Comparison of open versus endoscopic resection of inverted papilloma

Nathan Sautter, Steven B. Cannady, Martin J. Citardi, Hwan Jung Roh, Pete S. Batra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Lateral rhinotomy with medial maxillectomy has served as the standard for surgical management of inverted papilloma (IP) in the pre-endoscopic era; since the late 1980s, endoscopic techniques have emerged as the minimally invasive alternative. The objective of this study was twofold: (1) to compare operative parameters, complications, and recurrence rates and (2) predictive factors for recurrence for open versus endoscopic cases of IP resection. Methods: Retrospective data analysis was performed on 68 patients with histopathologically confirmed IP treated at a tertiary care medical center from January 1983 to May 2005. Parameters for comparison included operative time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), length of hospital stay (HS), complications, and recurrence rate. Predictive factors for recurrence including open versus endoscopic cases, primary versus secondary IP, and tumor by Krouse stage were analyzed. Results: The average age at time of presentation was 57.4 years with a male/female ratio of 2.2:1. Forty-nine patients underwent endoscopic resection, 13 patients underwent open resection, and 6 patients underwent limited open resection. Average OT and EBL were statistically similar for the three groups, whereas the average HS was statistically shorter (p = 0.002) for the endoscopic group. Biopsy-proven recurrence was noted in 11 (22%) endoscopic cases, 5 (39%) open cases, and 3 (50%) limited open cases. After reresection, all patients were free of disease. Mean follow-up was 16 months, 56 months, and 69 months for the endoscopic, open, and limited open groups, respectively. Analysis of predictive factors indicated that the surgical approach and primary versus secondary IP, regardless of approach, did not statistically impact recurrence rate. Chi-square analysis illustrated that patients with advanced-stage IP had a higher risk of recurrence (p = 0.002), regardless of surgical technique. Conclusion: In this series, endoscopic resection of IP was associated with shorter HS and equivalent EBL and OT compared with the open groups. The overall recurrence rate was lower in the endoscopic group ivith acceptable morbidity compared with the open and limited open groups. Thus, the endoscopic approach may serve as a superior alternative to the open approaches for successful extirpation of IP.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)320-323
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Rhinology
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Inverted Papilloma
Recurrence
Length of Stay
Operative Time
Tertiary Care Centers
Statistical Factor Analysis
Morbidity
Biopsy

Keywords

  • Endoscopic sinus surgery
  • Inverted papilloma
  • Outcomes
  • Recurrence rate
  • Sinonasal tumors
  • Surgical technique

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Sautter, N., Cannady, S. B., Citardi, M. J., Roh, H. J., & Batra, P. S. (2007). Comparison of open versus endoscopic resection of inverted papilloma. American Journal of Rhinology, 21(3), 320-323. https://doi.org/10.2500/ajr.2007.21.3020

Comparison of open versus endoscopic resection of inverted papilloma. / Sautter, Nathan; Cannady, Steven B.; Citardi, Martin J.; Roh, Hwan Jung; Batra, Pete S.

In: American Journal of Rhinology, Vol. 21, No. 3, 05.2007, p. 320-323.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sautter, N, Cannady, SB, Citardi, MJ, Roh, HJ & Batra, PS 2007, 'Comparison of open versus endoscopic resection of inverted papilloma', American Journal of Rhinology, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 320-323. https://doi.org/10.2500/ajr.2007.21.3020
Sautter, Nathan ; Cannady, Steven B. ; Citardi, Martin J. ; Roh, Hwan Jung ; Batra, Pete S. / Comparison of open versus endoscopic resection of inverted papilloma. In: American Journal of Rhinology. 2007 ; Vol. 21, No. 3. pp. 320-323.
@article{7f9465cf8fb145cb807038c9d0cd936b,
title = "Comparison of open versus endoscopic resection of inverted papilloma",
abstract = "Background: Lateral rhinotomy with medial maxillectomy has served as the standard for surgical management of inverted papilloma (IP) in the pre-endoscopic era; since the late 1980s, endoscopic techniques have emerged as the minimally invasive alternative. The objective of this study was twofold: (1) to compare operative parameters, complications, and recurrence rates and (2) predictive factors for recurrence for open versus endoscopic cases of IP resection. Methods: Retrospective data analysis was performed on 68 patients with histopathologically confirmed IP treated at a tertiary care medical center from January 1983 to May 2005. Parameters for comparison included operative time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), length of hospital stay (HS), complications, and recurrence rate. Predictive factors for recurrence including open versus endoscopic cases, primary versus secondary IP, and tumor by Krouse stage were analyzed. Results: The average age at time of presentation was 57.4 years with a male/female ratio of 2.2:1. Forty-nine patients underwent endoscopic resection, 13 patients underwent open resection, and 6 patients underwent limited open resection. Average OT and EBL were statistically similar for the three groups, whereas the average HS was statistically shorter (p = 0.002) for the endoscopic group. Biopsy-proven recurrence was noted in 11 (22{\%}) endoscopic cases, 5 (39{\%}) open cases, and 3 (50{\%}) limited open cases. After reresection, all patients were free of disease. Mean follow-up was 16 months, 56 months, and 69 months for the endoscopic, open, and limited open groups, respectively. Analysis of predictive factors indicated that the surgical approach and primary versus secondary IP, regardless of approach, did not statistically impact recurrence rate. Chi-square analysis illustrated that patients with advanced-stage IP had a higher risk of recurrence (p = 0.002), regardless of surgical technique. Conclusion: In this series, endoscopic resection of IP was associated with shorter HS and equivalent EBL and OT compared with the open groups. The overall recurrence rate was lower in the endoscopic group ivith acceptable morbidity compared with the open and limited open groups. Thus, the endoscopic approach may serve as a superior alternative to the open approaches for successful extirpation of IP.",
keywords = "Endoscopic sinus surgery, Inverted papilloma, Outcomes, Recurrence rate, Sinonasal tumors, Surgical technique",
author = "Nathan Sautter and Cannady, {Steven B.} and Citardi, {Martin J.} and Roh, {Hwan Jung} and Batra, {Pete S.}",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
doi = "10.2500/ajr.2007.21.3020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "320--323",
journal = "American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy",
issn = "1945-8924",
publisher = "OceanSide Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of open versus endoscopic resection of inverted papilloma

AU - Sautter, Nathan

AU - Cannady, Steven B.

AU - Citardi, Martin J.

AU - Roh, Hwan Jung

AU - Batra, Pete S.

PY - 2007/5

Y1 - 2007/5

N2 - Background: Lateral rhinotomy with medial maxillectomy has served as the standard for surgical management of inverted papilloma (IP) in the pre-endoscopic era; since the late 1980s, endoscopic techniques have emerged as the minimally invasive alternative. The objective of this study was twofold: (1) to compare operative parameters, complications, and recurrence rates and (2) predictive factors for recurrence for open versus endoscopic cases of IP resection. Methods: Retrospective data analysis was performed on 68 patients with histopathologically confirmed IP treated at a tertiary care medical center from January 1983 to May 2005. Parameters for comparison included operative time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), length of hospital stay (HS), complications, and recurrence rate. Predictive factors for recurrence including open versus endoscopic cases, primary versus secondary IP, and tumor by Krouse stage were analyzed. Results: The average age at time of presentation was 57.4 years with a male/female ratio of 2.2:1. Forty-nine patients underwent endoscopic resection, 13 patients underwent open resection, and 6 patients underwent limited open resection. Average OT and EBL were statistically similar for the three groups, whereas the average HS was statistically shorter (p = 0.002) for the endoscopic group. Biopsy-proven recurrence was noted in 11 (22%) endoscopic cases, 5 (39%) open cases, and 3 (50%) limited open cases. After reresection, all patients were free of disease. Mean follow-up was 16 months, 56 months, and 69 months for the endoscopic, open, and limited open groups, respectively. Analysis of predictive factors indicated that the surgical approach and primary versus secondary IP, regardless of approach, did not statistically impact recurrence rate. Chi-square analysis illustrated that patients with advanced-stage IP had a higher risk of recurrence (p = 0.002), regardless of surgical technique. Conclusion: In this series, endoscopic resection of IP was associated with shorter HS and equivalent EBL and OT compared with the open groups. The overall recurrence rate was lower in the endoscopic group ivith acceptable morbidity compared with the open and limited open groups. Thus, the endoscopic approach may serve as a superior alternative to the open approaches for successful extirpation of IP.

AB - Background: Lateral rhinotomy with medial maxillectomy has served as the standard for surgical management of inverted papilloma (IP) in the pre-endoscopic era; since the late 1980s, endoscopic techniques have emerged as the minimally invasive alternative. The objective of this study was twofold: (1) to compare operative parameters, complications, and recurrence rates and (2) predictive factors for recurrence for open versus endoscopic cases of IP resection. Methods: Retrospective data analysis was performed on 68 patients with histopathologically confirmed IP treated at a tertiary care medical center from January 1983 to May 2005. Parameters for comparison included operative time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), length of hospital stay (HS), complications, and recurrence rate. Predictive factors for recurrence including open versus endoscopic cases, primary versus secondary IP, and tumor by Krouse stage were analyzed. Results: The average age at time of presentation was 57.4 years with a male/female ratio of 2.2:1. Forty-nine patients underwent endoscopic resection, 13 patients underwent open resection, and 6 patients underwent limited open resection. Average OT and EBL were statistically similar for the three groups, whereas the average HS was statistically shorter (p = 0.002) for the endoscopic group. Biopsy-proven recurrence was noted in 11 (22%) endoscopic cases, 5 (39%) open cases, and 3 (50%) limited open cases. After reresection, all patients were free of disease. Mean follow-up was 16 months, 56 months, and 69 months for the endoscopic, open, and limited open groups, respectively. Analysis of predictive factors indicated that the surgical approach and primary versus secondary IP, regardless of approach, did not statistically impact recurrence rate. Chi-square analysis illustrated that patients with advanced-stage IP had a higher risk of recurrence (p = 0.002), regardless of surgical technique. Conclusion: In this series, endoscopic resection of IP was associated with shorter HS and equivalent EBL and OT compared with the open groups. The overall recurrence rate was lower in the endoscopic group ivith acceptable morbidity compared with the open and limited open groups. Thus, the endoscopic approach may serve as a superior alternative to the open approaches for successful extirpation of IP.

KW - Endoscopic sinus surgery

KW - Inverted papilloma

KW - Outcomes

KW - Recurrence rate

KW - Sinonasal tumors

KW - Surgical technique

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250852333&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250852333&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2500/ajr.2007.21.3020

DO - 10.2500/ajr.2007.21.3020

M3 - Article

C2 - 17621817

AN - SCOPUS:34250852333

VL - 21

SP - 320

EP - 323

JO - American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy

JF - American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy

SN - 1945-8924

IS - 3

ER -