Comparison of complementary and alternative medicine with conventional mind-body therapies for chronic back pain: Protocol for the Mind-body Approaches to Pain (MAP) randomized controlled trial

Daniel C. Cherkin, Karen J. Sherman, Benjamin H. Balderson, Judith A. Turner, Andrea J. Cook, Brenda Stoelb, Patricia M. Herman, Richard (Rick) Deyo, Rene J. Hawkes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The self-reported health and functional status of persons with back pain in the United States have declined in recent years, despite greatly increased medical expenditures due to this problem. Although patient psychosocial factors such as pain-related beliefs, thoughts and coping behaviors have been demonstrated to affect how well patients respond to treatments for back pain, few patients receive treatments that address these factors. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), which addresses psychosocial factors, has been found to be effective for back pain, but access to qualified therapists is limited. Another treatment option with potential for addressing psychosocial issues, mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), is increasingly available. MBSR has been found to be helpful for various mental and physical conditions, but it has not been well-studied for application with chronic back pain patients. In this trial, we will seek to determine whether MBSR is an effective and cost-effective treatment option for persons with chronic back pain, compare its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness compared with CBT and explore the psychosocial variables that may mediate the effects of MBSR and CBT on patient outcomes. Methods/Design: In this trial, we will randomize 397 adults with nonspecific chronic back pain to CBT, MBSR or usual care arms (99 per group). Both interventions will consist of eight weekly 2-hour group sessions supplemented by home practice. The MBSR protocol also includes an optional 6-hour retreat. Interviewers masked to treatment assignments will assess outcomes 5, 10, 26 and 52 weeks postrandomization. The primary outcomes will be pain-related functional limitations (based on the Roland Disability Questionnaire) and symptom bothersomeness (rated on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale) at 26 weeks. Discussion: If MBSR is found to be an effective and cost-effective treatment option for patients with chronic back pain, it will become a valuable addition to the limited treatment options available to patients with significant psychosocial contributors to their pain. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01467843.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number211
JournalTrials
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 7 2014

Fingerprint

Mind-Body Therapies
Mindfulness
Back Pain
Complementary Therapies
Chronic Pain
Randomized Controlled Trials
Pain
Cognitive Therapy
Health Care Costs
Psychology
Therapeutics
Psychological Adaptation
Health Expenditures
Health Status
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Interviews

Keywords

  • Back pain
  • Cognitive-behavioral therapy
  • Mindfulness meditation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

Comparison of complementary and alternative medicine with conventional mind-body therapies for chronic back pain : Protocol for the Mind-body Approaches to Pain (MAP) randomized controlled trial. / Cherkin, Daniel C.; Sherman, Karen J.; Balderson, Benjamin H.; Turner, Judith A.; Cook, Andrea J.; Stoelb, Brenda; Herman, Patricia M.; Deyo, Richard (Rick); Hawkes, Rene J.

In: Trials, Vol. 15, No. 1, 211, 07.06.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cherkin, Daniel C. ; Sherman, Karen J. ; Balderson, Benjamin H. ; Turner, Judith A. ; Cook, Andrea J. ; Stoelb, Brenda ; Herman, Patricia M. ; Deyo, Richard (Rick) ; Hawkes, Rene J. / Comparison of complementary and alternative medicine with conventional mind-body therapies for chronic back pain : Protocol for the Mind-body Approaches to Pain (MAP) randomized controlled trial. In: Trials. 2014 ; Vol. 15, No. 1.
@article{069875a2af6a4d068a72a8292150f1f5,
title = "Comparison of complementary and alternative medicine with conventional mind-body therapies for chronic back pain: Protocol for the Mind-body Approaches to Pain (MAP) randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "Background: The self-reported health and functional status of persons with back pain in the United States have declined in recent years, despite greatly increased medical expenditures due to this problem. Although patient psychosocial factors such as pain-related beliefs, thoughts and coping behaviors have been demonstrated to affect how well patients respond to treatments for back pain, few patients receive treatments that address these factors. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), which addresses psychosocial factors, has been found to be effective for back pain, but access to qualified therapists is limited. Another treatment option with potential for addressing psychosocial issues, mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), is increasingly available. MBSR has been found to be helpful for various mental and physical conditions, but it has not been well-studied for application with chronic back pain patients. In this trial, we will seek to determine whether MBSR is an effective and cost-effective treatment option for persons with chronic back pain, compare its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness compared with CBT and explore the psychosocial variables that may mediate the effects of MBSR and CBT on patient outcomes. Methods/Design: In this trial, we will randomize 397 adults with nonspecific chronic back pain to CBT, MBSR or usual care arms (99 per group). Both interventions will consist of eight weekly 2-hour group sessions supplemented by home practice. The MBSR protocol also includes an optional 6-hour retreat. Interviewers masked to treatment assignments will assess outcomes 5, 10, 26 and 52 weeks postrandomization. The primary outcomes will be pain-related functional limitations (based on the Roland Disability Questionnaire) and symptom bothersomeness (rated on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale) at 26 weeks. Discussion: If MBSR is found to be an effective and cost-effective treatment option for patients with chronic back pain, it will become a valuable addition to the limited treatment options available to patients with significant psychosocial contributors to their pain. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01467843.",
keywords = "Back pain, Cognitive-behavioral therapy, Mindfulness meditation",
author = "Cherkin, {Daniel C.} and Sherman, {Karen J.} and Balderson, {Benjamin H.} and Turner, {Judith A.} and Cook, {Andrea J.} and Brenda Stoelb and Herman, {Patricia M.} and Deyo, {Richard (Rick)} and Hawkes, {Rene J.}",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1186/1745-6215-15-211",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
journal = "Trials",
issn = "1745-6215",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of complementary and alternative medicine with conventional mind-body therapies for chronic back pain

T2 - Protocol for the Mind-body Approaches to Pain (MAP) randomized controlled trial

AU - Cherkin, Daniel C.

AU - Sherman, Karen J.

AU - Balderson, Benjamin H.

AU - Turner, Judith A.

AU - Cook, Andrea J.

AU - Stoelb, Brenda

AU - Herman, Patricia M.

AU - Deyo, Richard (Rick)

AU - Hawkes, Rene J.

PY - 2014/6/7

Y1 - 2014/6/7

N2 - Background: The self-reported health and functional status of persons with back pain in the United States have declined in recent years, despite greatly increased medical expenditures due to this problem. Although patient psychosocial factors such as pain-related beliefs, thoughts and coping behaviors have been demonstrated to affect how well patients respond to treatments for back pain, few patients receive treatments that address these factors. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), which addresses psychosocial factors, has been found to be effective for back pain, but access to qualified therapists is limited. Another treatment option with potential for addressing psychosocial issues, mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), is increasingly available. MBSR has been found to be helpful for various mental and physical conditions, but it has not been well-studied for application with chronic back pain patients. In this trial, we will seek to determine whether MBSR is an effective and cost-effective treatment option for persons with chronic back pain, compare its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness compared with CBT and explore the psychosocial variables that may mediate the effects of MBSR and CBT on patient outcomes. Methods/Design: In this trial, we will randomize 397 adults with nonspecific chronic back pain to CBT, MBSR or usual care arms (99 per group). Both interventions will consist of eight weekly 2-hour group sessions supplemented by home practice. The MBSR protocol also includes an optional 6-hour retreat. Interviewers masked to treatment assignments will assess outcomes 5, 10, 26 and 52 weeks postrandomization. The primary outcomes will be pain-related functional limitations (based on the Roland Disability Questionnaire) and symptom bothersomeness (rated on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale) at 26 weeks. Discussion: If MBSR is found to be an effective and cost-effective treatment option for patients with chronic back pain, it will become a valuable addition to the limited treatment options available to patients with significant psychosocial contributors to their pain. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01467843.

AB - Background: The self-reported health and functional status of persons with back pain in the United States have declined in recent years, despite greatly increased medical expenditures due to this problem. Although patient psychosocial factors such as pain-related beliefs, thoughts and coping behaviors have been demonstrated to affect how well patients respond to treatments for back pain, few patients receive treatments that address these factors. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), which addresses psychosocial factors, has been found to be effective for back pain, but access to qualified therapists is limited. Another treatment option with potential for addressing psychosocial issues, mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), is increasingly available. MBSR has been found to be helpful for various mental and physical conditions, but it has not been well-studied for application with chronic back pain patients. In this trial, we will seek to determine whether MBSR is an effective and cost-effective treatment option for persons with chronic back pain, compare its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness compared with CBT and explore the psychosocial variables that may mediate the effects of MBSR and CBT on patient outcomes. Methods/Design: In this trial, we will randomize 397 adults with nonspecific chronic back pain to CBT, MBSR or usual care arms (99 per group). Both interventions will consist of eight weekly 2-hour group sessions supplemented by home practice. The MBSR protocol also includes an optional 6-hour retreat. Interviewers masked to treatment assignments will assess outcomes 5, 10, 26 and 52 weeks postrandomization. The primary outcomes will be pain-related functional limitations (based on the Roland Disability Questionnaire) and symptom bothersomeness (rated on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale) at 26 weeks. Discussion: If MBSR is found to be an effective and cost-effective treatment option for patients with chronic back pain, it will become a valuable addition to the limited treatment options available to patients with significant psychosocial contributors to their pain. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01467843.

KW - Back pain

KW - Cognitive-behavioral therapy

KW - Mindfulness meditation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902252540&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84902252540&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1745-6215-15-211

DO - 10.1186/1745-6215-15-211

M3 - Article

C2 - 24906419

AN - SCOPUS:84902252540

VL - 15

JO - Trials

JF - Trials

SN - 1745-6215

IS - 1

M1 - 211

ER -