Comparison of mailed vs. on-site emergency department patient satisfaction surveys

Lalena Yarris, Rongwei (Rochelle) Fu, Rebecca Duby, Brooke Frakes, Heather Brooks, Robert Norton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Patient satisfaction is one measure of the quality of emergency department (ED) care. The impact of survey delivery method on patient satisfaction in the ED remains unknown.

Objective We hypothesized that self-administered surveys in the ED would yield a higher response rate and different satisfaction compared to mailed surveys.

Methods This observational study was conducted during a 2-month period in an urban, tertiary-care, university-based ED. Eligible patients were randomized to either complete an on-site satisfaction survey in the ED at discharge or to complete an identical survey mailed 1 week after discharge. The primary outcome was the reported overall satisfaction of on-site vs. mail-out surveys. Satisfaction was measured using Likert-type scales and dichotomized outcomes were compared using a χ2 test and logistic regression.

Results Two hundred and forty-two of 457 eligible patients randomized to the on-site group and 275 of 1152 patients in the mail-out group completed a survey (53% vs. 24%; p <0.001). Compared with the mail-out group, on-site subjects reported higher overall satisfaction (79.6% vs. 68.9%; p = 0.006), significantly higher satisfaction with their nurses' (p <0.001) and doctors' listening skills (p <0.001), and were more likely to recommend this ED to friends or family (71.4%, vs. 56.6%; p = 0.001).

Conclusions We found that patients who completed satisfaction surveys in the ED reported higher satisfaction than those who received mailed surveys. In addition, measuring patient satisfaction by self-administered on-site surveys at the time of discharge from the ED yields a significantly higher response rate than measuring satisfaction using mailed surveys.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)702-709
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Emergency Medicine
Volume47
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2014

Fingerprint

Patient Satisfaction
Hospital Emergency Service
Postal Service
Surveys and Questionnaires
Emergency Medical Services
Tertiary Healthcare
Observational Studies
Logistic Models
Nurses

Keywords

  • emergency department
  • emergency medicine
  • patient satisfaction
  • satisfaction scores

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Comparison of mailed vs. on-site emergency department patient satisfaction surveys. / Yarris, Lalena; Fu, Rongwei (Rochelle); Duby, Rebecca; Frakes, Brooke; Brooks, Heather; Norton, Robert.

In: Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 47, No. 6, 01.12.2014, p. 702-709.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yarris, Lalena ; Fu, Rongwei (Rochelle) ; Duby, Rebecca ; Frakes, Brooke ; Brooks, Heather ; Norton, Robert. / Comparison of mailed vs. on-site emergency department patient satisfaction surveys. In: Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2014 ; Vol. 47, No. 6. pp. 702-709.
@article{b65bbad80727441397d012f7223bc62f,
title = "Comparison of mailed vs. on-site emergency department patient satisfaction surveys",
abstract = "Background Patient satisfaction is one measure of the quality of emergency department (ED) care. The impact of survey delivery method on patient satisfaction in the ED remains unknown.Objective We hypothesized that self-administered surveys in the ED would yield a higher response rate and different satisfaction compared to mailed surveys.Methods This observational study was conducted during a 2-month period in an urban, tertiary-care, university-based ED. Eligible patients were randomized to either complete an on-site satisfaction survey in the ED at discharge or to complete an identical survey mailed 1 week after discharge. The primary outcome was the reported overall satisfaction of on-site vs. mail-out surveys. Satisfaction was measured using Likert-type scales and dichotomized outcomes were compared using a χ2 test and logistic regression.Results Two hundred and forty-two of 457 eligible patients randomized to the on-site group and 275 of 1152 patients in the mail-out group completed a survey (53{\%} vs. 24{\%}; p <0.001). Compared with the mail-out group, on-site subjects reported higher overall satisfaction (79.6{\%} vs. 68.9{\%}; p = 0.006), significantly higher satisfaction with their nurses' (p <0.001) and doctors' listening skills (p <0.001), and were more likely to recommend this ED to friends or family (71.4{\%}, vs. 56.6{\%}; p = 0.001).Conclusions We found that patients who completed satisfaction surveys in the ED reported higher satisfaction than those who received mailed surveys. In addition, measuring patient satisfaction by self-administered on-site surveys at the time of discharge from the ED yields a significantly higher response rate than measuring satisfaction using mailed surveys.",
keywords = "emergency department, emergency medicine, patient satisfaction, satisfaction scores",
author = "Lalena Yarris and Fu, {Rongwei (Rochelle)} and Rebecca Duby and Brooke Frakes and Heather Brooks and Robert Norton",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.06.057",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "702--709",
journal = "Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0736-4679",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of mailed vs. on-site emergency department patient satisfaction surveys

AU - Yarris, Lalena

AU - Fu, Rongwei (Rochelle)

AU - Duby, Rebecca

AU - Frakes, Brooke

AU - Brooks, Heather

AU - Norton, Robert

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - Background Patient satisfaction is one measure of the quality of emergency department (ED) care. The impact of survey delivery method on patient satisfaction in the ED remains unknown.Objective We hypothesized that self-administered surveys in the ED would yield a higher response rate and different satisfaction compared to mailed surveys.Methods This observational study was conducted during a 2-month period in an urban, tertiary-care, university-based ED. Eligible patients were randomized to either complete an on-site satisfaction survey in the ED at discharge or to complete an identical survey mailed 1 week after discharge. The primary outcome was the reported overall satisfaction of on-site vs. mail-out surveys. Satisfaction was measured using Likert-type scales and dichotomized outcomes were compared using a χ2 test and logistic regression.Results Two hundred and forty-two of 457 eligible patients randomized to the on-site group and 275 of 1152 patients in the mail-out group completed a survey (53% vs. 24%; p <0.001). Compared with the mail-out group, on-site subjects reported higher overall satisfaction (79.6% vs. 68.9%; p = 0.006), significantly higher satisfaction with their nurses' (p <0.001) and doctors' listening skills (p <0.001), and were more likely to recommend this ED to friends or family (71.4%, vs. 56.6%; p = 0.001).Conclusions We found that patients who completed satisfaction surveys in the ED reported higher satisfaction than those who received mailed surveys. In addition, measuring patient satisfaction by self-administered on-site surveys at the time of discharge from the ED yields a significantly higher response rate than measuring satisfaction using mailed surveys.

AB - Background Patient satisfaction is one measure of the quality of emergency department (ED) care. The impact of survey delivery method on patient satisfaction in the ED remains unknown.Objective We hypothesized that self-administered surveys in the ED would yield a higher response rate and different satisfaction compared to mailed surveys.Methods This observational study was conducted during a 2-month period in an urban, tertiary-care, university-based ED. Eligible patients were randomized to either complete an on-site satisfaction survey in the ED at discharge or to complete an identical survey mailed 1 week after discharge. The primary outcome was the reported overall satisfaction of on-site vs. mail-out surveys. Satisfaction was measured using Likert-type scales and dichotomized outcomes were compared using a χ2 test and logistic regression.Results Two hundred and forty-two of 457 eligible patients randomized to the on-site group and 275 of 1152 patients in the mail-out group completed a survey (53% vs. 24%; p <0.001). Compared with the mail-out group, on-site subjects reported higher overall satisfaction (79.6% vs. 68.9%; p = 0.006), significantly higher satisfaction with their nurses' (p <0.001) and doctors' listening skills (p <0.001), and were more likely to recommend this ED to friends or family (71.4%, vs. 56.6%; p = 0.001).Conclusions We found that patients who completed satisfaction surveys in the ED reported higher satisfaction than those who received mailed surveys. In addition, measuring patient satisfaction by self-administered on-site surveys at the time of discharge from the ED yields a significantly higher response rate than measuring satisfaction using mailed surveys.

KW - emergency department

KW - emergency medicine

KW - patient satisfaction

KW - satisfaction scores

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84916881222&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84916881222&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.06.057

DO - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.06.057

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 702

EP - 709

JO - Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0736-4679

IS - 6

ER -