Comparison of laparoscopic inversion esophagectomy and open transhiatal esophagectomy for high-grade dysplasia and stage I esophageal adenocarcinoma

Kyle A. Perry, Charles Enestvedt, Thai Pham, Melissa Welker, Blair A. Jobe, John Hunter, Brett Sheppard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hypothesis: The perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic inversion esophagectomy (LIE) are comparable to those of open transhiatal esophagectomy (THE), with potential benefits related to the use of minimally invasive techniques. Design: Case-control study. Setting: Tertiary care university hospital. Patients and Interventions: From July 1, 2003, through March 31, 2008, 21 consecutive patients underwent LIE for high-grade dysplasia or clinical stage I esophageal cancer. We compared these patients with 21 stage-matched control patients treated with THE from August 1, 1995, through August 31, 2003. Main Outcome Measures: Operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, perioperative complications, and disease-free survival. Results: Mean (SD) operative times for LIE (399 [86] minutes) and THE (407 [127] minutes) were not significantly different (P=.80). Patients undergoing LIE had significantly lower intraoperative blood loss (168 mL; P

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)679-683
Number of pages5
JournalArchives of Surgery
Volume144
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2009

Fingerprint

Esophagectomy
Adenocarcinoma
Operative Time
Length of Stay
Tertiary Healthcare
Esophageal Neoplasms
Disease-Free Survival
Case-Control Studies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Comparison of laparoscopic inversion esophagectomy and open transhiatal esophagectomy for high-grade dysplasia and stage I esophageal adenocarcinoma. / Perry, Kyle A.; Enestvedt, Charles; Pham, Thai; Welker, Melissa; Jobe, Blair A.; Hunter, John; Sheppard, Brett.

In: Archives of Surgery, Vol. 144, No. 7, 07.2009, p. 679-683.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f8720e6448f34809a9079de1aa2bd59a,
title = "Comparison of laparoscopic inversion esophagectomy and open transhiatal esophagectomy for high-grade dysplasia and stage I esophageal adenocarcinoma",
abstract = "Hypothesis: The perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic inversion esophagectomy (LIE) are comparable to those of open transhiatal esophagectomy (THE), with potential benefits related to the use of minimally invasive techniques. Design: Case-control study. Setting: Tertiary care university hospital. Patients and Interventions: From July 1, 2003, through March 31, 2008, 21 consecutive patients underwent LIE for high-grade dysplasia or clinical stage I esophageal cancer. We compared these patients with 21 stage-matched control patients treated with THE from August 1, 1995, through August 31, 2003. Main Outcome Measures: Operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, perioperative complications, and disease-free survival. Results: Mean (SD) operative times for LIE (399 [86] minutes) and THE (407 [127] minutes) were not significantly different (P=.80). Patients undergoing LIE had significantly lower intraoperative blood loss (168 mL; P",
author = "Perry, {Kyle A.} and Charles Enestvedt and Thai Pham and Melissa Welker and Jobe, {Blair A.} and John Hunter and Brett Sheppard",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1001/archsurg.2009.113",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "144",
pages = "679--683",
journal = "JAMA Surgery",
issn = "2168-6254",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of laparoscopic inversion esophagectomy and open transhiatal esophagectomy for high-grade dysplasia and stage I esophageal adenocarcinoma

AU - Perry, Kyle A.

AU - Enestvedt, Charles

AU - Pham, Thai

AU - Welker, Melissa

AU - Jobe, Blair A.

AU - Hunter, John

AU - Sheppard, Brett

PY - 2009/7

Y1 - 2009/7

N2 - Hypothesis: The perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic inversion esophagectomy (LIE) are comparable to those of open transhiatal esophagectomy (THE), with potential benefits related to the use of minimally invasive techniques. Design: Case-control study. Setting: Tertiary care university hospital. Patients and Interventions: From July 1, 2003, through March 31, 2008, 21 consecutive patients underwent LIE for high-grade dysplasia or clinical stage I esophageal cancer. We compared these patients with 21 stage-matched control patients treated with THE from August 1, 1995, through August 31, 2003. Main Outcome Measures: Operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, perioperative complications, and disease-free survival. Results: Mean (SD) operative times for LIE (399 [86] minutes) and THE (407 [127] minutes) were not significantly different (P=.80). Patients undergoing LIE had significantly lower intraoperative blood loss (168 mL; P

AB - Hypothesis: The perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic inversion esophagectomy (LIE) are comparable to those of open transhiatal esophagectomy (THE), with potential benefits related to the use of minimally invasive techniques. Design: Case-control study. Setting: Tertiary care university hospital. Patients and Interventions: From July 1, 2003, through March 31, 2008, 21 consecutive patients underwent LIE for high-grade dysplasia or clinical stage I esophageal cancer. We compared these patients with 21 stage-matched control patients treated with THE from August 1, 1995, through August 31, 2003. Main Outcome Measures: Operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, perioperative complications, and disease-free survival. Results: Mean (SD) operative times for LIE (399 [86] minutes) and THE (407 [127] minutes) were not significantly different (P=.80). Patients undergoing LIE had significantly lower intraoperative blood loss (168 mL; P

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67650837934&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67650837934&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archsurg.2009.113

DO - 10.1001/archsurg.2009.113

M3 - Article

C2 - 19620549

AN - SCOPUS:67650837934

VL - 144

SP - 679

EP - 683

JO - JAMA Surgery

JF - JAMA Surgery

SN - 2168-6254

IS - 7

ER -