Comparison of measurement properties of three shortened versions of the balance evaluation system test (BESTest) in people with subacute stroke

Thitimard Winairuk, Marco Y.C. Pang, Vitoon Saengsirisuwan, Fay B. Horak, Rumpa Boonsinsukh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the reliability, validity and responsiveness of 3 different short versions of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest: SBESTest, Brief-BESTest and Mini-BESTest) in patients with subacute stroke. Design: A prospective cohort study. Participants: Patients with subacute stroke. Methods: Patients were assessed using the full BESTest. Scores of 3 short-form BESTests were later extracted. The intra-rater and inter-rater reliability (n = 12) were gathered from 5 raters. Concurrent validity was assessed with the Berg Balance Scale (BBS). Floor/ceiling effect, internal responsiveness and external responsiveness with the BBS (n = 70) were assessed at baseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks post-rehabilitation. Results and conclusion: All short-form BESTests demonstrated excellent intra-rater and inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.95-0.99) and excellent concurrent validity (r = 0.93-0.96). Unlike the Brief-BESTest and Mini-BESTest, the S-BESTest and BESTest had no significant foor/ceiling effects (< 20%). The standardized response mean of all 4 BESTest versions were large, ranging between 1.19 and 1.57, indicating sufficient internal responsiveness. The area under the curve of the S-BESTest and BESTest were significantly higher than the Brief-BESTest and Mini-BESTest, reflecting better accuracy of the S-BESTest and BESTest in identifying patients with subacute stroke who had balance improvement using the minimal clinically important difference of 6 and 16 points, respectively. These findings suggest that the S-BESTest is a short-form BESTest that is appropriate for assessing balance impairments in patients with subacute stroke.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)683-691
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Volume51
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Stroke
Reproducibility of Results
Area Under Curve
Cohort Studies
Rehabilitation
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • Cerebrovascular disease
  • Minimal clinically important difference
  • Patient-reported outcome measures
  • Physical therapist
  • Postural balance
  • Psychometric

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Comparison of measurement properties of three shortened versions of the balance evaluation system test (BESTest) in people with subacute stroke. / Winairuk, Thitimard; Pang, Marco Y.C.; Saengsirisuwan, Vitoon; Horak, Fay B.; Boonsinsukh, Rumpa.

In: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol. 51, No. 9, 01.01.2019, p. 683-691.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Winairuk, Thitimard ; Pang, Marco Y.C. ; Saengsirisuwan, Vitoon ; Horak, Fay B. ; Boonsinsukh, Rumpa. / Comparison of measurement properties of three shortened versions of the balance evaluation system test (BESTest) in people with subacute stroke. In: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2019 ; Vol. 51, No. 9. pp. 683-691.
@article{8b99a004b4654a9db0d631a5cf072cc3,
title = "Comparison of measurement properties of three shortened versions of the balance evaluation system test (BESTest) in people with subacute stroke",
abstract = "Objectives: To examine the reliability, validity and responsiveness of 3 different short versions of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest: SBESTest, Brief-BESTest and Mini-BESTest) in patients with subacute stroke. Design: A prospective cohort study. Participants: Patients with subacute stroke. Methods: Patients were assessed using the full BESTest. Scores of 3 short-form BESTests were later extracted. The intra-rater and inter-rater reliability (n = 12) were gathered from 5 raters. Concurrent validity was assessed with the Berg Balance Scale (BBS). Floor/ceiling effect, internal responsiveness and external responsiveness with the BBS (n = 70) were assessed at baseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks post-rehabilitation. Results and conclusion: All short-form BESTests demonstrated excellent intra-rater and inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.95-0.99) and excellent concurrent validity (r = 0.93-0.96). Unlike the Brief-BESTest and Mini-BESTest, the S-BESTest and BESTest had no significant foor/ceiling effects (< 20{\%}). The standardized response mean of all 4 BESTest versions were large, ranging between 1.19 and 1.57, indicating sufficient internal responsiveness. The area under the curve of the S-BESTest and BESTest were significantly higher than the Brief-BESTest and Mini-BESTest, reflecting better accuracy of the S-BESTest and BESTest in identifying patients with subacute stroke who had balance improvement using the minimal clinically important difference of 6 and 16 points, respectively. These findings suggest that the S-BESTest is a short-form BESTest that is appropriate for assessing balance impairments in patients with subacute stroke.",
keywords = "Cerebrovascular disease, Minimal clinically important difference, Patient-reported outcome measures, Physical therapist, Postural balance, Psychometric",
author = "Thitimard Winairuk and Pang, {Marco Y.C.} and Vitoon Saengsirisuwan and Horak, {Fay B.} and Rumpa Boonsinsukh",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2340/16501977-2589",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "683--691",
journal = "Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine",
issn = "1650-1977",
publisher = "Foundation for Rehabilitation Information",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of measurement properties of three shortened versions of the balance evaluation system test (BESTest) in people with subacute stroke

AU - Winairuk, Thitimard

AU - Pang, Marco Y.C.

AU - Saengsirisuwan, Vitoon

AU - Horak, Fay B.

AU - Boonsinsukh, Rumpa

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objectives: To examine the reliability, validity and responsiveness of 3 different short versions of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest: SBESTest, Brief-BESTest and Mini-BESTest) in patients with subacute stroke. Design: A prospective cohort study. Participants: Patients with subacute stroke. Methods: Patients were assessed using the full BESTest. Scores of 3 short-form BESTests were later extracted. The intra-rater and inter-rater reliability (n = 12) were gathered from 5 raters. Concurrent validity was assessed with the Berg Balance Scale (BBS). Floor/ceiling effect, internal responsiveness and external responsiveness with the BBS (n = 70) were assessed at baseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks post-rehabilitation. Results and conclusion: All short-form BESTests demonstrated excellent intra-rater and inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.95-0.99) and excellent concurrent validity (r = 0.93-0.96). Unlike the Brief-BESTest and Mini-BESTest, the S-BESTest and BESTest had no significant foor/ceiling effects (< 20%). The standardized response mean of all 4 BESTest versions were large, ranging between 1.19 and 1.57, indicating sufficient internal responsiveness. The area under the curve of the S-BESTest and BESTest were significantly higher than the Brief-BESTest and Mini-BESTest, reflecting better accuracy of the S-BESTest and BESTest in identifying patients with subacute stroke who had balance improvement using the minimal clinically important difference of 6 and 16 points, respectively. These findings suggest that the S-BESTest is a short-form BESTest that is appropriate for assessing balance impairments in patients with subacute stroke.

AB - Objectives: To examine the reliability, validity and responsiveness of 3 different short versions of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest: SBESTest, Brief-BESTest and Mini-BESTest) in patients with subacute stroke. Design: A prospective cohort study. Participants: Patients with subacute stroke. Methods: Patients were assessed using the full BESTest. Scores of 3 short-form BESTests were later extracted. The intra-rater and inter-rater reliability (n = 12) were gathered from 5 raters. Concurrent validity was assessed with the Berg Balance Scale (BBS). Floor/ceiling effect, internal responsiveness and external responsiveness with the BBS (n = 70) were assessed at baseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks post-rehabilitation. Results and conclusion: All short-form BESTests demonstrated excellent intra-rater and inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.95-0.99) and excellent concurrent validity (r = 0.93-0.96). Unlike the Brief-BESTest and Mini-BESTest, the S-BESTest and BESTest had no significant foor/ceiling effects (< 20%). The standardized response mean of all 4 BESTest versions were large, ranging between 1.19 and 1.57, indicating sufficient internal responsiveness. The area under the curve of the S-BESTest and BESTest were significantly higher than the Brief-BESTest and Mini-BESTest, reflecting better accuracy of the S-BESTest and BESTest in identifying patients with subacute stroke who had balance improvement using the minimal clinically important difference of 6 and 16 points, respectively. These findings suggest that the S-BESTest is a short-form BESTest that is appropriate for assessing balance impairments in patients with subacute stroke.

KW - Cerebrovascular disease

KW - Minimal clinically important difference

KW - Patient-reported outcome measures

KW - Physical therapist

KW - Postural balance

KW - Psychometric

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072943456&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072943456&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2340/16501977-2589

DO - 10.2340/16501977-2589

M3 - Article

C2 - 31448806

AN - SCOPUS:85072943456

VL - 51

SP - 683

EP - 691

JO - Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

JF - Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

SN - 1650-1977

IS - 9

ER -