Comparison of opioid prescribing patterns in the United States and Japan: Primary care physicians' attitudes and perceptions

Eriko Onishi, Tadashi Kobayashi, Eve Dexter, Miguel Marino, Tetsuhiro Maeno, Richard A. Deyo

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

  • 4 Citations

Abstract

Introduction: Far fewer opioids are prescribed in Japan than in the United States. Methods: We conducted an online physician survey assessing attitudes and perceptions that might influence prescribing. A Japanese version was distributed to members of the Japan Primary Care Association and an English version to members of the American Academy of Family Physicians practicing in Oregon. Results: We received 461 Japanese responses and 198 from the United States, though overall response rates were low (Japan: 10.1%, United States: 18.5%). Japanese respondents reported far less opioid prescribing than US respondents, especially for acute pain (acute pain: 49.4% vs 97.0%; chronic pain: 63.7% vs 90.9%; P < .001 for both). Almost half of respondents from both countries indicated that patient expectations and satisfaction were important factors that influence prescribing. US respondents were significantly more likely to identify medical indication and legal expectation as reasons to prescribe opioids for acute pain. Most US respondents (95.4%) thought opioids were used too often, versus 6.6% of Japanese respondents. Conclusions: Lower opioid use was reported in Japan, especially for acute pain, which may help minimize long-term use. Patient expectations and satisfaction seem to influence opioid prescribing in both countries. The United States could learn from Japanese regulatory and cultural perspectives.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages248-254
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017

Fingerprint

Primary Care Physicians
Opioid Analgesics
Japan
Acute Pain
Patient Satisfaction
Family Physicians
Surveys and Questionnaires
Chronic Pain
Primary Health Care
Physicians

Keywords

  • Acute Pain
  • Chronic Pain
  • Japan
  • Opioid Analgesics
  • Opioid-Related Disorders
  • Oregon
  • Prescriptions
  • Primary Health Care
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Family Practice

Cite this

Comparison of opioid prescribing patterns in the United States and Japan : Primary care physicians' attitudes and perceptions. / Onishi, Eriko; Kobayashi, Tadashi; Dexter, Eve; Marino, Miguel; Maeno, Tetsuhiro; Deyo, Richard A.

In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, Vol. 30, No. 2, 01.03.2017, p. 248-254.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{66d0a627d6294825a3562cbbbf9e1385,
title = "Comparison of opioid prescribing patterns in the United States and Japan: Primary care physicians' attitudes and perceptions",
abstract = "Introduction: Far fewer opioids are prescribed in Japan than in the United States. Methods: We conducted an online physician survey assessing attitudes and perceptions that might influence prescribing. A Japanese version was distributed to members of the Japan Primary Care Association and an English version to members of the American Academy of Family Physicians practicing in Oregon. Results: We received 461 Japanese responses and 198 from the United States, though overall response rates were low (Japan: 10.1{\%}, United States: 18.5{\%}). Japanese respondents reported far less opioid prescribing than US respondents, especially for acute pain (acute pain: 49.4{\%} vs 97.0{\%}; chronic pain: 63.7{\%} vs 90.9{\%}; P < .001 for both). Almost half of respondents from both countries indicated that patient expectations and satisfaction were important factors that influence prescribing. US respondents were significantly more likely to identify medical indication and legal expectation as reasons to prescribe opioids for acute pain. Most US respondents (95.4{\%}) thought opioids were used too often, versus 6.6{\%} of Japanese respondents. Conclusions: Lower opioid use was reported in Japan, especially for acute pain, which may help minimize long-term use. Patient expectations and satisfaction seem to influence opioid prescribing in both countries. The United States could learn from Japanese regulatory and cultural perspectives.",
keywords = "Acute Pain, Chronic Pain, Japan, Opioid Analgesics, Opioid-Related Disorders, Oregon, Prescriptions, Primary Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires",
author = "Eriko Onishi and Tadashi Kobayashi and Eve Dexter and Miguel Marino and Tetsuhiro Maeno and Deyo, {Richard A.}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3122/jabfm.2017.02.160299",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "248--254",
journal = "Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine",
issn = "1557-2625",
publisher = "American Board of Family Medicine",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of opioid prescribing patterns in the United States and Japan

T2 - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

AU - Onishi,Eriko

AU - Kobayashi,Tadashi

AU - Dexter,Eve

AU - Marino,Miguel

AU - Maeno,Tetsuhiro

AU - Deyo,Richard A.

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Introduction: Far fewer opioids are prescribed in Japan than in the United States. Methods: We conducted an online physician survey assessing attitudes and perceptions that might influence prescribing. A Japanese version was distributed to members of the Japan Primary Care Association and an English version to members of the American Academy of Family Physicians practicing in Oregon. Results: We received 461 Japanese responses and 198 from the United States, though overall response rates were low (Japan: 10.1%, United States: 18.5%). Japanese respondents reported far less opioid prescribing than US respondents, especially for acute pain (acute pain: 49.4% vs 97.0%; chronic pain: 63.7% vs 90.9%; P < .001 for both). Almost half of respondents from both countries indicated that patient expectations and satisfaction were important factors that influence prescribing. US respondents were significantly more likely to identify medical indication and legal expectation as reasons to prescribe opioids for acute pain. Most US respondents (95.4%) thought opioids were used too often, versus 6.6% of Japanese respondents. Conclusions: Lower opioid use was reported in Japan, especially for acute pain, which may help minimize long-term use. Patient expectations and satisfaction seem to influence opioid prescribing in both countries. The United States could learn from Japanese regulatory and cultural perspectives.

AB - Introduction: Far fewer opioids are prescribed in Japan than in the United States. Methods: We conducted an online physician survey assessing attitudes and perceptions that might influence prescribing. A Japanese version was distributed to members of the Japan Primary Care Association and an English version to members of the American Academy of Family Physicians practicing in Oregon. Results: We received 461 Japanese responses and 198 from the United States, though overall response rates were low (Japan: 10.1%, United States: 18.5%). Japanese respondents reported far less opioid prescribing than US respondents, especially for acute pain (acute pain: 49.4% vs 97.0%; chronic pain: 63.7% vs 90.9%; P < .001 for both). Almost half of respondents from both countries indicated that patient expectations and satisfaction were important factors that influence prescribing. US respondents were significantly more likely to identify medical indication and legal expectation as reasons to prescribe opioids for acute pain. Most US respondents (95.4%) thought opioids were used too often, versus 6.6% of Japanese respondents. Conclusions: Lower opioid use was reported in Japan, especially for acute pain, which may help minimize long-term use. Patient expectations and satisfaction seem to influence opioid prescribing in both countries. The United States could learn from Japanese regulatory and cultural perspectives.

KW - Acute Pain

KW - Chronic Pain

KW - Japan

KW - Opioid Analgesics

KW - Opioid-Related Disorders

KW - Oregon

KW - Prescriptions

KW - Primary Health Care

KW - Surveys and Questionnaires

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016618830&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016618830&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3122/jabfm.2017.02.160299

DO - 10.3122/jabfm.2017.02.160299

M3 - Review article

VL - 30

SP - 248

EP - 254

JO - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

JF - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

SN - 1557-2625

IS - 2

ER -