Comparison of techniques for quantification of fluorescence from tissue

Brian W. Pogue, Xiaodong Zhou, Summer Gibbs, Scott Davis, Dax Kepshire, Keith D. Paulsen, Tayyaba Hasan

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper summarizes ten approaches to quantifying fluorescence in tissues, and contrasts their strengths and weaknesses, relative to what their common applications are, and should be. The major issues involved in this analysis are to compare the accuracy of the method and the ability to quantify the active (i.e. non-aggregated) fraction of fluorophore in the tissue. In addition, issues of the depth of penetration and the availability of the method come into play when clinical applications are required. In general, tissue extraction and liquification methods are the 'gold standard' in this field, yet these are plagued by large variance in the values, raising questions about their ability to report on the true active fraction of drug in the tissue. Confocal and fiber optic microsampling methods allow direct quantification of the active fluorescence in vivo and are able to quantify the heterogeneity in the tissue. Yet both of these methods sample the most superficial layers of a tissue, unless invasive injection of the probe is done. Macroscopic sampling of the tissue is therefore the preferred choice for clinical use, yet there is truly no optimum method which can sample the drug concentration to arbitrary accuracy. Empirical bulk tissue sampling methods are the most commonly used, yet without model-based interpretation of the values it is generally not possible to be quantitative. Even relative uptake values can be distorted by the shape of the tissue, and so raster scanning or model-based assessment of the fluorescent yield is preferable, if available. Extending this concept further, tomographic methods can be implemented to quantify fluorescence, and can even be coupled into existing clinical imaging systems, but development and optimization of these methods will be required in the coming years. These are outlined, and case examples illustrated in this paper.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationOptical Methods for Tumor Treatment and Detection
Subtitle of host publicationMechanisms and Techniques in Photodynamic Therapy XV
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 30 2006
Externally publishedYes
EventOptical Methods for Tumor Treatment and Detection: Mechanisms and Techniques in Photodynamic Therapy XV - San Jose, CA, United States
Duration: Jan 21 2006Jan 22 2006

Publication series

NameProgress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE
Volume6139
ISSN (Print)1605-7422

Other

OtherOptical Methods for Tumor Treatment and Detection: Mechanisms and Techniques in Photodynamic Therapy XV
CountryUnited States
CitySan Jose, CA
Period1/21/061/22/06

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
  • Biomaterials
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of techniques for quantification of fluorescence from tissue'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Pogue, B. W., Zhou, X., Gibbs, S., Davis, S., Kepshire, D., Paulsen, K. D., & Hasan, T. (2006). Comparison of techniques for quantification of fluorescence from tissue. In Optical Methods for Tumor Treatment and Detection: Mechanisms and Techniques in Photodynamic Therapy XV [61390N] (Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE; Vol. 6139). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.647572