Comparison of three techniques for calculation of target coordinates in functional stereotactic procedures

Konstantin V. Slavin, Gregory Anderson, Kim Burchiel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We compared three techniques of target coordinate determination for various functional stereotactic procedures. All procedures were based on preoperative MRI with contiguous 3-mm cuts. The first technique involved determination of anatomical landmarks and fiducial markers of the stereotactic frame on the monitor screen of an MRI scanner and calculation of the target point using a series of formulas; the second technique used a Leksell tabletop localizer, and the third technique is a part of 'Stealth' stereotactic navigation software. Final coordinates for the procedure were derived from all three techniques and subsequently adjusted using intraoperative electrical macrostimulation. We found that difference between techniques was on average 0.9 ± 0.4 mm in each of three directions, and 1.8 ± 0.9 mm in absolute distance. There were 7 cases in which one of the techniques had a discrepancy of more than 3 mm (more than 1 MRI slice thickness) compared with the other two, indicating a potential error in coordinate determination. This difference could potentially result in inappropriate placement of the electrode, thus affecting the procedure outcome. In 6 cases, such an error apparently occurred with the first or second technique of calculation. The average number of mapping trajectories decreased from 1.8 to 1.4 since this stereotactic software became a part of operative planning. We conclude that use of computerized planning software increases the precision of target coordinate calculation and improves the accuracy of functional stereotactic procedures. Copyright (C) 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)192-195
Number of pages4
JournalStereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery
Volume72
Issue number2-4
StatePublished - Apr 2000

Fingerprint

Software
Fiducial Markers
Electrodes
Direction compound

Keywords

  • Computer
  • Pallidotomy
  • Stereotactic surgery
  • Thalamotomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Comparison of three techniques for calculation of target coordinates in functional stereotactic procedures. / Slavin, Konstantin V.; Anderson, Gregory; Burchiel, Kim.

In: Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Vol. 72, No. 2-4, 04.2000, p. 192-195.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{635a4985483b42639a0e929e75f1c01c,
title = "Comparison of three techniques for calculation of target coordinates in functional stereotactic procedures",
abstract = "We compared three techniques of target coordinate determination for various functional stereotactic procedures. All procedures were based on preoperative MRI with contiguous 3-mm cuts. The first technique involved determination of anatomical landmarks and fiducial markers of the stereotactic frame on the monitor screen of an MRI scanner and calculation of the target point using a series of formulas; the second technique used a Leksell tabletop localizer, and the third technique is a part of 'Stealth' stereotactic navigation software. Final coordinates for the procedure were derived from all three techniques and subsequently adjusted using intraoperative electrical macrostimulation. We found that difference between techniques was on average 0.9 ± 0.4 mm in each of three directions, and 1.8 ± 0.9 mm in absolute distance. There were 7 cases in which one of the techniques had a discrepancy of more than 3 mm (more than 1 MRI slice thickness) compared with the other two, indicating a potential error in coordinate determination. This difference could potentially result in inappropriate placement of the electrode, thus affecting the procedure outcome. In 6 cases, such an error apparently occurred with the first or second technique of calculation. The average number of mapping trajectories decreased from 1.8 to 1.4 since this stereotactic software became a part of operative planning. We conclude that use of computerized planning software increases the precision of target coordinate calculation and improves the accuracy of functional stereotactic procedures. Copyright (C) 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel.",
keywords = "Computer, Pallidotomy, Stereotactic surgery, Thalamotomy",
author = "Slavin, {Konstantin V.} and Gregory Anderson and Kim Burchiel",
year = "2000",
month = "4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "72",
pages = "192--195",
journal = "Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery",
issn = "1011-6125",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "2-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of three techniques for calculation of target coordinates in functional stereotactic procedures

AU - Slavin, Konstantin V.

AU - Anderson, Gregory

AU - Burchiel, Kim

PY - 2000/4

Y1 - 2000/4

N2 - We compared three techniques of target coordinate determination for various functional stereotactic procedures. All procedures were based on preoperative MRI with contiguous 3-mm cuts. The first technique involved determination of anatomical landmarks and fiducial markers of the stereotactic frame on the monitor screen of an MRI scanner and calculation of the target point using a series of formulas; the second technique used a Leksell tabletop localizer, and the third technique is a part of 'Stealth' stereotactic navigation software. Final coordinates for the procedure were derived from all three techniques and subsequently adjusted using intraoperative electrical macrostimulation. We found that difference between techniques was on average 0.9 ± 0.4 mm in each of three directions, and 1.8 ± 0.9 mm in absolute distance. There were 7 cases in which one of the techniques had a discrepancy of more than 3 mm (more than 1 MRI slice thickness) compared with the other two, indicating a potential error in coordinate determination. This difference could potentially result in inappropriate placement of the electrode, thus affecting the procedure outcome. In 6 cases, such an error apparently occurred with the first or second technique of calculation. The average number of mapping trajectories decreased from 1.8 to 1.4 since this stereotactic software became a part of operative planning. We conclude that use of computerized planning software increases the precision of target coordinate calculation and improves the accuracy of functional stereotactic procedures. Copyright (C) 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel.

AB - We compared three techniques of target coordinate determination for various functional stereotactic procedures. All procedures were based on preoperative MRI with contiguous 3-mm cuts. The first technique involved determination of anatomical landmarks and fiducial markers of the stereotactic frame on the monitor screen of an MRI scanner and calculation of the target point using a series of formulas; the second technique used a Leksell tabletop localizer, and the third technique is a part of 'Stealth' stereotactic navigation software. Final coordinates for the procedure were derived from all three techniques and subsequently adjusted using intraoperative electrical macrostimulation. We found that difference between techniques was on average 0.9 ± 0.4 mm in each of three directions, and 1.8 ± 0.9 mm in absolute distance. There were 7 cases in which one of the techniques had a discrepancy of more than 3 mm (more than 1 MRI slice thickness) compared with the other two, indicating a potential error in coordinate determination. This difference could potentially result in inappropriate placement of the electrode, thus affecting the procedure outcome. In 6 cases, such an error apparently occurred with the first or second technique of calculation. The average number of mapping trajectories decreased from 1.8 to 1.4 since this stereotactic software became a part of operative planning. We conclude that use of computerized planning software increases the precision of target coordinate calculation and improves the accuracy of functional stereotactic procedures. Copyright (C) 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel.

KW - Computer

KW - Pallidotomy

KW - Stereotactic surgery

KW - Thalamotomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0342265122&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0342265122&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 72

SP - 192

EP - 195

JO - Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery

JF - Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery

SN - 1011-6125

IS - 2-4

ER -