Comparison of three methods for identifying medical drug-psychotropic drug interactions

James J. Strain, Nien Mu Chiu, Matthew Brodsky, Anwarul Karim, Gina Caliendo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Three methods for examining drug-drug interactions were compared to understand advantages and disadvantages of each: ePocrates; Interact; The Mount Sinai multiple source for the evaluation of drug-drug interactions (MS). ePocrates is a commonly employed software system utilized in a hand held computer, the PalmPilot. Interact is on a CD-ROM, and promoted by the American Psychiatric Association Press. The MS system was developed by the authors and utilizes six separate references sources to ascertain the presence and significance of drug-drug interactions. Commonly prescribed neurology and psychotropic medication interactions were compared using the three systems. ePocrates did not list the significance level of the interaction, e.g., (major, moderate, minor), often did not include a mechanism of action, and several commonly employed medications were not included. It did permit examining several drugs at the same time, and was easily carried on the person of the physician. Interact often contained old references, several drugs were not included, was not adapted to a hand held computer format, and had no update since 1999. The MS system listed level of significance, provided mechanism of action, and advice to the practitioner including recommendations. It is not portable, requiring a laptop or desk top computer or hard copy, and only searches one drug at a time. It is hoped that the advantages of each of these three systems may be incorporated into systems of the future.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)311-315
Number of pages5
JournalGeneral Hospital Psychiatry
Volume24
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Psychotropic Drugs
Drug Interactions
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Hand
CD-ROM
Drug Evaluation
Neurology
Software
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Medicine(all)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Comparison of three methods for identifying medical drug-psychotropic drug interactions. / Strain, James J.; Chiu, Nien Mu; Brodsky, Matthew; Karim, Anwarul; Caliendo, Gina.

In: General Hospital Psychiatry, Vol. 24, No. 5, 09.2002, p. 311-315.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Strain, James J. ; Chiu, Nien Mu ; Brodsky, Matthew ; Karim, Anwarul ; Caliendo, Gina. / Comparison of three methods for identifying medical drug-psychotropic drug interactions. In: General Hospital Psychiatry. 2002 ; Vol. 24, No. 5. pp. 311-315.
@article{e1daec38f81a48b6a110c45256f1b665,
title = "Comparison of three methods for identifying medical drug-psychotropic drug interactions",
abstract = "Three methods for examining drug-drug interactions were compared to understand advantages and disadvantages of each: ePocrates; Interact; The Mount Sinai multiple source for the evaluation of drug-drug interactions (MS). ePocrates is a commonly employed software system utilized in a hand held computer, the PalmPilot. Interact is on a CD-ROM, and promoted by the American Psychiatric Association Press. The MS system was developed by the authors and utilizes six separate references sources to ascertain the presence and significance of drug-drug interactions. Commonly prescribed neurology and psychotropic medication interactions were compared using the three systems. ePocrates did not list the significance level of the interaction, e.g., (major, moderate, minor), often did not include a mechanism of action, and several commonly employed medications were not included. It did permit examining several drugs at the same time, and was easily carried on the person of the physician. Interact often contained old references, several drugs were not included, was not adapted to a hand held computer format, and had no update since 1999. The MS system listed level of significance, provided mechanism of action, and advice to the practitioner including recommendations. It is not portable, requiring a laptop or desk top computer or hard copy, and only searches one drug at a time. It is hoped that the advantages of each of these three systems may be incorporated into systems of the future.",
author = "Strain, {James J.} and Chiu, {Nien Mu} and Matthew Brodsky and Anwarul Karim and Gina Caliendo",
year = "2002",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/S0163-8343(02)00196-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "311--315",
journal = "General Hospital Psychiatry",
issn = "0163-8343",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of three methods for identifying medical drug-psychotropic drug interactions

AU - Strain, James J.

AU - Chiu, Nien Mu

AU - Brodsky, Matthew

AU - Karim, Anwarul

AU - Caliendo, Gina

PY - 2002/9

Y1 - 2002/9

N2 - Three methods for examining drug-drug interactions were compared to understand advantages and disadvantages of each: ePocrates; Interact; The Mount Sinai multiple source for the evaluation of drug-drug interactions (MS). ePocrates is a commonly employed software system utilized in a hand held computer, the PalmPilot. Interact is on a CD-ROM, and promoted by the American Psychiatric Association Press. The MS system was developed by the authors and utilizes six separate references sources to ascertain the presence and significance of drug-drug interactions. Commonly prescribed neurology and psychotropic medication interactions were compared using the three systems. ePocrates did not list the significance level of the interaction, e.g., (major, moderate, minor), often did not include a mechanism of action, and several commonly employed medications were not included. It did permit examining several drugs at the same time, and was easily carried on the person of the physician. Interact often contained old references, several drugs were not included, was not adapted to a hand held computer format, and had no update since 1999. The MS system listed level of significance, provided mechanism of action, and advice to the practitioner including recommendations. It is not portable, requiring a laptop or desk top computer or hard copy, and only searches one drug at a time. It is hoped that the advantages of each of these three systems may be incorporated into systems of the future.

AB - Three methods for examining drug-drug interactions were compared to understand advantages and disadvantages of each: ePocrates; Interact; The Mount Sinai multiple source for the evaluation of drug-drug interactions (MS). ePocrates is a commonly employed software system utilized in a hand held computer, the PalmPilot. Interact is on a CD-ROM, and promoted by the American Psychiatric Association Press. The MS system was developed by the authors and utilizes six separate references sources to ascertain the presence and significance of drug-drug interactions. Commonly prescribed neurology and psychotropic medication interactions were compared using the three systems. ePocrates did not list the significance level of the interaction, e.g., (major, moderate, minor), often did not include a mechanism of action, and several commonly employed medications were not included. It did permit examining several drugs at the same time, and was easily carried on the person of the physician. Interact often contained old references, several drugs were not included, was not adapted to a hand held computer format, and had no update since 1999. The MS system listed level of significance, provided mechanism of action, and advice to the practitioner including recommendations. It is not portable, requiring a laptop or desk top computer or hard copy, and only searches one drug at a time. It is hoped that the advantages of each of these three systems may be incorporated into systems of the future.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036767742&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036767742&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0163-8343(02)00196-2

DO - 10.1016/S0163-8343(02)00196-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 12220796

AN - SCOPUS:0036767742

VL - 24

SP - 311

EP - 315

JO - General Hospital Psychiatry

JF - General Hospital Psychiatry

SN - 0163-8343

IS - 5

ER -