Comparison of Tinnitus Loudness Measures: Matching, Rating, and Scaling

Candice Manning, Leslie Grush, Emily Thielman, Larry Roberts, James Henry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose Chronic tinnitus ("ringing in the ears") is a phantom auditory perception with no cure. A goal of treatment is often to reduce the loudness of tinnitus. However, tinnitus loudness cannot be measured objectively. It is most commonly assessed by obtaining a loudness match (LM) with a pure tone and by using a numeric rating scale (NRS). Constrained loudness scaling (CLS) is a more recent measure of tinnitus loudness that utilizes auditory training of a fixed loudness scale to guide tinnitus loudness judgments. The purpose of this study was to compare results using these 3 measures of tinnitus loudness. Method This study obtained tinnitus loudness measures of LM, NRS, and CLS with 170 participants. These participants are part of a larger study obtaining repeated measures over 6 months. Only baseline data are presented. Results Correlations between all measures were weak to moderate: LM versus CLS ( r = .46), CLS versus NRS ( r = .49), and LM versus NRS ( r = .38). Conclusion Further systematic research is needed to more fully understand the relationships between these different measures and to establish a valid measure of tinnitus loudness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)137-143
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican journal of audiology
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 15 2019

Fingerprint

Tinnitus
Auditory Perception
Ear
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Comparison of Tinnitus Loudness Measures : Matching, Rating, and Scaling. / Manning, Candice; Grush, Leslie; Thielman, Emily; Roberts, Larry; Henry, James.

In: American journal of audiology, Vol. 28, No. 1, 15.03.2019, p. 137-143.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Manning, Candice ; Grush, Leslie ; Thielman, Emily ; Roberts, Larry ; Henry, James. / Comparison of Tinnitus Loudness Measures : Matching, Rating, and Scaling. In: American journal of audiology. 2019 ; Vol. 28, No. 1. pp. 137-143.
@article{20cfe620166143fa948046e56ee2f01f,
title = "Comparison of Tinnitus Loudness Measures: Matching, Rating, and Scaling",
abstract = "Purpose Chronic tinnitus ({"}ringing in the ears{"}) is a phantom auditory perception with no cure. A goal of treatment is often to reduce the loudness of tinnitus. However, tinnitus loudness cannot be measured objectively. It is most commonly assessed by obtaining a loudness match (LM) with a pure tone and by using a numeric rating scale (NRS). Constrained loudness scaling (CLS) is a more recent measure of tinnitus loudness that utilizes auditory training of a fixed loudness scale to guide tinnitus loudness judgments. The purpose of this study was to compare results using these 3 measures of tinnitus loudness. Method This study obtained tinnitus loudness measures of LM, NRS, and CLS with 170 participants. These participants are part of a larger study obtaining repeated measures over 6 months. Only baseline data are presented. Results Correlations between all measures were weak to moderate: LM versus CLS ( r = .46), CLS versus NRS ( r = .49), and LM versus NRS ( r = .38). Conclusion Further systematic research is needed to more fully understand the relationships between these different measures and to establish a valid measure of tinnitus loudness.",
author = "Candice Manning and Leslie Grush and Emily Thielman and Larry Roberts and James Henry",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1044/2018_AJA-17-0115",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "137--143",
journal = "American Journal of Audiology",
issn = "1059-0889",
publisher = "American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of Tinnitus Loudness Measures

T2 - Matching, Rating, and Scaling

AU - Manning, Candice

AU - Grush, Leslie

AU - Thielman, Emily

AU - Roberts, Larry

AU - Henry, James

PY - 2019/3/15

Y1 - 2019/3/15

N2 - Purpose Chronic tinnitus ("ringing in the ears") is a phantom auditory perception with no cure. A goal of treatment is often to reduce the loudness of tinnitus. However, tinnitus loudness cannot be measured objectively. It is most commonly assessed by obtaining a loudness match (LM) with a pure tone and by using a numeric rating scale (NRS). Constrained loudness scaling (CLS) is a more recent measure of tinnitus loudness that utilizes auditory training of a fixed loudness scale to guide tinnitus loudness judgments. The purpose of this study was to compare results using these 3 measures of tinnitus loudness. Method This study obtained tinnitus loudness measures of LM, NRS, and CLS with 170 participants. These participants are part of a larger study obtaining repeated measures over 6 months. Only baseline data are presented. Results Correlations between all measures were weak to moderate: LM versus CLS ( r = .46), CLS versus NRS ( r = .49), and LM versus NRS ( r = .38). Conclusion Further systematic research is needed to more fully understand the relationships between these different measures and to establish a valid measure of tinnitus loudness.

AB - Purpose Chronic tinnitus ("ringing in the ears") is a phantom auditory perception with no cure. A goal of treatment is often to reduce the loudness of tinnitus. However, tinnitus loudness cannot be measured objectively. It is most commonly assessed by obtaining a loudness match (LM) with a pure tone and by using a numeric rating scale (NRS). Constrained loudness scaling (CLS) is a more recent measure of tinnitus loudness that utilizes auditory training of a fixed loudness scale to guide tinnitus loudness judgments. The purpose of this study was to compare results using these 3 measures of tinnitus loudness. Method This study obtained tinnitus loudness measures of LM, NRS, and CLS with 170 participants. These participants are part of a larger study obtaining repeated measures over 6 months. Only baseline data are presented. Results Correlations between all measures were weak to moderate: LM versus CLS ( r = .46), CLS versus NRS ( r = .49), and LM versus NRS ( r = .38). Conclusion Further systematic research is needed to more fully understand the relationships between these different measures and to establish a valid measure of tinnitus loudness.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064224872&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064224872&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1044/2018_AJA-17-0115

DO - 10.1044/2018_AJA-17-0115

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 137

EP - 143

JO - American Journal of Audiology

JF - American Journal of Audiology

SN - 1059-0889

IS - 1

ER -