Comparison of left and right atrial volume by echocardiography versus cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using the area-length method

Matthew Whitlock, Anuj Garg, Jill Gelow, Timothy Jacobson, Craig Broberg

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    56 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Increased atrial volumes predict adverse cardiovascular events. Accordingly, accurate measurement of atrial size has become increasingly important in clinical practice. The area-length method is commonly used to estimate the volume. Disagreements between atrial volumes using echocardiography and other imaging modalities have been found. It is unclear whether this has resulted from differences in the measurement method or discrepancies among imaging modalities. We compared the right atrial (RA) and left atrial (LA) volume estimates using the area-length method for transthoracic echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. Patients undergoing echocardiography and CMR imaging within 1 month were identified retrospectively. For both modalities, the RA and LA long-axis dimension and area were measured using standard 2- and 4-chamber views, and the volume was calculated using the area-length method for both atria. The echocardiographic and CMR values were compared using the Bland-Altman method. A total of 85 patients and 18 controls were included in the present study. The atrial volumes estimated using the area-length method were significantly smaller when measured using echocardiography than when measured using CMR imaging (LA volume 35 ± 20 vs 49 ± 30 ml/m 2, p 2, p = 0.012). The mean difference (CMR imaging minus echocardiography) was 14 ± 14 ml/m 2 for the LA and 10 ± 16 ml/m 2 for the RA volume. Similar results were found in the healthy controls. No significant intra- or interobserver variability was found within each modality. In conclusion, echocardiography consistently underestimated the atrial volumes compared to CMR imaging using the area-length method.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1345-1350
    Number of pages6
    JournalAmerican Journal of Cardiology
    Volume106
    Issue number9
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Nov 1 2010

    Fingerprint

    Echocardiography
    Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Observer Variation
    Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

    Cite this

    Comparison of left and right atrial volume by echocardiography versus cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using the area-length method. / Whitlock, Matthew; Garg, Anuj; Gelow, Jill; Jacobson, Timothy; Broberg, Craig.

    In: American Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 106, No. 9, 01.11.2010, p. 1345-1350.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{dc51157c067e48ea824e200319d29390,
    title = "Comparison of left and right atrial volume by echocardiography versus cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using the area-length method",
    abstract = "Increased atrial volumes predict adverse cardiovascular events. Accordingly, accurate measurement of atrial size has become increasingly important in clinical practice. The area-length method is commonly used to estimate the volume. Disagreements between atrial volumes using echocardiography and other imaging modalities have been found. It is unclear whether this has resulted from differences in the measurement method or discrepancies among imaging modalities. We compared the right atrial (RA) and left atrial (LA) volume estimates using the area-length method for transthoracic echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. Patients undergoing echocardiography and CMR imaging within 1 month were identified retrospectively. For both modalities, the RA and LA long-axis dimension and area were measured using standard 2- and 4-chamber views, and the volume was calculated using the area-length method for both atria. The echocardiographic and CMR values were compared using the Bland-Altman method. A total of 85 patients and 18 controls were included in the present study. The atrial volumes estimated using the area-length method were significantly smaller when measured using echocardiography than when measured using CMR imaging (LA volume 35 ± 20 vs 49 ± 30 ml/m 2, p 2, p = 0.012). The mean difference (CMR imaging minus echocardiography) was 14 ± 14 ml/m 2 for the LA and 10 ± 16 ml/m 2 for the RA volume. Similar results were found in the healthy controls. No significant intra- or interobserver variability was found within each modality. In conclusion, echocardiography consistently underestimated the atrial volumes compared to CMR imaging using the area-length method.",
    author = "Matthew Whitlock and Anuj Garg and Jill Gelow and Timothy Jacobson and Craig Broberg",
    year = "2010",
    month = "11",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.06.065",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "106",
    pages = "1345--1350",
    journal = "American Journal of Cardiology",
    issn = "0002-9149",
    publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
    number = "9",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Comparison of left and right atrial volume by echocardiography versus cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using the area-length method

    AU - Whitlock, Matthew

    AU - Garg, Anuj

    AU - Gelow, Jill

    AU - Jacobson, Timothy

    AU - Broberg, Craig

    PY - 2010/11/1

    Y1 - 2010/11/1

    N2 - Increased atrial volumes predict adverse cardiovascular events. Accordingly, accurate measurement of atrial size has become increasingly important in clinical practice. The area-length method is commonly used to estimate the volume. Disagreements between atrial volumes using echocardiography and other imaging modalities have been found. It is unclear whether this has resulted from differences in the measurement method or discrepancies among imaging modalities. We compared the right atrial (RA) and left atrial (LA) volume estimates using the area-length method for transthoracic echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. Patients undergoing echocardiography and CMR imaging within 1 month were identified retrospectively. For both modalities, the RA and LA long-axis dimension and area were measured using standard 2- and 4-chamber views, and the volume was calculated using the area-length method for both atria. The echocardiographic and CMR values were compared using the Bland-Altman method. A total of 85 patients and 18 controls were included in the present study. The atrial volumes estimated using the area-length method were significantly smaller when measured using echocardiography than when measured using CMR imaging (LA volume 35 ± 20 vs 49 ± 30 ml/m 2, p 2, p = 0.012). The mean difference (CMR imaging minus echocardiography) was 14 ± 14 ml/m 2 for the LA and 10 ± 16 ml/m 2 for the RA volume. Similar results were found in the healthy controls. No significant intra- or interobserver variability was found within each modality. In conclusion, echocardiography consistently underestimated the atrial volumes compared to CMR imaging using the area-length method.

    AB - Increased atrial volumes predict adverse cardiovascular events. Accordingly, accurate measurement of atrial size has become increasingly important in clinical practice. The area-length method is commonly used to estimate the volume. Disagreements between atrial volumes using echocardiography and other imaging modalities have been found. It is unclear whether this has resulted from differences in the measurement method or discrepancies among imaging modalities. We compared the right atrial (RA) and left atrial (LA) volume estimates using the area-length method for transthoracic echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. Patients undergoing echocardiography and CMR imaging within 1 month were identified retrospectively. For both modalities, the RA and LA long-axis dimension and area were measured using standard 2- and 4-chamber views, and the volume was calculated using the area-length method for both atria. The echocardiographic and CMR values were compared using the Bland-Altman method. A total of 85 patients and 18 controls were included in the present study. The atrial volumes estimated using the area-length method were significantly smaller when measured using echocardiography than when measured using CMR imaging (LA volume 35 ± 20 vs 49 ± 30 ml/m 2, p 2, p = 0.012). The mean difference (CMR imaging minus echocardiography) was 14 ± 14 ml/m 2 for the LA and 10 ± 16 ml/m 2 for the RA volume. Similar results were found in the healthy controls. No significant intra- or interobserver variability was found within each modality. In conclusion, echocardiography consistently underestimated the atrial volumes compared to CMR imaging using the area-length method.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77958571460&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77958571460&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.06.065

    DO - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.06.065

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 21029836

    AN - SCOPUS:77958571460

    VL - 106

    SP - 1345

    EP - 1350

    JO - American Journal of Cardiology

    JF - American Journal of Cardiology

    SN - 0002-9149

    IS - 9

    ER -