Comparison of frameless stereotactic systems: Accuracy, precision, and applications

Ethan A. Benardete, Michael A. Leonard, Howard L. Weiner, Kim Burchiel, Nathan R. Selder, Philip L. Gildenberg, Andres M. Lozano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Frameless stereotactic systems have become an integral part of neurosurgical practice. At our center, we recently introduced for clinical use a small, portable, frameless stereotactic system, namely the Cygnus PFS system (Compass International, Rochester, MN). The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of the Cygnus PFS system with that of two larger systems that are also currently in use at our institution, i.e., the SMN system (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and the ISG viewing wand (ISG Technologies, Toronto, Canada). These systems represent three kinds of frameless stereotactic technologies that are commercially available. Each system uses a different method of spatial localization, i.e., mechanical linkage (ISG system), magnetic field digitization (Cygnus system), or optical technology (SMN system). METHODS: Using a stereotactic "phantom," we measured the accuracies of all three systems with identical data sets. The errors in localization in three-dimensional space for nine targets were calculated by using 10 magnetic resonance imaging data sets. The precision of each system was also calculated. RESULTS: With this experimental protocol, the Cygnus system attained a mean accuracy of 1.90 ± 0.7 mm, the ISG viewing wand system a mean accuracy of 1.67 ± 0.43 mm, and the SMN microscope a mean accuracy of 2.61 ± 0.99 mm. The precision values were not significantly different among the systems. CONCLUSION: We observed only small differences in accuracy and precision among these three systems. We briefly review the advantages and disadvantages of each system and note that other factors, such as portability, ease of use, and microscope integration, should influence the selection of a frameless stereotactic system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1409-1416
Number of pages8
JournalNeurosurgery
Volume49
Issue number6
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Technology
Optical Devices
Magnetic Fields
Canada
Germany
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Datasets

Keywords

  • Accuracy
  • Precision
  • Stereotactic techniques

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Benardete, E. A., Leonard, M. A., Weiner, H. L., Burchiel, K., Selder, N. R., Gildenberg, P. L., & Lozano, A. M. (2001). Comparison of frameless stereotactic systems: Accuracy, precision, and applications. Neurosurgery, 49(6), 1409-1416.

Comparison of frameless stereotactic systems : Accuracy, precision, and applications. / Benardete, Ethan A.; Leonard, Michael A.; Weiner, Howard L.; Burchiel, Kim; Selder, Nathan R.; Gildenberg, Philip L.; Lozano, Andres M.

In: Neurosurgery, Vol. 49, No. 6, 2001, p. 1409-1416.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Benardete, EA, Leonard, MA, Weiner, HL, Burchiel, K, Selder, NR, Gildenberg, PL & Lozano, AM 2001, 'Comparison of frameless stereotactic systems: Accuracy, precision, and applications', Neurosurgery, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 1409-1416.
Benardete EA, Leonard MA, Weiner HL, Burchiel K, Selder NR, Gildenberg PL et al. Comparison of frameless stereotactic systems: Accuracy, precision, and applications. Neurosurgery. 2001;49(6):1409-1416.
Benardete, Ethan A. ; Leonard, Michael A. ; Weiner, Howard L. ; Burchiel, Kim ; Selder, Nathan R. ; Gildenberg, Philip L. ; Lozano, Andres M. / Comparison of frameless stereotactic systems : Accuracy, precision, and applications. In: Neurosurgery. 2001 ; Vol. 49, No. 6. pp. 1409-1416.
@article{4410682de96047f6a948a31de0820228,
title = "Comparison of frameless stereotactic systems: Accuracy, precision, and applications",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Frameless stereotactic systems have become an integral part of neurosurgical practice. At our center, we recently introduced for clinical use a small, portable, frameless stereotactic system, namely the Cygnus PFS system (Compass International, Rochester, MN). The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of the Cygnus PFS system with that of two larger systems that are also currently in use at our institution, i.e., the SMN system (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and the ISG viewing wand (ISG Technologies, Toronto, Canada). These systems represent three kinds of frameless stereotactic technologies that are commercially available. Each system uses a different method of spatial localization, i.e., mechanical linkage (ISG system), magnetic field digitization (Cygnus system), or optical technology (SMN system). METHODS: Using a stereotactic {"}phantom,{"} we measured the accuracies of all three systems with identical data sets. The errors in localization in three-dimensional space for nine targets were calculated by using 10 magnetic resonance imaging data sets. The precision of each system was also calculated. RESULTS: With this experimental protocol, the Cygnus system attained a mean accuracy of 1.90 ± 0.7 mm, the ISG viewing wand system a mean accuracy of 1.67 ± 0.43 mm, and the SMN microscope a mean accuracy of 2.61 ± 0.99 mm. The precision values were not significantly different among the systems. CONCLUSION: We observed only small differences in accuracy and precision among these three systems. We briefly review the advantages and disadvantages of each system and note that other factors, such as portability, ease of use, and microscope integration, should influence the selection of a frameless stereotactic system.",
keywords = "Accuracy, Precision, Stereotactic techniques",
author = "Benardete, {Ethan A.} and Leonard, {Michael A.} and Weiner, {Howard L.} and Kim Burchiel and Selder, {Nathan R.} and Gildenberg, {Philip L.} and Lozano, {Andres M.}",
year = "2001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "1409--1416",
journal = "Neurosurgery",
issn = "0148-396X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of frameless stereotactic systems

T2 - Accuracy, precision, and applications

AU - Benardete, Ethan A.

AU - Leonard, Michael A.

AU - Weiner, Howard L.

AU - Burchiel, Kim

AU - Selder, Nathan R.

AU - Gildenberg, Philip L.

AU - Lozano, Andres M.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Frameless stereotactic systems have become an integral part of neurosurgical practice. At our center, we recently introduced for clinical use a small, portable, frameless stereotactic system, namely the Cygnus PFS system (Compass International, Rochester, MN). The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of the Cygnus PFS system with that of two larger systems that are also currently in use at our institution, i.e., the SMN system (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and the ISG viewing wand (ISG Technologies, Toronto, Canada). These systems represent three kinds of frameless stereotactic technologies that are commercially available. Each system uses a different method of spatial localization, i.e., mechanical linkage (ISG system), magnetic field digitization (Cygnus system), or optical technology (SMN system). METHODS: Using a stereotactic "phantom," we measured the accuracies of all three systems with identical data sets. The errors in localization in three-dimensional space for nine targets were calculated by using 10 magnetic resonance imaging data sets. The precision of each system was also calculated. RESULTS: With this experimental protocol, the Cygnus system attained a mean accuracy of 1.90 ± 0.7 mm, the ISG viewing wand system a mean accuracy of 1.67 ± 0.43 mm, and the SMN microscope a mean accuracy of 2.61 ± 0.99 mm. The precision values were not significantly different among the systems. CONCLUSION: We observed only small differences in accuracy and precision among these three systems. We briefly review the advantages and disadvantages of each system and note that other factors, such as portability, ease of use, and microscope integration, should influence the selection of a frameless stereotactic system.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Frameless stereotactic systems have become an integral part of neurosurgical practice. At our center, we recently introduced for clinical use a small, portable, frameless stereotactic system, namely the Cygnus PFS system (Compass International, Rochester, MN). The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of the Cygnus PFS system with that of two larger systems that are also currently in use at our institution, i.e., the SMN system (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and the ISG viewing wand (ISG Technologies, Toronto, Canada). These systems represent three kinds of frameless stereotactic technologies that are commercially available. Each system uses a different method of spatial localization, i.e., mechanical linkage (ISG system), magnetic field digitization (Cygnus system), or optical technology (SMN system). METHODS: Using a stereotactic "phantom," we measured the accuracies of all three systems with identical data sets. The errors in localization in three-dimensional space for nine targets were calculated by using 10 magnetic resonance imaging data sets. The precision of each system was also calculated. RESULTS: With this experimental protocol, the Cygnus system attained a mean accuracy of 1.90 ± 0.7 mm, the ISG viewing wand system a mean accuracy of 1.67 ± 0.43 mm, and the SMN microscope a mean accuracy of 2.61 ± 0.99 mm. The precision values were not significantly different among the systems. CONCLUSION: We observed only small differences in accuracy and precision among these three systems. We briefly review the advantages and disadvantages of each system and note that other factors, such as portability, ease of use, and microscope integration, should influence the selection of a frameless stereotactic system.

KW - Accuracy

KW - Precision

KW - Stereotactic techniques

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035722283&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035722283&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11846941

AN - SCOPUS:0035722283

VL - 49

SP - 1409

EP - 1416

JO - Neurosurgery

JF - Neurosurgery

SN - 0148-396X

IS - 6

ER -