dimensional comparisons reveal statistically significant differences in mean shifts (p <0.0001 for all). US dimensional shifts reveal significantly greater variability. The US three-dimensional vector is greater and more variable than the SM vector (p <0.0001). The mean US/SM three-dimensional distance discrepancy is 8.8 mm (significantly >5 mm, p <0.0001). Conclusions: Ultrasound and SM methods suggest different shifts. US data reveal greater systematic/random error vs. SM data. The US data suggest larger PTV expansion margins (∼9 mm) are necessary for US IGRT vs. SM IGRT (∼3 mm). The hypotheses that US and SM methods suggest similar shifts and that the mean US/SM three-dimensional distance discrepancy is ≤5 mm are rejected.

KW - External-beam radiotherapy

KW - Image-guided radiotherapy

KW - Prostate cancer

KW - Seed marker

KW - Ultrasound

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646266732&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646266732&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.01.008

DO - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.01.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 16563658

AN - SCOPUS:33646266732

VL - 65

SP - 378

EP - 387

JO - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

JF - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

SN - 0360-3016

IS - 2

ER -